Re-evaluating the Very Hot Gas Giant WASP-12b
Re-evaluating the Very Hot Gas Giant WASP-12b
Re-evaluating the Very Hot Gas Giant WASP-12b
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Re</strong>-<strong>evaluating</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Very</strong> <strong>Hot</strong><br />
<strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Giant</strong> <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />
Ian Crossfield (MPIA)<br />
2012.07.17<br />
Work done in collaboration with:<br />
Travis Barman, Brad Hansen,<br />
and Ichi Tanaka<br />
1
Summary of <strong>Re</strong>sults:<br />
● An M0V star located only 1'' from <strong>WASP</strong>-12 has<br />
diluted past eclipse and transit analyses (by >1σ).<br />
● In a narrow band (2.315 µm), <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>'s eclipse is<br />
marginally deeper: T B = 3600 ± 200 K.<br />
● <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> has a nearly iso<strong>the</strong>rmal NIR<br />
photosphere, and its composition cannot be<br />
meaningfully constrained with present eclipse<br />
measurements.<br />
2
E<br />
Transiting Planets with Measured Masses:<br />
Sub-Neptunes/<br />
Super-Earths<br />
<strong>Hot</strong><br />
Jupiters<br />
3
Transiting Planets with Measured Masses:<br />
E<br />
<strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />
4
The Extreme Planet <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />
Period ~ 1 day<br />
Eq. Temp ~ 3,000 K<br />
Radius ~ 1.7 R_Jup<br />
Density ~ 0.3 g/cc<br />
Li+2010<br />
5
Modeling of initial eclipse photometry<br />
suggested that C/O ≥ 1 for <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />
Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />
Croll+2011<br />
Campo+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
6
Modeling of initial eclipse photometry<br />
suggested that C/O ≥ 1 for <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />
Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />
Croll+2011<br />
Campo+2011<br />
chi^2 ~ 10<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
7
Modeling of initial eclipse photometry<br />
suggested that C/O ≥ 1 for <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />
Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />
Croll+2011<br />
Campo+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
8
Step 1: Subaru/MOIRCS narrowband 2.3 µm<br />
secondary eclipse photometry of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />
9
DATA &<br />
MODEL<br />
(photometry<br />
binned for plotting)<br />
RESIDUALS<br />
TIME →<br />
Crossfield et al.<br />
submitted<br />
Narrowband 2.3µm<br />
eclipse is deeper<br />
than expected:<br />
0.41 +/- 0.05 %.<br />
Duration and time of<br />
eclipse are as expected.<br />
10
Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />
Croll+2011<br />
Campo+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
11
Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />
Croll+2011<br />
Cowan+2012<br />
Campo+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
Madhusudhan+2011<br />
12
Campo+2011<br />
Cowan+2012<br />
4.5µm Eclipses of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />
0.382 ± 0.019 %<br />
0.39 ± 0.03 %<br />
(very prolate planet)<br />
Or<br />
0.50 ± 0.04 %<br />
(non-prolate planet)<br />
13
Campo+2011<br />
Cowan+2012<br />
4.5µm Eclipses of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />
0.382 ± 0.019 %<br />
A consistent analysis of all Spitzer data,<br />
and fur<strong>the</strong>r measurements, are called for!<br />
0.39 ± 0.03 %<br />
(very prolate planet)<br />
Or<br />
0.50 ± 0.04 %<br />
(non-prolate planet)<br />
14
A fainter star very close to <strong>WASP</strong>-12<br />
has diluted past eclipse measurements<br />
Δi = 4.0 mag<br />
Bergfors et al. 2011,<br />
Bergfors et al. submitted<br />
Bergfors-2<br />
See Carolina<br />
Bergfors' poster!<br />
15
Step 2: IRTF/SpeX Imaging of<br />
<strong>WASP</strong>-12 and Bergfors-2.<br />
16
IRTF/SpeX K-band imaging shows that<br />
Bergfors-2 is redder than <strong>WASP</strong>-12<br />
Δi = 4.0 mag<br />
Bergfors et al. 2011<br />
ΔK = 2.5 mag<br />
Eclipse dilution is greater at longer λ<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
17
Step 3: Archival Keck2/NIRSPEC spectra of<br />
<strong>WASP</strong>-12 and its nearby, faint companion<br />
18
Transit/Eclipse<br />
contamination<br />
Keck/NIRSPEC spectra reveal<br />
Bergfors-2 to be an M0 dwarf:<br />
Data<br />
Model<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
19
<strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> spectrum (as measured):<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
20
Dilution-corrected planetary spectrum:<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
21
The dilution-<br />
corrected planetary<br />
spectrum is very<br />
nearly a blackbody:<br />
chi^2 k BIC<br />
Blackbody ~15 2 19<br />
C/O > 1 ~10 >10 >32<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
22
The similarly hot (~3200 K)<br />
planet <strong>WASP</strong>-18b also closely<br />
matches a blackbody:<br />
chi^2 k BIC<br />
Blackbody 7 2 10<br />
Rad. Transf. ~4 >6 >12<br />
Nymeyer+2011<br />
23
The dilution-<br />
corrected planetary<br />
spectrum is very<br />
nearly a blackbody:<br />
A high C/O ratio cannot be defended<br />
when a two-parameter (blackbody) model fits as well<br />
as do many-parameter (radiative-transfer) models.<br />
chi^2 k BIC<br />
Blackbody ~15 2 19<br />
C/O > 1 ~10 >10 >32<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
24
A high C/O ratio cannot be defended<br />
when a two-parameter (blackbody) model fits as well<br />
as do many-parameter (radiative-transfer) models.<br />
chi^2 k BIC<br />
Blackbody ~25 2 29<br />
C/O > 1 ~10 >10 >32<br />
25
The dilution-<br />
corrected planetary<br />
spectrum is very<br />
nearly a blackbody:<br />
Preliminary!<br />
See Ernst de<br />
Mooij's poster.<br />
Swain et al.,<br />
submitted<br />
chi^2 k BIC<br />
Blackbody ~15 2 19<br />
C/O > 1 ~10 >6 >23<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
26
Followup<br />
observations will<br />
confirm whe<strong>the</strong>r we<br />
are seeing excess<br />
2.3µm emission ---><br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
27
Step 4: Keck1/MOSFIRE Multi-Object<br />
Eclipse Spectroscopy of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />
scheduled for Oct. 2012<br />
28
Conclusions:<br />
● An M0 dwarf is located only 1” from<br />
<strong>WASP</strong>-12: observers must correct for<br />
this object! Also: is it physically<br />
associated with <strong>WASP</strong>-12?<br />
● <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> has a nearly iso<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />
NIR photosphere, so its C/O ratio<br />
cannot be uesfully constrained with<br />
<strong>the</strong> present data.<br />
● Controversies remain:<br />
● How prolate is <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>?<br />
● What is <strong>the</strong> correct 4.5 µm flux?<br />
● Additional Spitzer measurements can<br />
resolve both <strong>the</strong>se issues!<br />
Crossfield et al., submitted<br />
29
<strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> 2.315µm eclipse:<br />
<strong>Re</strong>sidual behavior<br />
Ingress timescale<br />
31
de Mooij poster;<br />
Preliminary!<br />
Swain et al.,<br />
submitted<br />
??<br />
32
Planet/Star Flux Density (10 -3 )<br />
More physically motivated models<br />
do not significantly improve <strong>the</strong> fit.<br />
z J H K 3.6 4.5 5.8 8.0<br />
A high C/O ratio cannot be defended<br />
when a two-parameter (blackbody) model fits as well<br />
as many-parameter (radiative-transfer) models.<br />
33
Planet/Star Flux Density (10 -3 )<br />
Followup observations will confirm whe<strong>the</strong>r we<br />
are seeing excess narrowband emission.<br />
z J H K 3.6 4.5 5.8 8.0<br />
34