23.07.2013 Views

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a printing<br />

company’s flue gases. In another case, relatively large<br />

amounts of glass waste generated by one company<br />

were used in the construction industry. The innovations<br />

led to environmental and economic benefits (Mirata &<br />

Emtairah, 2005).<br />

Both industrial symbiosis projects powerfully illustrate<br />

the importance of the systemic view. Individually,<br />

firms in the projects were unsustainable, but as a<br />

system, they are sustainable. Firms can become part<br />

of sustainable systems without having to become<br />

sustainable independent of those systems 6 , which<br />

raises important questions about whether individual<br />

firms can be sustainable within unsustainable systems;<br />

this question demarcates the frontier of current thinking<br />

and practice.<br />

2. Collaborations become increasingly<br />

interdependent<br />

In Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation, firms redesign<br />

collaborations and engage with more diverse<br />

collaborators and with collaborators who previously<br />

would have been dismissed, including competitors and<br />

lobby groups (Dangelico & Pujari, 2010). Firms on their<br />

own have limited impact on sustainability challenges,<br />

which require systems solutions. There<strong>for</strong>e, the <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

and in<strong>for</strong>mal institutions of society need to come<br />

together, and firms, government, scientific institutes,<br />

NGOs and individuals need to participate in open<br />

experimentation (Loorbach, Van Bakel, Whiteman &<br />

Rotmans, 2010).<br />

6 The authors are grateful to Pam Laughland <strong>for</strong> this observation.<br />

In the base metals industry, radical innovations are<br />

rarely implemented (despite their availability) because<br />

of technologically and socially embedded production<br />

systems — the locked-in effect. A solution could be<br />

to develop and extend inter-firm knowledge networks,<br />

which are useful <strong>for</strong> knowledge cross-fertilization,<br />

especially at the pre-competitive stage. Such networks<br />

should include connections with public R&D facilities,<br />

such as universities and technological institutes (Moors<br />

& Vergragt, 2002).<br />

In the context of Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

collaborations can be complex. For example, tensions<br />

may emerge with a hostile NGO. Yet, NGOs may view<br />

industry as culpable while working collaboratively<br />

with business on innovative remedial or development<br />

programs, such as in the following example:<br />

In Practice<br />

Greenpeace worked with the German firm<br />

Foron Household Appliances to challenge<br />

established practices and propose an<br />

alternative in the manufacture and use<br />

of harmful chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)<br />

refrigerants. Greenpeace acted as a bridge,<br />

both by establishing links with mavericks,<br />

key market players and lead adopters<br />

and by linking into coalitions of supportive<br />

market players and stakeholders. Adapted<br />

from Staf<strong>for</strong>d and Hartman (2001).<br />

integrating collaborators sets the context <strong>for</strong> new<br />

product development (NPD) (Ornetzeder & Rohracher,<br />

2006).<br />

Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!