22.07.2013 Views

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regression<br />

The data collected may be used to construct the regression<br />

equation for the calibration line.<br />

The reliability of the calibration line generated was done<br />

in the following manner on a SHIMADZU Model UV16OU<br />

Spectrophotometer. Four “fresh” ECN-2 and ECP-2D,<br />

“KUL” bleach solutions were prepared containing 0.2515,<br />

1.0235, 2.0296, and 3.0401 g/L iron(II). Each solution was<br />

analyzed in triplicate to create a linear regression (based on<br />

12 data points). The average standard deviation (1s) for the<br />

linear regression was 0.007 g/L iron(II), corresponding to a<br />

95 percent confidence estimate of ± 0.015 g/L. Each<br />

laboratory should calibrate its spectrophotometer; otherwise,<br />

an unknown bias may exist.<br />

Process ECN-2<br />

g wt of Fe(NH 4) 2(SO 4) 2 6H 2O g/L Iron(II) Absorbance<br />

at 510 nm<br />

Process ECP-2D<br />

0.0887 0.2520 0.117<br />

0.0887 0.2520 0.114<br />

0.0887 0.2520 0.117<br />

0.3562 1.0121 0.422<br />

0.3562 1.0121 0.420<br />

0.3562 1.0121 0.422<br />

0.7101 2.0177 0.835<br />

0.7101 2.0177 0.821<br />

0.7101 2.0177 0.839<br />

1.0658 3.0381 1.239<br />

1.0658 3.0381 1.231<br />

1.0658 3.0381 1.234<br />

g wt of Fe(NH 4 ) 2 (SO 4 ) 2 6H 2 O g/L Iron(II) Absorbance<br />

at 510 nm<br />

0.0885 0.2515 0.132<br />

0.0885 0.2515 0.129<br />

0.0885 0.2515 0.132<br />

0.3602 1.0235 0.435<br />

0.3602 1.0235 0.435<br />

0.3602 1.0235 0.435<br />

0.7143 2.0296 0.844<br />

0.7143 2.0296 0.842<br />

0.7143 2.0296 0.840<br />

1.0665 3.0401 1.250<br />

1.0665 3.0401 1.245<br />

1.0665 3.0401 1.255<br />

Figure 1<br />

Calibration of Iron(II) in ECN-2, “KUL” Bleach<br />

0<br />

0<br />

F002_0936AC<br />

ABS. @ 510 nm<br />

Figure 2<br />

Calibration of Iron(II) in ECP-2D, “KUL” Bleach<br />

This data was then processed by a least squares linear<br />

regression to develop the line, y = mx + b.<br />

where:<br />

y = grams per litre of iron(II)<br />

m = Slope of the line or the relation between<br />

absorbance and iron(II) concentration determined<br />

during calibration [(g/L)/absorbance]<br />

x = absorbance of sample at 510 nm<br />

b = the calibration intercept of the line with the y-axis<br />

(g/L, Fe(II))<br />

The equation generated using the above data was:<br />

iron(II), g/L = 2.49 (A 510 ) – 0.068<br />

y = 2.4889x - 0.0677<br />

R2 = 0.9999<br />

4 <strong>Processing</strong> KODAK Motion Picture Films, Module 3, Analytical Procedures H24.03<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

F002_0935AC<br />

0.2<br />

0.4<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

ABS. @ 510 nm<br />

1<br />

1.2<br />

y = 2.4889x - 0.0677<br />

R2 = 0.9999<br />

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!