22.07.2013 Views

Re-evaluating the Very Hot Gas Giant WASP-12b

Re-evaluating the Very Hot Gas Giant WASP-12b

Re-evaluating the Very Hot Gas Giant WASP-12b

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Re</strong>-<strong>evaluating</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Very</strong> <strong>Hot</strong><br />

<strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Giant</strong> <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />

Ian Crossfield (MPIA)<br />

2012.07.17<br />

Work done in collaboration with:<br />

Travis Barman, Brad Hansen,<br />

and Ichi Tanaka<br />

1


Summary of <strong>Re</strong>sults:<br />

● An M0V star located only 1'' from <strong>WASP</strong>-12 has<br />

diluted past eclipse and transit analyses (by >1σ).<br />

● In a narrow band (2.315 µm), <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>'s eclipse is<br />

marginally deeper: T B = 3600 ± 200 K.<br />

● <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> has a nearly iso<strong>the</strong>rmal NIR<br />

photosphere, and its composition cannot be<br />

meaningfully constrained with present eclipse<br />

measurements.<br />

2


E<br />

Transiting Planets with Measured Masses:<br />

Sub-Neptunes/<br />

Super-Earths<br />

<strong>Hot</strong><br />

Jupiters<br />

3


Transiting Planets with Measured Masses:<br />

E<br />

<strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />

4


The Extreme Planet <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />

Period ~ 1 day<br />

Eq. Temp ~ 3,000 K<br />

Radius ~ 1.7 R_Jup<br />

Density ~ 0.3 g/cc<br />

Li+2010<br />

5


Modeling of initial eclipse photometry<br />

suggested that C/O ≥ 1 for <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />

Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />

Croll+2011<br />

Campo+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

6


Modeling of initial eclipse photometry<br />

suggested that C/O ≥ 1 for <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />

Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />

Croll+2011<br />

Campo+2011<br />

chi^2 ~ 10<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

7


Modeling of initial eclipse photometry<br />

suggested that C/O ≥ 1 for <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />

Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />

Croll+2011<br />

Campo+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

8


Step 1: Subaru/MOIRCS narrowband 2.3 µm<br />

secondary eclipse photometry of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong><br />

9


DATA &<br />

MODEL<br />

(photometry<br />

binned for plotting)<br />

RESIDUALS<br />

TIME →<br />

Crossfield et al.<br />

submitted<br />

Narrowband 2.3µm<br />

eclipse is deeper<br />

than expected:<br />

0.41 +/- 0.05 %.<br />

Duration and time of<br />

eclipse are as expected.<br />

10


Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />

Croll+2011<br />

Campo+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

11


Planet/star Flux Ratio (10 -3 )<br />

Croll+2011<br />

Cowan+2012<br />

Campo+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

Madhusudhan+2011<br />

12


Campo+2011<br />

Cowan+2012<br />

4.5µm Eclipses of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />

0.382 ± 0.019 %<br />

0.39 ± 0.03 %<br />

(very prolate planet)<br />

Or<br />

0.50 ± 0.04 %<br />

(non-prolate planet)<br />

13


Campo+2011<br />

Cowan+2012<br />

4.5µm Eclipses of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />

0.382 ± 0.019 %<br />

A consistent analysis of all Spitzer data,<br />

and fur<strong>the</strong>r measurements, are called for!<br />

0.39 ± 0.03 %<br />

(very prolate planet)<br />

Or<br />

0.50 ± 0.04 %<br />

(non-prolate planet)<br />

14


A fainter star very close to <strong>WASP</strong>-12<br />

has diluted past eclipse measurements<br />

Δi = 4.0 mag<br />

Bergfors et al. 2011,<br />

Bergfors et al. submitted<br />

Bergfors-2<br />

See Carolina<br />

Bergfors' poster!<br />

15


Step 2: IRTF/SpeX Imaging of<br />

<strong>WASP</strong>-12 and Bergfors-2.<br />

16


IRTF/SpeX K-band imaging shows that<br />

Bergfors-2 is redder than <strong>WASP</strong>-12<br />

Δi = 4.0 mag<br />

Bergfors et al. 2011<br />

ΔK = 2.5 mag<br />

Eclipse dilution is greater at longer λ<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

17


Step 3: Archival Keck2/NIRSPEC spectra of<br />

<strong>WASP</strong>-12 and its nearby, faint companion<br />

18


Transit/Eclipse<br />

contamination<br />

Keck/NIRSPEC spectra reveal<br />

Bergfors-2 to be an M0 dwarf:<br />

Data<br />

Model<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

19


<strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> spectrum (as measured):<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

20


Dilution-corrected planetary spectrum:<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

21


The dilution-<br />

corrected planetary<br />

spectrum is very<br />

nearly a blackbody:<br />

chi^2 k BIC<br />

Blackbody ~15 2 19<br />

C/O > 1 ~10 >10 >32<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

22


The similarly hot (~3200 K)<br />

planet <strong>WASP</strong>-18b also closely<br />

matches a blackbody:<br />

chi^2 k BIC<br />

Blackbody 7 2 10<br />

Rad. Transf. ~4 >6 >12<br />

Nymeyer+2011<br />

23


The dilution-<br />

corrected planetary<br />

spectrum is very<br />

nearly a blackbody:<br />

A high C/O ratio cannot be defended<br />

when a two-parameter (blackbody) model fits as well<br />

as do many-parameter (radiative-transfer) models.<br />

chi^2 k BIC<br />

Blackbody ~15 2 19<br />

C/O > 1 ~10 >10 >32<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

24


A high C/O ratio cannot be defended<br />

when a two-parameter (blackbody) model fits as well<br />

as do many-parameter (radiative-transfer) models.<br />

chi^2 k BIC<br />

Blackbody ~25 2 29<br />

C/O > 1 ~10 >10 >32<br />

25


The dilution-<br />

corrected planetary<br />

spectrum is very<br />

nearly a blackbody:<br />

Preliminary!<br />

See Ernst de<br />

Mooij's poster.<br />

Swain et al.,<br />

submitted<br />

chi^2 k BIC<br />

Blackbody ~15 2 19<br />

C/O > 1 ~10 >6 >23<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

26


Followup<br />

observations will<br />

confirm whe<strong>the</strong>r we<br />

are seeing excess<br />

2.3µm emission ---><br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

27


Step 4: Keck1/MOSFIRE Multi-Object<br />

Eclipse Spectroscopy of <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>:<br />

scheduled for Oct. 2012<br />

28


Conclusions:<br />

● An M0 dwarf is located only 1” from<br />

<strong>WASP</strong>-12: observers must correct for<br />

this object! Also: is it physically<br />

associated with <strong>WASP</strong>-12?<br />

● <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> has a nearly iso<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

NIR photosphere, so its C/O ratio<br />

cannot be uesfully constrained with<br />

<strong>the</strong> present data.<br />

● Controversies remain:<br />

● How prolate is <strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong>?<br />

● What is <strong>the</strong> correct 4.5 µm flux?<br />

● Additional Spitzer measurements can<br />

resolve both <strong>the</strong>se issues!<br />

Crossfield et al., submitted<br />

29


<strong>WASP</strong>-<strong>12b</strong> 2.315µm eclipse:<br />

<strong>Re</strong>sidual behavior<br />

Ingress timescale<br />

31


de Mooij poster;<br />

Preliminary!<br />

Swain et al.,<br />

submitted<br />

??<br />

32


Planet/Star Flux Density (10 -3 )<br />

More physically motivated models<br />

do not significantly improve <strong>the</strong> fit.<br />

z J H K 3.6 4.5 5.8 8.0<br />

A high C/O ratio cannot be defended<br />

when a two-parameter (blackbody) model fits as well<br />

as many-parameter (radiative-transfer) models.<br />

33


Planet/Star Flux Density (10 -3 )<br />

Followup observations will confirm whe<strong>the</strong>r we<br />

are seeing excess narrowband emission.<br />

z J H K 3.6 4.5 5.8 8.0<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!