Precious Metals Recovery LLC RCRA Permit Application Dry Hills ...
Precious Metals Recovery LLC RCRA Permit Application Dry Hills ... Precious Metals Recovery LLC RCRA Permit Application Dry Hills ...
22.7 Description of Drainage in Storage Areas – 40 CFR 270.15 & 264.175 See Drainage Arrangement H340940-0000-50-015-0008 in Appendix 1-A for details on drainage in storage areas. 22.8 Management of Accumulated Liquids – 40 CFR 270.15 & 264.175 22.8.1 Identification Inspections of the storage area will be conducted to identify the presence of liquids in the secondary containment in accordance with the Inspection Plan (see Appendix 4-A). 22.8.2 Collection and Removal – 40 CFR 270.15(a)(5) & 264.175(b)(5) In the unlikely event liquid hazardous waste inadvertently escapes its primary container, it will be collected in the curbed drainage and sump network (see Appendix 1-A). A typical sump design is presented in Appendix 1-A. A portable sump pump may then be used to remove standing liquid from the sump, and appropriate spill response measures can be taken. Depending on the type of liquid (i.e., calomel or elemental mercury), it may be added to the Decomposition Tank, retorted, or placed in a pig. 22.8.3 Analysis Liquids recovered from a collection sump will be presumed as hazardous waste, and will be managed in accordance with the proposed TSF procedures for wastes of that type. Wastes sent off-site for treatment and/or disposal will be characterized. 22.9 Management of Run-on – 40 CFR 270.15(a)(4) & 264.175(b)(4) The storage areas will be enclosed within the proposed TSF Building. The building roof and walls are designed to prevent precipitation run-on to the storage area. 22.10 Storage without Free Liquids – 40 CFR 264.175(c) 22.10.1 Spent Activated Carbon Storage Area Spent activated carbon will be stored in a shared area with calomel. A description of the area and the management practices is presented in Section 22.4. Secondary containment is included in the shared storage area, although not required for the spent activated carbon itself. 22.10.2 Demonstrate No Free Liquids – 40 CFR 270(15)(b)(1) & 264.175(c), & 264.314 Spent activated carbon is not expected to contain free liquids. Annually, the spent activated carbon will be tested for liquids using the Paint Filter Test (SW846 Method 9095B). The processes used by the waste generators that produce spent activated carbon, as well as the processes that will produce spent activated carbon at the proposed TSF, are expected to operate within known variations. Management practices will be implemented to allow advanced notice of changes to these processes. In the event a significant change occurs, a full characterization PMR RCRA Permit Application, Dry Hills Facility Page 112 JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. | HATCH March 2013
will be done on the new waste stream. In the absence of significant change, an annual characterization of the spent activated carbon waste stream is expected to be sufficient. 22.11 Special Requirements for Ignitable, Incompatible, or Reactive Wastes – 40 CFR 270.15, 261.23, 264.176, & 264.177 22.11.1 Ignitable or Reactive Wastes – 40 CFR 261.21 & 261.23 No ignitable or reactive wastes will be accepted at the proposed TSF. No special accommodations have been incorporated into the proposed TSF design to allow acceptance of ignitable or reactive wastes. Explosives will not be accepted at the proposed TSF. Use of water throughout the proposed TSF will be minimized. The proposed TSF will not be connected to a municipal water treatment plant, and therefore, minimizes the introduction of water. Water will be transported to and from the proposed TSF. It will be a priority of the process design and operation to limit water usage. 22.11.2 Incompatible Wastes – 40 CFR 264.17(b), 264.177, & 270.15(b) The mercury and mercury-bearing materials that will be accepted by the proposed TSF are not incompatible wastes. Incoming Materials Waste generators (who send mercury and mercury-bearing materials to the proposed TSF) will be responsible for placing waste streams in appropriate containers. The proposed TSF will inspect and receive these wastes as described in Section 1.2.1. No material that is incompatible with the primary materials to be processed at the proposed TSF will be accepted. Wastes Generated at the Proposed TSF Similar wastes generated at the proposed TSF may be placed in the same container, provided that the container itself is not made from an incompatible material; incompatible wastes will not be mixed or placed in the same container. The compatibility chart (see Appendix 2-B) will be used to determine compatibility. The WAP (Appendix 2-A) presents the procedure for cleaning and reusing containers at the proposed TSF. 22.12 Air Emission Standards – 40 CFR 270.15(e), 264.179, & 264.1086 Independent of this application, the proposed TSF will pursue the applicable air permits through NDEP, Bureau of Air Quality. The proposed TSF will comply with the air emission standards established in the issued air permit. Additionally, the proposed TSF will conform to the air emission standards of Subpart CC of 40 CFR Part 264, as applicable. PMR RCRA Permit Application, Dry Hills Facility Page 113 JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. | HATCH March 2013
- Page 113 and 114: ii. The sampling person removes a s
- Page 115 and 116: 2.9 Screening for Ignitable, Reacti
- Page 117 and 118: 3.0 SECURITY PLAN - 40 CFR 270.14(b
- Page 119 and 120: 4.0 INSPECTION PLAN - 40 CFR 270.14
- Page 121 and 122: TSF, associated hazards, places whe
- Page 123 and 124: Outside of working hours, a notific
- Page 125 and 126: Damaged containers will be placed i
- Page 127 and 128: 7.0 PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROCEDURE
- Page 129 and 130: 8.0 PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL IGNITI
- Page 131 and 132: 10.0 TRAFFIC - 40 CFR 270.14(b)(10)
- Page 133 and 134: Delivery frequency of reagents will
- Page 135 and 136: 10.3 Traffic Control Signs Traffic
- Page 137 and 138: 11.4 Surrounding Land Use - 40 CFR
- Page 139 and 140: 12.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING PLAN - 40 C
- Page 141 and 142: that are not land based. Closure of
- Page 143 and 144: 13.4.6 Types of Off-site Waste Mana
- Page 145 and 146: 14.0 CLOSED HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSA
- Page 147 and 148: storage area (e.g., storage racks),
- Page 149 and 150: 16.0 POST-CLOSURE ESTIMATES - 40 CF
- Page 151 and 152: 18.0 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP - 40 CFR 270
- Page 153 and 154: 20.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING - 40 CF
- Page 155 and 156: 22.0 CONTAINERS AND CONTAINMENT - 4
- Page 157 and 158: Figure 22.1-2: Dedicated Transfer C
- Page 159 and 160: Larger sized HDPE drums may be used
- Page 161 and 162: 22.3.2 Labeling Containers - 40 CFR
- Page 163: 22.5 Description of Secondary Conta
- Page 167 and 168: 23.0 TREATMENT AND STORAGE TANKS Me
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 23.0-2: HCl Tank and Locatio
- Page 171 and 172: Tank Dimensions Waste Solution Stor
- Page 173 and 174: decomposed in the Decomposition Tan
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 23.1-3: Waste Solution Stora
- Page 177 and 178: The Water Storage Tank will supply
- Page 179 and 180: Tank Caustic Soda Storage Tank* Hyd
- Page 181 and 182: 23.13 Recordkeeping A recordkeeping
- Page 183 and 184: 25.0 WASTE PILES - 40 CFR 270.18 &
- Page 185 and 186: 27.0 LAND TREATMENT - 40 CFR 270.20
- Page 187 and 188: 29.0 BOILERS/INDUSTRIAL FURNACE - 4
- Page 189 and 190: 30.1.3 Retort Operating Procedures
- Page 191 and 192: of 13.5 feet long by 4.7 feet wide
- Page 193 and 194: 31.0 PROCESS VENTS - 40 CFR 270.24
- Page 195 and 196: 33.0 DRIP PADS - 40 CFR 270.26 & 26
- Page 197 and 198: 35.0 REFERENCES American Society of
- Page 199 and 200: At the PMR Dry Hills Facility Open
will be done on the new waste stream. In the absence of significant change, an annual<br />
characterization of the spent activated carbon waste stream is expected to be sufficient.<br />
22.11 Special Requirements for Ignitable, Incompatible, or Reactive Wastes –<br />
40 CFR 270.15, 261.23, 264.176, & 264.177<br />
22.11.1 Ignitable or Reactive Wastes – 40 CFR 261.21 & 261.23<br />
No ignitable or reactive wastes will be accepted at the proposed TSF. No special<br />
accommodations have been incorporated into the proposed TSF design to allow acceptance of<br />
ignitable or reactive wastes.<br />
Explosives will not be accepted at the proposed TSF. Use of water throughout the proposed TSF<br />
will be minimized. The proposed TSF will not be connected to a municipal water treatment<br />
plant, and therefore, minimizes the introduction of water. Water will be transported to and from<br />
the proposed TSF. It will be a priority of the process design and operation to limit water usage.<br />
22.11.2 Incompatible Wastes – 40 CFR 264.17(b), 264.177, & 270.15(b)<br />
The mercury and mercury-bearing materials that will be accepted by the proposed TSF are not<br />
incompatible wastes.<br />
Incoming Materials<br />
Waste generators (who send mercury and mercury-bearing materials to the proposed TSF) will<br />
be responsible for placing waste streams in appropriate containers. The proposed TSF will<br />
inspect and receive these wastes as described in Section 1.2.1.<br />
No material that is incompatible with the primary materials to be processed at the proposed TSF<br />
will be accepted.<br />
Wastes Generated at the Proposed TSF<br />
Similar wastes generated at the proposed TSF may be placed in the same container, provided that<br />
the container itself is not made from an incompatible material; incompatible wastes will not be<br />
mixed or placed in the same container. The compatibility chart (see Appendix 2-B) will be used<br />
to determine compatibility.<br />
The WAP (Appendix 2-A) presents the procedure for cleaning and reusing containers at the<br />
proposed TSF.<br />
22.12 Air Emission Standards – 40 CFR 270.15(e), 264.179, & 264.1086<br />
Independent of this application, the proposed TSF will pursue the applicable air permits through<br />
NDEP, Bureau of Air Quality. The proposed TSF will comply with the air emission standards<br />
established in the issued air permit. Additionally, the proposed TSF will conform to the air<br />
emission standards of Subpart CC of 40 CFR Part 264, as applicable.<br />
PMR <strong>RCRA</strong> <strong>Permit</strong> <strong>Application</strong>, <strong>Dry</strong> <strong>Hills</strong> Facility Page 113<br />
JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. | HATCH March 2013