Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. Ensure functionality is not compromised<br />
Developers should ensure that sustainable products<br />
function as well as their non-sustainable alternatives<br />
(Staf<strong>for</strong>d & Hartman, 2001). A product with a<br />
sustainable profile must be just as reliable, safe,<br />
convenient, usable and aesthetically attractive as<br />
other products. However, some firms in the context<br />
of Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation have replaced<br />
this principle, <strong>for</strong> certain markets, with the idea that<br />
products need only be good enough.<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Many activities characterize SOI in the context of<br />
Operational Optimization, reflecting the range of the<br />
business response to the sustainability challenge.<br />
Operational Optimization can be pursued by modifying<br />
existing innovation capabilities, pathways, skills, project<br />
management arrangements, etc. (Seebode et al.,<br />
2012). Indeed, few studies focus on reassessing the<br />
core constructs of the innovation process (search,<br />
select, implement and capture) in the context of<br />
sustainability. Recognizably conventional processes<br />
appear to be in play, but are adapted and extended<br />
through the use of sustainability-oriented tools and<br />
techniques.<br />
By integrating sustainability principles into existing<br />
quality and process management systems, firms<br />
can make sustainability a primary consideration. For<br />
example, in a study of the integration of environmental<br />
considerations into technological innovation processes<br />
in the UK chemical industry, most firms set up systems<br />
<strong>for</strong> environmentally inclusive R&D project management<br />
(Foster & Green, 2002). Although the processes were<br />
integrative, they tended to be compliance-focused and<br />
mostly relied on checklists.<br />
These approaches are often called eco-efficient and<br />
provide guidance on addressing environmental issues<br />
from a firm and product/process perspective.<br />
These approaches make an important contribution at<br />
the firm-level, but their impact is limited and, on their<br />
own, they are insufficient to address the sustainability<br />
challenge. For example, any gains from eco-efficiency<br />
may be offset by the “rebound effect” (Carrillo-<br />
Hermosilla et al., 2010); in other words, increases in<br />
environmental efficiency may be erased by subsequent<br />
growth.<br />
The key to sustainability is not optimizing isolated<br />
parts of a system but rather enhancing the resilience<br />
of the whole (socio-ecological) system. SOI beyond<br />
Operational Optimization reflects this systemic view, the<br />
pursuit of effectiveness over efficiency. To move from<br />
Operational Optimization, firms need to extend beyond<br />
risk reduction, cost-cutting and the notion of doing<br />
less harm. Resilience refers to the ability of systems<br />
to absorb disturbance and reorganize while both<br />
undergoing change and continuing to retain essentially<br />
the same function, structure, identity and feedback<br />
(Westley et al., 2011).<br />
Such a paradigm shift in the organization and<br />
management of the enterprise is challenging. Some<br />
firms are beginning to navigate a path in which they<br />
experiment with and explore the implications of new<br />
Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 35