22.07.2013 Views

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

Processing kodak motion picture films, module 3 analytical procedures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

95 Percent Confidence Estimate (not including bias)<br />

The 95 percent confidence estimate (calculated using the<br />

customer standard deviation) around a single test result will<br />

include the sodium sulfite level 95 percent of the time.<br />

ECN-2 Sample<br />

Fresh 3 g/L Na2SO3 Seasoned Sample<br />

(mean = 1.66 g/L Na2SO3) ECP-2D Sample<br />

Fresh 3 g/L Na2SO3 Seasoned Sample<br />

(mean = 3.35 g/L Na2SO3 )<br />

95 Percent Confidence<br />

Estimate<br />

± 0.090 g/L<br />

± 0.090 g/L<br />

95 Percent Confidence<br />

Estimate<br />

± 0.098 g/L<br />

± 0.260 g/L<br />

Bias<br />

Bias is a statistically significant deviation of the mean from<br />

the known sodium sulfite level at a 95 percent confidence<br />

level. It is determined for fresh samples only. Bias is not<br />

determined for seasoned samples, since the component<br />

concentration level cannot be determined independently of<br />

the test method.<br />

A statistically significant bias was found at all levels for<br />

the Process ECN-2 samples. A low bias of 4.1 percent,<br />

2.4 percent, and 2.9 percent was found at the 1 g/L, 3 g/L,<br />

and 5 g/L levels, respectively. These bias were judged not to<br />

be practically significant.<br />

A low bias of 4.9 percent, 2.5 percent, and 3.6 percent was<br />

found at the 1 g/L, 3 g/L, and 5 g/L levels, respectively for<br />

the Process ECP-2D samples. These bias were judged not to<br />

be statistically or practically significant.<br />

Recovery<br />

Recovery is used instead of bias for seasoned samples, since<br />

the component concentration level cannot be determined<br />

independently of the test method. It is defined as the<br />

calculated mean for the seasoned sample with a standard<br />

addition of the component, divided by the calculated mean<br />

for the seasoned sample plus the actual amount of the<br />

standard addition. It is expressed as a percentage.<br />

The recovery of the standard addition was not statistically<br />

different from 100 percent.<br />

Apparatus<br />

All volumetric glassware should meet all “Class A”<br />

specifications, as defined by American Society for Testing<br />

and Materials (ASTM) Standards E 287, E 288, E 969, and<br />

E 1272 and all referenced documents.<br />

10.0-, 15.0-, and 20.0-mL pipets<br />

250-mL beakers<br />

Automatic titrator with stirrer, METROHM<br />

Potentiograph, Model E536 or equivalent<br />

ORION double-junction reference electrode 900200 or<br />

equivalent (10% KNO 3 outer filling solution)<br />

Platinum inlay electrode, BECKMAN #39373 or<br />

equivalent<br />

Reagents<br />

All chemicals are ACS Reagent Grade unless otherwise<br />

stated.<br />

0.1 N Potassium Iodate, KIO 3 (standardized to 4 places)<br />

0.6 M Potassium Iodide, KI<br />

0.1 N Sodium Thiosulfate, Na2S2O3 (standardized to<br />

4 places)<br />

7 N Sulfuric Acid, H2SO4 Water, Type I Reagent – This method was developed, and<br />

the resulting statistical data were obtained using reagent<br />

water equivalent to purer than Type I Grade, as defined in<br />

ASTM Standard D 1193. Other grades of water, e.g.,<br />

reverse osmosis (RO), demineralized, or distilled water,<br />

may give equivalent results, but the effects of water<br />

quality on method performance have not been studied.<br />

2 <strong>Processing</strong> KODAK Motion Picture Films, Module 3, Analytical Procedures H24.03

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!