23.07.2013 Views

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecome the pre-eminent procedural tool <strong>for</strong> internal<br />

management (Könnölä & Unruh, 2007). However, they<br />

have been criticized <strong>for</strong> locking firms into exploiting their<br />

existing production processes rather than exploring<br />

more radical innovation opportunities.<br />

Life cycle analysis (LCA) is also widely used <strong>for</strong><br />

measuring environmental impacts and deciding on<br />

the development of new products and processes.<br />

LCA provides a clear picture of a product’s impacts<br />

throughout its life, from extraction and refinement of<br />

materials to manufacturing, transport, use, maintenance<br />

and, ultimately, end-of-life disposal; and, in doing<br />

so, LCA highlights and evaluates opportunities <strong>for</strong><br />

improvements. LCA identifies critical areas, making<br />

life cycle thinking core to the sustainable product<br />

development process. The two following cases illustrate<br />

the role of LCA in product development at Patagonia<br />

and at Michelin:<br />

In Practice<br />

Patagonia learned from an LCA that shirts<br />

made from regular cotton consume three<br />

times more petroleum in their lifetime than<br />

shirts made of synthetic fibre (due to the<br />

fertilizers used to grow the cotton and the<br />

extra ef<strong>for</strong>t needed to keep the garment<br />

clean). Recognizing that the extensive use<br />

of these chemicals harms water, soil and<br />

the health of farm workers, the company<br />

subsequently converted its sportswear<br />

lines to 100 per cent organic cotton, which<br />

requires fewer chemicals. Adapted from<br />

Ceres (2010).<br />

In Practice<br />

Michelin used an extensive LCA of tire<br />

production and learned that 86 per cent<br />

of tires’ CO2 emissions result from the<br />

rolling phase — i.e. when the tire is being<br />

used. Thus, Michelin examined how rolling<br />

resistance could be reduced to obtain higher<br />

fuel efficiency and thus lower the cost of<br />

mobility, while also producing less exhaust.<br />

The company found these objectives could<br />

be achieved by partly replacing carbon<br />

black, which is used as rein<strong>for</strong>cement filler<br />

in tires, with silica. Although on the face of<br />

it a small modification, it was a risky project<br />

that took several years, the support of raw<br />

materials suppliers and R&D investment of<br />

almost €400 million. Adapted from OECD<br />

(2010).<br />

Companies should per<strong>for</strong>m an LCA <strong>for</strong> each portfolio of<br />

products or <strong>for</strong> specific products to determine the full<br />

scope of their sustainability impacts. This assessment<br />

should identify key environmental and social<br />

implications of the choice and sourcing of inputs, the<br />

manufacturing process itself and each product’s use<br />

and disposal. Because LCA can be resource-intensive,<br />

many firms do not apply it across their full product<br />

ranges. One recommendation might be to apply LCA<br />

to new products or product modifications and to allow<br />

older products to become discontinued.<br />

Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!