Precious Metals Recovery LLC RCRA Permit Application Dry Hills ...
Precious Metals Recovery LLC RCRA Permit Application Dry Hills ... Precious Metals Recovery LLC RCRA Permit Application Dry Hills ...
The principal treatment activity at the proposed TSF is the processing of mercury-bearing materials for the recovery of elemental mercury. Recovered elemental mercury will be either transferred for sale or to a National Repository for long-term storage and management. Elemental mercury will also be accepted for interim storage at the proposed TSF pending the availability of a National Repository. Wastes Generated On-Site Elemental mercury will be reclaimed from accepted wastes as a result of successful treatment. Treatment residues resulting from the processes will include, but not be limited to, spent activated carbon from carbon filters, sludge, residues, and hygiene dust collector dust. Small amounts of waste will be generated as a result of the proposed TSF’s operations. Housekeeping waste will be comprised of wipes, rags, towels, paper goods, booties, gloves, disposable coveralls, disposable sampling devices, etc. These housekeeping materials may contain mercury or other chemicals used in the processes. Continuous ambient air monitoring devices and discrete sampling instruments will also generate spent sample cartridges or other small amounts of waste. The activities necessary to characterize and validate that received materials are within acceptable limits will generate some mercury-containing waste materials (gloves, respirator cartridges, sampling devices, wipes, paper towels, discarded sample containers, etc.). The fingerprinting analyses conducted on-site will generate another lab waste stream. The hygiene air ventilation system will generate spent carbon filters that may contain mercury. No vehicle maintenance or fueling will occur at the proposed TSF. 3 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION - 40 CFR 264.13(b) A hazardous waste determination will be made for all waste streams generated, stored, or treated at the proposed TSF. The test methods to measure the parameters discussed throughout this document are identified in Table 1. Whenever possible, the proposed TSF will use established methods from Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846), US EPA, 1986 and its updates. If a method has not been established by the EPA, an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) method will be used. When a contracted laboratory performs analyses using a method found in SW-846, and the method is one that is certifiable by the State of Nevada, the laboratory performing the analyses shall be certified for that method. Waste Analysis Plan App 2A-Page 2 JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. March 2013
Table 1: Analytical Methods for the Proposed TSF Waste Streams PARAMETER METHOD NUMBER Arsenic (ICP) 6010A Ash D482-87 Barium (ICP) 6010A Cadmium (ICP) 6010A Chromium (ICP) 6010A Lead (ICP) 6010A Mercury Cold Vapor (AA) 7470A, 7471A Paint Filter 9095 pH Electrometric 9040B pH Paper 9041A pH Waste 9045C Physical Description D4979-89 Selenium (ICP) 6010A Silver (ICP) 6010A Specific Gravity D1429-86-MOD TCLP 1311 Zinc (ICP) 6010A Profile Process for Waste Generated Off-site Before the proposed TSF can approve a waste stream for storage or treatment, a completed Waste Profile Sheet must be provided by the waste generator. When the profile information is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed to assess the acceptability of the waste stream for management at the proposed TSF. This profile review and approval occurs prior to notifying the waste generator that the waste stream is acceptable for management at the proposed TSF. The Waste Profile Sheet contains information about the waste generator, physical and chemical characteristics of the waste, the process that generated the waste, applicable waste codes, applicable DOT shipping name, and the waste generator certification that the information provided is accurate. The waste generator must also certify that the waste is Waste Analysis Plan App 2A-Page 3 JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. March 2013
- Page 245 and 246: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 247 and 248: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 249 and 250: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ NOTE: 1
- Page 251 and 252: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 253 and 254: B A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H3409
- Page 255 and 256: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 257 and 258: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 259 and 260: APPENDIX 1-C Process Flow Diagrams
- Page 261 and 262: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ 1 2 3 4
- Page 263 and 264: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 265 and 266: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 267 and 268: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 269 and 270: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 271 and 272: A B C D E F $$W ATERMARKD$$ H340940
- Page 273 and 274: H - 340940 Precious Metals Recovery
- Page 275 and 276: H - 340940 Precious Metals Recovery
- Page 277 and 278: H - 340940 Precious Metals Recovery
- Page 279 and 280: H - 340940 Precious Metals Recovery
- Page 281 and 282: H - 340940 Precious Metals Recovery
- Page 283 and 284: APPENDIX 1-D Floor and Wall Sealant
- Page 285 and 286: C8 x 11.5 EPOXY COATING ON 2" THICK
- Page 287 and 288: 8" THICK INSULATED PRECAST CONCRETE
- Page 289 and 290: C8 x 11.5 EPOXY COATING ON 2" THICK
- Page 291 and 292: 2. PRODUCTS 2.1 Stonclad GS Stoncla
- Page 293 and 294: APPENDIX 2-A Waste Analysis Plan
- Page 295: WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN 1 PURPOSE AND S
- Page 299 and 300: All wastes received will have been
- Page 301 and 302: Waste will not be accepted until th
- Page 303 and 304: Table 3: Waste Sampling Matrix Type
- Page 305 and 306: 9 LDR TREATMENT STANDARDS Waste Des
- Page 307 and 308: Drummed consolidation waste will be
- Page 309 and 310: eevaluated whenever the process tha
- Page 311 and 312: ATTACHMENT 2-A-1 Profile Instructio
- Page 313 and 314: PMR LLC 460 W. 50 North Suite 500 S
- Page 315 and 316: • Is the waste pyrophoric? a See
- Page 317 and 318: EPA's Chemical Compatibility Chart
- Page 319 and 320: 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION METHOD 90
- Page 321 and 322: 7.2.3 Adjust the electrodes in the
- Page 323 and 324: METHOD 9045D SOIL AND WASTE pH 9045
- Page 325 and 326: NOTE: Combination electrodes incorp
- Page 327 and 328: 10.0 REFERENCES 1. National Bureau
- Page 329 and 330: 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION METHOD 13
- Page 331 and 332: 4.2.2 Bottle Extraction Vessel. Whe
- Page 333 and 334: 4.10 Watchglass, appropriate diamet
- Page 335 and 336: 7.0 PROCEDURE 7.1 Preliminary Evalu
- Page 337 and 338: determine whether the solid materia
- Page 339 and 340: solids content of the waste sample
- Page 341 and 342: material into an extractor bottle.
- Page 343 and 344: sample from which no additional liq
- Page 345 and 346: slowly out of the ZHE device into a
The principal treatment activity at the proposed TSF is the processing of mercury-bearing<br />
materials for the recovery of elemental mercury. Recovered elemental mercury will be either<br />
transferred for sale or to a National Repository for long-term storage and management.<br />
Elemental mercury will also be accepted for interim storage at the proposed TSF pending the<br />
availability of a National Repository.<br />
Wastes Generated On-Site<br />
Elemental mercury will be reclaimed from accepted wastes as a result of successful treatment.<br />
Treatment residues resulting from the processes will include, but not be limited to, spent<br />
activated carbon from carbon filters, sludge, residues, and hygiene dust collector dust.<br />
Small amounts of waste will be generated as a result of the proposed TSF’s operations.<br />
Housekeeping waste will be comprised of wipes, rags, towels, paper goods, booties, gloves,<br />
disposable coveralls, disposable sampling devices, etc. These housekeeping materials may<br />
contain mercury or other chemicals used in the processes. Continuous ambient air monitoring<br />
devices and discrete sampling instruments will also generate spent sample cartridges or other<br />
small amounts of waste.<br />
The activities necessary to characterize and validate that received materials are within acceptable<br />
limits will generate some mercury-containing waste materials (gloves, respirator cartridges,<br />
sampling devices, wipes, paper towels, discarded sample containers, etc.). The fingerprinting<br />
analyses conducted on-site will generate another lab waste stream.<br />
The hygiene air ventilation system will generate spent carbon filters that may contain mercury.<br />
No vehicle maintenance or fueling will occur at the proposed TSF.<br />
3 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION - 40 CFR 264.13(b)<br />
A hazardous waste determination will be made for all waste streams generated, stored, or treated<br />
at the proposed TSF. The test methods to measure the parameters discussed throughout this<br />
document are identified in Table 1. Whenever possible, the proposed TSF will use<br />
established methods from Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical<br />
Methods (SW-846), US EPA, 1986 and its updates. If a method has not been established by<br />
the EPA, an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) method will be used.<br />
When a contracted laboratory performs analyses using a method found in SW-846, and the<br />
method is one that is certifiable by the State of Nevada, the laboratory performing the<br />
analyses shall be certified for that method.<br />
Waste Analysis Plan App 2A-Page 2<br />
JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. March 2013