22.07.2013 Views

No. 237 Maritime Archaeology in the People's Republic of China ...

No. 237 Maritime Archaeology in the People's Republic of China ...

No. 237 Maritime Archaeology in the People's Republic of China ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 88. Photograph at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> excavation show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> various<br />

layers <strong>of</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Figure 89.<br />

40<br />

Sketch <strong>of</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> plank jo<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

plank<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g irregularly nailed with light nails to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

plank<strong>in</strong>g. The garboard strake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outer plank<strong>in</strong>g covers<br />

<strong>the</strong> seam between <strong>in</strong>ner plank<strong>in</strong>g garboard and <strong>the</strong> keel, with<br />

an additional plank attached to <strong>the</strong> vertical surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> keel<br />

as a sheath<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The rabbeted cl<strong>in</strong>ker seams on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner plank<strong>in</strong>g are cut<br />

so that <strong>the</strong> thickness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strake on <strong>the</strong><br />

outside is 50 mm. This allows <strong>the</strong> plank edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 50mm<br />

thick outer plank<strong>in</strong>g to fit neatly <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ker step and<br />

form a smooth carvel-like jo<strong>in</strong>t. The next strake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outer<br />

plank<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong>n attached with a cl<strong>in</strong>ker lap, <strong>the</strong> arrangement<br />

is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig.<br />

From <strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> planks appear to have<br />

been whole sawn from logs that were not very much greater<br />

<strong>in</strong> diameter than <strong>the</strong> width <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> planks. In some cases it<br />

is possible to judge that <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plank which shows<br />

timber from closest to <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al tree is used<br />

on <strong>the</strong> outside face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g, but it is not certa<strong>in</strong> that<br />

this was a general rule. There is no sign <strong>of</strong> charr<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />

Figure 90.<br />

View look<strong>in</strong>g aft.<br />

<strong>in</strong>ner surfaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g, so, it is unlikely that heat was<br />

used to pre-bend <strong>the</strong> planks to shape (this technique is less<br />

successful with conifers than with hard woods <strong>in</strong> any case).<br />

If <strong>the</strong> planks were simply forced <strong>in</strong>to shape, <strong>the</strong> rabbeted<br />

plank edges would be important for hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> edges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

planks <strong>in</strong> alignment dur<strong>in</strong>g assembly. The very gentle curves<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bow-buttock l<strong>in</strong>es reflect smooth and gentle curves <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g which are consistent with <strong>the</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g bent <strong>in</strong>to<br />

place to form a plank shell <strong>in</strong> a plank-first constructed hull.<br />

There would be some <strong>in</strong>itial difficulty <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> required<br />

bend at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> each midship plank, but <strong>the</strong> rabbet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

subsequent strake and <strong>the</strong> later fasten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> that strake by iron<br />

brackets to <strong>the</strong> adjacent bulkhead would clamp <strong>the</strong> plank butts<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> required smooth curve. The position<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> brackets <strong>in</strong><br />

strakes immediately above and below plank butts is obvious<br />

a deliberate part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> design The details and significance <strong>of</strong><br />

this are discussed below.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> fourth cl<strong>in</strong>ker jo<strong>in</strong>t on <strong>the</strong> outer plank<strong>in</strong>g, at <strong>the</strong> turn<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bilge, a third layer <strong>of</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g is applied to <strong>the</strong> hull.<br />

This plank<strong>in</strong>g is 25 mm thick and is carvel jo<strong>in</strong>ed, cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for five strakes to <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hull rema<strong>in</strong>s. The authors’<br />

impression was that <strong>the</strong> second layer <strong>of</strong> plank<strong>in</strong>g was reduced<br />

to <strong>the</strong> same thickness so that <strong>the</strong> two layers were toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

same thickness as <strong>the</strong> outer layer on <strong>the</strong> lower hull, however<br />

this has not been confirmed by measurement.<br />

The rabbeted cl<strong>in</strong>ker seams taper <strong>in</strong>to rabbeted carvel<br />

seams towards <strong>the</strong> bow, presumably to facilitate <strong>the</strong>ir entry<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> rabbet on <strong>the</strong> stem or fore keel. Aft <strong>the</strong>y are carried<br />

right through to <strong>the</strong> transom. The seam between <strong>the</strong> garboard<br />

strake and second strake is not rabbeted through <strong>the</strong> midbody<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hull, because <strong>the</strong> angle at which <strong>the</strong> two strakes meet <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> midbody is too great for a rabbetted seam to be effectively<br />

employed. The bottom edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second strake appears to be<br />

fitted to <strong>the</strong> outside surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> garboard, but as <strong>the</strong> sectional<br />

shape changes towards <strong>the</strong> bow and stern <strong>the</strong> two strake come<br />

more <strong>in</strong>to alignment and a rabbetted cl<strong>in</strong>ker seam develops.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two strakes is poor and it was<br />

not possible to be sure exactly how <strong>the</strong>y fitted toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

apparent transition to a cl<strong>in</strong>ker jo<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

It has previously been assumed that <strong>the</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ker steps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ner plank<strong>in</strong>g are fairly close to <strong>the</strong> steps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> outer plank<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

but this is not so. In some places <strong>the</strong> steps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two layers are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!