Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a printing<br />
company’s flue gases. In another case, relatively large<br />
amounts of glass waste generated by one company<br />
were used in the construction industry. The innovations<br />
led to environmental and economic benefits (Mirata &<br />
Emtairah, 2005).<br />
Both industrial symbiosis projects powerfully illustrate<br />
the importance of the systemic view. Individually,<br />
firms in the projects were unsustainable, but as a<br />
system, they are sustainable. Firms can become part<br />
of sustainable systems without having to become<br />
sustainable independent of those systems 6 , which<br />
raises important questions about whether individual<br />
firms can be sustainable within unsustainable systems;<br />
this question demarcates the frontier of current thinking<br />
and practice.<br />
2. Collaborations become increasingly<br />
interdependent<br />
In Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation, firms redesign<br />
collaborations and engage with more diverse<br />
collaborators and with collaborators who previously<br />
would have been dismissed, including competitors and<br />
lobby groups (Dangelico & Pujari, 2010). Firms on their<br />
own have limited impact on sustainability challenges,<br />
which require systems solutions. There<strong>for</strong>e, the <strong>for</strong>mal<br />
and in<strong>for</strong>mal institutions of society need to come<br />
together, and firms, government, scientific institutes,<br />
NGOs and individuals need to participate in open<br />
experimentation (Loorbach, Van Bakel, Whiteman &<br />
Rotmans, 2010).<br />
6 The authors are grateful to Pam Laughland <strong>for</strong> this observation.<br />
In the base metals industry, radical innovations are<br />
rarely implemented (despite their availability) because<br />
of technologically and socially embedded production<br />
systems — the locked-in effect. A solution could be<br />
to develop and extend inter-firm knowledge networks,<br />
which are useful <strong>for</strong> knowledge cross-fertilization,<br />
especially at the pre-competitive stage. Such networks<br />
should include connections with public R&D facilities,<br />
such as universities and technological institutes (Moors<br />
& Vergragt, 2002).<br />
In the context of Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />
collaborations can be complex. For example, tensions<br />
may emerge with a hostile NGO. Yet, NGOs may view<br />
industry as culpable while working collaboratively<br />
with business on innovative remedial or development<br />
programs, such as in the following example:<br />
In Practice<br />
Greenpeace worked with the German firm<br />
Foron Household Appliances to challenge<br />
established practices and propose an<br />
alternative in the manufacture and use<br />
of harmful chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)<br />
refrigerants. Greenpeace acted as a bridge,<br />
both by establishing links with mavericks,<br />
key market players and lead adopters<br />
and by linking into coalitions of supportive<br />
market players and stakeholders. Adapted<br />
from Staf<strong>for</strong>d and Hartman (2001).<br />
integrating collaborators sets the context <strong>for</strong> new<br />
product development (NPD) (Ornetzeder & Rohracher,<br />
2006).<br />
Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 38