Download File - Computer Networks & Information Security
Download File - Computer Networks & Information Security Download File - Computer Networks & Information Security
Route Discovery in CEDAR When a node S wants to send packets to destination D Node S informs its dominator core node B Node B finds a route in the core network to the core node E which is the dominator for destination D This is done by means of a DSR-like route discovery (but somewhat optimized) process among the core nodes Core nodes on the above route then build a route from S to D using locally available link state information Route from S to D may or may not include core nodes 154
H G B CEDAR: Core Maintenance A C E S J K A core node D F 155
- Page 103 and 104: Timeouts A routing table entry mai
- Page 105 and 106: Route Error When node X is unable
- Page 107 and 108: Link Failure Detection Hello messa
- Page 109 and 110: Why Sequence Numbers in AODV A B C
- Page 111 and 112: Summary: AODV Routes need not be i
- Page 113 and 114: Link Reversal Algorithm [Gafni81] A
- Page 115 and 116: Link Reversal Algorithm A B F C E G
- Page 117 and 118: Link Reversal Algorithm A B F C E G
- Page 119 and 120: Link Reversal Algorithm A B F C E G
- Page 121 and 122: Link Reversal Algorithm Attempts t
- Page 123 and 124: Partial Reversal Method A B F C E G
- Page 125 and 126: Partial Reversal Method A B F C E G
- Page 127 and 128: Partial Reversal Method A B F C E G
- Page 129 and 130: Link Reversal Methods: Advantages
- Page 131 and 132: Link Reversal in a Partitioned Netw
- Page 133 and 134: Full Reversal in a Partitioned Netw
- Page 135 and 136: Full Reversal in a Partitioned Netw
- Page 137 and 138: Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorith
- Page 139 and 140: E D Partition Detection in TORA A N
- Page 141 and 142: E D Partition Detection in TORA A N
- Page 143 and 144: E D Partition Detection in TORA A F
- Page 145 and 146: E D Partition Detection in TORA A F
- Page 147 and 148: TORA Design Decision TORA performs
- Page 149 and 150: So far ... All nodes had identical
- Page 151 and 152: Core-Extraction Distributed Ad Hoc
- Page 153: Link State Propagation in CEDAR Th
- Page 157 and 158: H G B CEDAR Route Discovery A C E S
- Page 159 and 160: Advantages CEDAR Route discovery/ma
- Page 161 and 162: Proactive Protocols Most of the sc
- Page 163 and 164: Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)
- Page 165 and 166: Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)
- Page 167 and 168: OLSR OLSR floods information throu
- Page 169 and 170: Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vect
- Page 171 and 172: Hybrid Protocols 171
- Page 173 and 174: ZRP All nodes within hop distance
- Page 175 and 176: B F ZRP: Example with Zone Radius =
- Page 177 and 178: B F ZRP: Example with d = 2 A S C D
- Page 179 and 180: LANMAR Routing to Nodes Within Scop
- Page 181 and 182: LANMAR Routing to Nodes Outside Sco
- Page 183 and 184: Geodesic Routing Without Anchors [B
- Page 185 and 186: Routing Protocols discussed so far
- Page 187 and 188: Other Routing Protocols Plenty of
- Page 189 and 190: Power-Aware Routing [Singh98Mobicom
- Page 191 and 192: Power-Aware Routing Possible modifi
- Page 193 and 194: Associativity-Based Routing (ABR) [
- Page 195 and 196: Preemptive Routing [Goff01MobiCom]
- Page 197 and 198: Quality-of-Service Several proposa
- Page 199 and 200: Multicasting in Mobile Ad Hoc Netwo
- Page 201 and 202: Multicasting in MANET Need to take
- Page 203 and 204: AODV Group Sequence Number In our
Route Discovery in CEDAR<br />
When a node S wants to send packets to destination D<br />
Node S informs its dominator core node B<br />
Node B finds a route in the core network to the core<br />
node E which is the dominator for destination D<br />
This is done by means of a DSR-like route discovery (but<br />
somewhat optimized) process among the core nodes<br />
Core nodes on the above route then build a route<br />
from S to D using locally available link state<br />
information<br />
Route from S to D may or may not include core<br />
nodes<br />
154