23.07.2013 Views

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Ensure functionality is not compromised<br />

Developers should ensure that sustainable products<br />

function as well as their non-sustainable alternatives<br />

(Staf<strong>for</strong>d & Hartman, 2001). A product with a<br />

sustainable profile must be just as reliable, safe,<br />

convenient, usable and aesthetically attractive as<br />

other products. However, some firms in the context<br />

of Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation have replaced<br />

this principle, <strong>for</strong> certain markets, with the idea that<br />

products need only be good enough.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Many activities characterize SOI in the context of<br />

Operational Optimization, reflecting the range of the<br />

business response to the sustainability challenge.<br />

Operational Optimization can be pursued by modifying<br />

existing innovation capabilities, pathways, skills, project<br />

management arrangements, etc. (Seebode et al.,<br />

2012). Indeed, few studies focus on reassessing the<br />

core constructs of the innovation process (search,<br />

select, implement and capture) in the context of<br />

sustainability. Recognizably conventional processes<br />

appear to be in play, but are adapted and extended<br />

through the use of sustainability-oriented tools and<br />

techniques.<br />

By integrating sustainability principles into existing<br />

quality and process management systems, firms<br />

can make sustainability a primary consideration. For<br />

example, in a study of the integration of environmental<br />

considerations into technological innovation processes<br />

in the UK chemical industry, most firms set up systems<br />

<strong>for</strong> environmentally inclusive R&D project management<br />

(Foster & Green, 2002). Although the processes were<br />

integrative, they tended to be compliance-focused and<br />

mostly relied on checklists.<br />

These approaches are often called eco-efficient and<br />

provide guidance on addressing environmental issues<br />

from a firm and product/process perspective.<br />

These approaches make an important contribution at<br />

the firm-level, but their impact is limited and, on their<br />

own, they are insufficient to address the sustainability<br />

challenge. For example, any gains from eco-efficiency<br />

may be offset by the “rebound effect” (Carrillo-<br />

Hermosilla et al., 2010); in other words, increases in<br />

environmental efficiency may be erased by subsequent<br />

growth.<br />

The key to sustainability is not optimizing isolated<br />

parts of a system but rather enhancing the resilience<br />

of the whole (socio-ecological) system. SOI beyond<br />

Operational Optimization reflects this systemic view, the<br />

pursuit of effectiveness over efficiency. To move from<br />

Operational Optimization, firms need to extend beyond<br />

risk reduction, cost-cutting and the notion of doing<br />

less harm. Resilience refers to the ability of systems<br />

to absorb disturbance and reorganize while both<br />

undergoing change and continuing to retain essentially<br />

the same function, structure, identity and feedback<br />

(Westley et al., 2011).<br />

Such a paradigm shift in the organization and<br />

management of the enterprise is challenging. Some<br />

firms are beginning to navigate a path in which they<br />

experiment with and explore the implications of new<br />

Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!