22.07.2013 Views

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Potentiometric Determination of Total Alkalinity of EASTMAN Color Films Developer<br />

ECN-0001/1<br />

ECP-0001/1<br />

Process ECN-2 ECP-2D VNF-1/LC RVNP<br />

Formulas SD-49<br />

SD-50<br />

SD-51<br />

TBD TBD<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The total alkalinity of a photoprocessing solution is defined<br />

as the millilitres of 0.1000 N sulfuric acid required to adjust<br />

a specified volume of photoprocessing solution to a pH of<br />

4.3. To determine total alkalinity, a pH meter with a pH<br />

indicator electrode and a calomel reference electrode is<br />

calibrated according to the procedure described in Method<br />

ULM-191-2, pH Measurement of Photographic <strong>Processing</strong><br />

Solutions, or subsequent pH method. A specified volume of<br />

photoprocessing solution is titrated to a pH of 4.3 with<br />

0.1000 N sulfuric acid. The volume of sample used in the<br />

titration must be reported along with the mL of 0.1000 N<br />

sulfuric acid required for the titration<br />

A pH of 4.3 was chosen for the end point because, when<br />

titrated with acid, most buffering constituents in<br />

photoprocessing solutions show an inflection point near 4.3.<br />

The end point determination will be more precise when the<br />

pH of the solution is changing quickly (near an inflection<br />

point) than when the pH is changing very gradually.<br />

Use of this methods requires handling of potentially<br />

hazardous chemicals. Material Safety Data Sheets should be<br />

consulted for each chemical before use. These can be<br />

obtained from each chemical supplier.<br />

PRECISION AND BIAS<br />

A fresh tank solution was analyzed four times on one day by<br />

both a manual and an automated titration. The manual<br />

titration was performed by an experienced analyst. The<br />

automated titration was supported by a robotic sample<br />

handling system.<br />

A replenisher sample and a seasoned developer tank<br />

sample were obtained from a processor and were analyzed as<br />

received in the same manner as the fresh sample.<br />

Repeatability Standard Deviation, 1s r<br />

All values are expressed in units of mL of 0.1000 N sulfuric<br />

acid, and were determined using a sample size of 5.00 mL.<br />

ECN-2 Developer<br />

Manual Method,<br />

1S r<br />

Automated Method,<br />

1S r<br />

Fresh Tank 0.0 0.06<br />

Seasoned Tank 0.0 0.81<br />

Replenisher 0.082 1.92<br />

ECP-2D<br />

Developer<br />

Manual Method,<br />

1S r<br />

Automated Method,<br />

1S r<br />

Fresh Tank 0.05 0.05<br />

Seasoned Tank 0.08 0.71<br />

0.05 0.05 0.70<br />

95 Percent Confidence Estimate<br />

(not including bias)<br />

The 95 percent confidence estimate (calculated using the<br />

repeatability standard deviation) around a single test result<br />

will include the mean total alkalinity 95 percent of the time.<br />

ECN-2<br />

95 Percent Confidence Estimate<br />

Developer Sample Manual Method Automated Method<br />

Fresh Tank ± 0.0 ± 0.18<br />

Seasoned Tank ± 0.0 ± 2.60<br />

Replenisher ± 0.26 ± 6.12<br />

ECP-2D 95 Percent Confidence Estimate<br />

Developer Sample Manual Method Automated Method<br />

Fresh Tank ± 0.16 ± 0.16<br />

Seasoned Tank ± 0.26 ± 2.25<br />

Replenisher ± 0.16 ± 2.24<br />

Comparison of Precision for Manual and<br />

Automated Procedures<br />

The total alkalinity of forty-one photoprocessing solutions<br />

from fourteen different photoprocesses * were determined<br />

four times each by both the manual and automated<br />

<strong>procedures</strong> described here. The manual procedure was<br />

performed by an experienced analyst. The standard<br />

deviations resulting from the manual titrations were pooled,<br />

as were the standard deviations of the automated titration<br />

results. The pooled standard deviations (n=41) represent a<br />

good estimate of the variability for each procedure.<br />

Procedure Pooled Standard Deviation<br />

Manual 0.13<br />

Automated 0.41<br />

Note: The precision study for the manual method was<br />

performed by a single, experienced analyst. If a multiple<br />

analyst study were performed, the pooled standard deviation<br />

would likely be greater than the pooled standard deviation of<br />

the automated method.<br />

* PROSTAR, POLYMAX, RP X-OMAT, ULTRTEC, X-OMAT RA/30,<br />

C-41, E-6, ECN-2, ECP-2, EP-2, R-3, RA/RA4, RA 100, RA/RT<br />

<strong>Processing</strong> KODAK Motion Picture Films, Module 3, Analytical Procedures H24.03 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!