22.07.2013 Views

A review of the family-group names for - BioOne

A review of the family-group names for - BioOne

A review of the family-group names for - BioOne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

162 COLEOPTERISTS SOCIETY MONOGRAPH NUMBER 5, 2006<br />

Synonym: Alloscelini Janssens, 1946<br />

Original spelling and citation: Alloscelides Janssens 1946: 10<br />

Type genus: Alloscelus Boucomont, 1923: 1<br />

Tribe SCARABAEINI Latreille, 1802<br />

Original spelling and citation: Scarabæïdes Latreille 1802: 144<br />

Type genus: Scarabaeus Linnaeus, 1758: 345<br />

Synonym: Pachysomatini Ferreira, 1953<br />

Original spelling and citation: Pachysomides Ferreira, 1953: 8<br />

Type genus: Pachysoma MacLeay, 1821: 507<br />

Synonym: Actinophorini Ádám, 2003<br />

Original spelling and citation: Actinophorini Ádám 2003: 130<br />

Type genus: Actinophorus Creutzer, 1799: 79*<br />

Remark: The genus Actinophorus is a junior synonym <strong>of</strong> Scarabaeus <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>family</strong>-<strong>group</strong> name Actinophorini is a synonym <strong>of</strong> Scarabaeini.<br />

Tribe PHANAEINI Kolbe, 1905<br />

Original spelling and citation: Phanaeinae Kolbe 1905: 550<br />

Type genus: Phanaeus MacLeay, 1819: 124<br />

Tribe SISYPHINI Mulsant, 1842<br />

Original spelling and citation: Sisyphaires Mulsant 1842: 41<br />

Type genus: Sisyphus Latreille, 1807: 79<br />

Remark: Although this <strong>family</strong>-<strong>group</strong> name was not originally proposed in<br />

a Latinized <strong>for</strong>m, it has subsequently been Latinized by numerous authors and<br />

should be considered available under Article 11.7.2. The original spelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

type genus is Sisyphe, however, <strong>the</strong> incorrect subsequent spelling Sisyphus is in<br />

prevailing usage and should be considered <strong>the</strong> correct original spelling (Article<br />

33.3.1).<br />

{Sub<strong>family</strong> PROTOTROGINAE Nikolajev, 2000<br />

Original spelling and citation: Prototroginae Nikolajev 2000a: 63<br />

Type genus: Prototrox Nikolajev, 2000: 65 (Nikolajev 2000a)<br />

{Sub<strong>family</strong> CRETOSCARABAEINAE Nikolajev, 1995<br />

Original spelling and citation: Cretoscarabaeinae Nikolajev 1995b: 147<br />

Type genus: Cretoscarabaeus Nikolajev, 1995: 147 (Nikolajev 1995b)<br />

Sub<strong>family</strong> DYNAMOPODINAE Arrow, 1911<br />

Original spelling and citation: Dynamopinæ Arrow 1911b: 611<br />

Type genus: Dynamopus Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1895: 336<br />

Remark: Lawrence and Newton (1995) corrected <strong>the</strong> stem <strong>of</strong> this <strong>family</strong>-<strong>group</strong> name.<br />

Sub<strong>family</strong> PHAENOMERIDINAE Erichson, 1847<br />

Original spelling and citation: Phaenomerini Erichson 1847b: 655<br />

Type genus: Phaenomeris Hope, 1833: 62<br />

Remark: The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1962) emended<br />

<strong>the</strong> stem <strong>of</strong> this <strong>family</strong>-<strong>group</strong> name from Phaenomer- to Phaenomerid- thus removing<br />

it from homonymy with ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>family</strong>-<strong>group</strong> name. In this ruling, ‘‘Ohaus, 1913’’<br />

was erroneously given as <strong>the</strong> original author <strong>of</strong> this <strong>family</strong>-<strong>group</strong> name.<br />

Sub<strong>family</strong> ORPHNINAE Erichson, 1847<br />

Original spelling and citation: Orphnidae Erichson 1847a: 111<br />

Type genus: Orphnus MacLeay, 1819: 119<br />

Tribe ORPHNINI Erichson, 1847<br />

Original spelling and citation: Orphnidae Erichson 1847a: 111<br />

Type genus: Orphnus MacLeay, 1819: 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!