23.07.2013 Views

embedding sustainability in organizational culture - Network for ...

embedding sustainability in organizational culture - Network for ...

embedding sustainability in organizational culture - Network for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1: 4: Introduction Clarify<strong>in</strong>g expectations<br />

30<br />

Employees can deliver on <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> objectives more easily if they are built<br />

<strong>in</strong>to daily operations and practices. The development of detailed standards and<br />

procedures clarifies and re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>ces expected behaviours. In short, this practice is<br />

about translat<strong>in</strong>g your ideas <strong>in</strong>to desired actions.<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>d prelim<strong>in</strong>ary support <strong>for</strong> the importance of operationaliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the research<br />

studies reviewed. Reverdy (2006) found that the translation of environmental<br />

requirements <strong>in</strong>to everyday work practices was necessary <strong>for</strong> the successful<br />

implementation of an environmental management system. Zhao (2004) found<br />

that the lack of ef<strong>for</strong>ts to l<strong>in</strong>k susta<strong>in</strong>able development to daily operations was one<br />

of the ma<strong>in</strong> causes of <strong>in</strong>action and a key h<strong>in</strong>drance to implement<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development.<br />

Both the <strong>in</strong>novation and safety literatures suggest that operationaliz<strong>in</strong>g is an<br />

important practice. Bank of America embedded a <strong>culture</strong> of <strong>in</strong>novation by provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

explicit guidance on how managers should engage with employees to achieve<br />

the organization’s goals (Beck, 1987). Becker (2008) found that <strong>in</strong>novation was<br />

embedded when behaviour change was mandated through deadl<strong>in</strong>es. Enacted<br />

<strong>for</strong>malized safety policies helped embed a safety <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> a study by Cox, Jones and<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>son (2006). They added, however, that the safety <strong>culture</strong> is weakened when<br />

policies are underm<strong>in</strong>ed by a lack of support<strong>in</strong>g management practices and when<br />

punishment rather than rewards are used.<br />

Operationaliz<strong>in</strong>g receives prelim<strong>in</strong>ary support but further research is needed to<br />

understand how best to operationalize <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong>.<br />

assessment: Weakly supported<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />

Here we explore the <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the way the<br />

organization currently operates. This <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to<br />

an organization’s mission, vision, and values; strategy; bus<strong>in</strong>ess plans; bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

processes; roles; management systems; and product design and life cycle. Through<br />

this <strong>in</strong>tegration, an organization truly commits to cultural trans<strong>for</strong>mation by<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to its core.<br />

<strong>in</strong>tEgRatE <strong>in</strong>to MiSSion, viSion and valuES: <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong><br />

values <strong>in</strong>to the organization’s mission, vision and values<br />

• Establish a new mission if one does not exist or if it does not<br />

explicitly address <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong><br />

• Update the organization’s vision to reflect what it would be like if it<br />

were truly susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

• Incorporate <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong> the organization’s values<br />

• Increase the level of priority <strong>for</strong> <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> among the<br />

organization’s values<br />

An organization’s mission, vision and values are <strong>for</strong>mal, overarch<strong>in</strong>g statements<br />

of commitment that send a clear message to its employees and other stakeholders<br />

about its position on <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong>. Practitioners noted that <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />

<strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to these elements holds everyone from board members to employees<br />

accountable <strong>for</strong> their actions and encourages employees to take <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account when mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions. Clear articulation of <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

mission, vision, and values may also help to foster alignment <strong>in</strong> an organization<br />

(Strandberg, 2009). By <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the mission, vision and<br />

values, an organization <strong>in</strong>spires and motivates employees to take obligations to the<br />

next level (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 2008) and enables leadership to challenge their people to do<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g great (Hart, 2005).<br />

There was only very prelim<strong>in</strong>ary empirical support <strong>for</strong> the value of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> <strong>in</strong>to missions, visions and values. Harris and Crane (2002) found that<br />

when <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> was <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to an organization’s mission statement, its<br />

managers sensed a change toward the support of susta<strong>in</strong>able growth.<br />

In other literature perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to <strong>embedd<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>culture</strong>, Gilbert and Ivancevich (2000)<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> that a diversity <strong>culture</strong> is embedded by mak<strong>in</strong>g diversity part of the<br />

organization’s mission, beyond what is required by regulation. In the <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

literature, Jassawalla and Sashittal (2002) describe that it is through a process<br />

of develop<strong>in</strong>g their own team mission statements <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation that<br />

employees build a sense of collective ownership, commitment, and focus and,<br />

through this, a <strong>culture</strong> of <strong>in</strong>novation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!