23.07.2013 Views

embedding sustainability in organizational culture - Network for ...

embedding sustainability in organizational culture - Network for ...

embedding sustainability in organizational culture - Network for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1: 3: Introduction Foster<strong>in</strong>g Commitment<br />

21<br />

The practice of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal recognition is mentioned frequently by practitioners and<br />

researchers. Unlike the <strong>for</strong>mal practice of <strong>in</strong>centives <strong>in</strong> which compensation is<br />

directly tied to specific <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> measures or outcomes, recognition <strong>in</strong>volves<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal attempts to <strong>in</strong>dicate approval or appreciation <strong>for</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts to improve<br />

<strong>organizational</strong> <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong>.<br />

Doppelt (2003) recommends the creation of awards as well as celebrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> successes regularly. In contrast, Willard (2009) cautions that rewards<br />

and celebrations may produce short-term results rather than long-term motivation.<br />

Based on their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, researchers have also suggested that reward<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts can help build commitment to <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> (Angel del Brio et al., 2008;<br />

Smith & Brown, 2003).<br />

In the <strong>in</strong>novation literature, Beck (1987) describes how employees adopted Bank<br />

of America’s <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>culture</strong> through small gestures of recognition. A small p<strong>in</strong><br />

presented by the CEO or high-level management gave encouragement to employees<br />

who enacted the organization’s values and refocused management styles toward<br />

promot<strong>in</strong>g and support<strong>in</strong>g these values. The chief executives <strong>in</strong> Stop<strong>for</strong>d and Baden-<br />

Fuller’s study (1994) encouraged <strong>in</strong>novation through f<strong>in</strong>ancial and status rewards<br />

<strong>for</strong> teams and <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Blackburn and Rosen (1993), <strong>in</strong> their study of <strong>embedd<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

<strong>culture</strong>s of quality improvement, f<strong>in</strong>d that awards communicate to employees that<br />

the organization values their quality improvement ef<strong>for</strong>ts.<br />

While these and other studies suggest that <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal recognition and rewards may<br />

be a mechanism to support <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts, the efficacy of different <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal<br />

rewards has not been well studied at this stage.<br />

assessment: Weakly supported<br />

signal<br />

Signall<strong>in</strong>g practices are those that serve to identify <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> as a priority <strong>for</strong> the<br />

organization. An organization’s actions send strong messages regard<strong>in</strong>g its position<br />

on <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> to its employees. This category of practices <strong>in</strong>cludes actions or<br />

gestures that serve to communicate the importance of <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> to employees <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal ways. These practices <strong>in</strong>clude committ<strong>in</strong>g publicly; modell<strong>in</strong>g; allocat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resources; self-regulat<strong>in</strong>g; adher<strong>in</strong>g; accommodat<strong>in</strong>g work life balance; and<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the community.<br />

coMMit: have the organization and/or senior leadership team make a public<br />

commitment to <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong><br />

• Make your <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> commitments public<br />

• Include <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> messages <strong>in</strong> company presentations and press<br />

releases whenever possible<br />

• Include <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> targets and per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>in</strong> company<br />

publications such as annual reports<br />

One way to signal a commitment to <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> is <strong>for</strong> the <strong>organizational</strong> leadership<br />

to speak openly about their <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> goals and their progress toward them.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to some practitioners, committ<strong>in</strong>g publicly to <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> targets can<br />

serve as a powerful motivator (NBS, 2010). There are many ways to get the message<br />

out: company presentations, speeches by senior leadership and press releases all<br />

provide opportunities to reiterate the organization’s commitment to <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong>.<br />

Mak<strong>in</strong>g commitments <strong>in</strong> your <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> report can also serve as an important<br />

driver <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal per<strong>for</strong>mance and priority sett<strong>in</strong>g by hold<strong>in</strong>g departments<br />

publically responsible <strong>for</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g these commitments (Ethical Corporation, 2009).<br />

Turn<strong>in</strong>g to the research on this topic, we f<strong>in</strong>d that an external message may have<br />

a stronger impact on <strong>organizational</strong> members than a message that is delivered<br />

only <strong>in</strong>ternally (Hagen, 2008). It also appears that lead<strong>in</strong>g companies do discuss<br />

<strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> more openly. In a study by Howard-Grenville et al. (2008), highper<strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environmental facilities were also those that were more likely to<br />

raise environmental issues <strong>in</strong> their communications with others outside of<br />

the organization. More research needs to be done to understand how public<br />

commitments drive <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> implementation.<br />

assessment: Weakly supported<br />

✔ ModEl: Enact the roles and behaviours <strong>organizational</strong> leadership wishes<br />

employees to emulate<br />

• Demonstrate <strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> leadership by ‘walk<strong>in</strong>g the walk’ and<br />

‘talk<strong>in</strong>g the talk’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!