Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sukhdev, P. (2012). The corporate climate overhaul. Nature, 486, 27-28. Taylor, P.L. (2005). In the market but not of it: fair trade coffee and Forest Stewardship Council certification as market based social change. World Development, 33 (1), 129-147. Thompson, A.W. (2010). Towards sustainability-driven innovation through product-service systems. PhD thesis. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden. Tidd, J. & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Tietze, F., Schiederig, T. & Herstatt, C. (2011). Firms’ transition towards green product service system innovators. R&D Management Conference. Tingström, J., Swanström, L. & Karlsson, R. (2006). Sustainability management in product development projects: the ABB experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (15-16), 1377-1385. Tiwari, R. & Herstatt, C. (2012). Frugal innovations for the “unserved” customer: an assessment of India’s attractiveness as a lead market for cost-effective products. Hamburg University of Technology: http://www.tu-harburg.de/tim/downloads/ arbeitspapiere/Working_Paper_69.pdf. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222. Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13 (4), 246-260. Tukker, A. & Tischner, U. (2006). New business for old Europe: product services, sustainability and competitiveness. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd. UN Global Compact & Rockefeller Foundation (2012). A framework for action: social enterprise and impact investing. Global Compact Office, United Nations. Van Der Kroft, T.J. (2010). Innovation strategies for the BoP: new venture development at Philips. Unpublished BSc thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology. Vergragt, P. & Van Der Wel, M. (1998). Backcasting: an example of sustainable washing. In: Roome, N. J. (ed.), Sustainable strategies for industry: the future of corporate practice. Washington, DC: Island Press. Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32 (7), 791-805. Waage, S.A. (2007). Re-considering product design: a practical “road-map” for integration of sustainability issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (7), 638-649. Innovating for Sustainability 104
Wagner, M. (2007). On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: evidence from German manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 36 (10), 1587-1602. Wagner, M. (2008). Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 66 (2/3), 392-402. Wagner, M. (2009). The links of sustainable competitiveness and innovation with openness and user integration: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 4 (4), 314-329. WCED (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., Thompson, J., Nilsson, M., Lambin, E., Sendzimir, J., Banerjee, B., Galaz, V. & Van Der Leeuw, S. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 40 (7), 762-780. Winn, M.I. & Angell, A.C. (2000). Towards a process model of corporate greening. Organization Studies, 216, 1119–1147. Winn, S. & Roome, N. (1993). R&D management responses to the environment: current theory and implications to practice and research. R&D Management, 23 (2), 147-160. Wymer, W. & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of business and nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11 (1), 3-22. Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B. & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets: the case of Mettler Toledo. Research-Technology Management, 54 (4), 38-45. Zhou, J., Tong, Y. & Li, J. (2011). Disruptive innovation in China’s BoP market. In: Kocaoglu, D. F., Anderson, T. R. & Daim, T. U. (eds.), 2011 Proceedings of Picmet 11: Technology Management in the Energy-Smart World. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. & Lai, K.-H. (2011). Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: an ecological modernization perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29 (1), 168-185. Innovating for Sustainability 105
Page 1 and 2:
innovating for sustainability A Sys
Page 3 and 4:
Through innovation, companies can b
Page 5 and 6:
Dear Reader, I’m pleased to share
Page 7 and 8:
introduction This systematic review
Page 9 and 10:
To address the needs of all firms,
Page 11 and 12:
origins of SOI and its relation to
Page 13 and 14:
customers or the acquisition of new
Page 15 and 16:
We developed our model of contexts
Page 17 and 18:
From the models reviewed, we envisi
Page 19 and 20:
Dimension 2: Stand-alone/integrated
Page 21 and 22:
OPERATIONAL OPTIMIZATION ORGANIZATI
Page 23 and 24:
The previous chapters presented a m
Page 25 and 26:
Internally, SOI can require working
Page 27 and 28:
Operational Optimizers must source
Page 29 and 30:
2. Use available tools such as envi
Page 31 and 32:
LCA has multiple variants (Kaval, 2
Page 33 and 34:
• Reducing energy and chemical us
Page 35 and 36:
4. Ensure functionality is not comp
Page 37 and 38:
In the Organizational Transformatio
Page 39 and 40:
In Practice The contribution of lon
Page 41 and 42:
sustainability goals and objectives
Page 43 and 44:
eports or as social and environment
Page 45 and 46:
PROCESS INNOVATION A number of cate
Page 47 and 48:
In Practice The cradle-to-cradle me
Page 49 and 50:
In Practice InterfaceFLOR is gradua
Page 51 and 52:
In Practice There is a potentially
Page 53 and 54: development on the needs of the poo
Page 55 and 56: such innovations. Much more difficu
Page 57 and 58: discussion Firms are re-embedding t
Page 59 and 60: competitive advantages. Third, firm
Page 61 and 62: previous reviews Earlier literature
Page 63 and 64: The current study extends these pre
Page 65 and 66: additional materials The appendices
Page 67 and 68: appendix 1: methodology The systema
Page 69 and 70: SEARCHING THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Page 71 and 72: Search methods We used the followin
Page 73 and 74: At the outset of this project, the
Page 75 and 76: Data were coded according to biblio
Page 77 and 78: Table 8 JOURNALS PROVIDING ONLY A S
Page 79 and 80: DESIGN OF STUDIES Sectoral distribu
Page 81 and 82: which speaks to the contestation ar
Page 83 and 84: The studies in our sample are mixed
Page 85 and 86: THE ELEMENTS OF INNOVATION A tradit
Page 87 and 88: appendix 3: definitions of SOI This
Page 89 and 90: SUSTAINABILITY-RELATED AND SUSTAINA
Page 91 and 92: STUDY MODEL Alexander Ballard Ltd.
Page 93 and 94: appendix 6: frugal, reverse and soc
Page 95 and 96: Benyus, J.M. (1997). Biomimicry: in
Page 97 and 98: Del Río, P., Carrillo-Hermosilla,
Page 99 and 100: Hunt, C.B. & Auster, E.R. (1990). P
Page 101 and 102: Machiba, T. (2010). Eco-innovation
Page 103: Reay, T., Berta, W. & Kohn, M.K. (2
Page 107: Network for Business Sustainability
show all

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?