22.07.2013 Views

Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 The <strong>Betrayal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Right</strong><br />

Most <strong>of</strong> this loose coalition <strong>of</strong> individualistic radicals was totally<br />

disillusioned with <strong>the</strong> political process, but to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

distinguished between existing parties, <strong>the</strong> Republican Party was<br />

clearly <strong>the</strong> major enemy. Eternal Hamiltonian champions <strong>of</strong> Big<br />

Government and intimate government “partnership” with Big<br />

Business through tariffs, subsidies, and contracts, long-time brandishers<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Imperial big stick, <strong>the</strong> Republicans had capped <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

antilibertarian sins by being <strong>the</strong> party most dedicated to <strong>the</strong><br />

tyranny <strong>of</strong> Prohibition, an evil that particularly enraged H.L.<br />

Mencken. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposition (e.g., Mencken, Villard) supported<br />

<strong>the</strong> short-lived LaFollette Progressive movement <strong>of</strong> 1924,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Progressive Senator William E. Borah (R-Idaho) was an<br />

opposition hero in leading <strong>the</strong> fight against <strong>the</strong> war and <strong>the</strong> League<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nations, and in advocating recognition <strong>of</strong> Soviet Russia. But <strong>the</strong><br />

nearest political home was <strong>the</strong> conservative Bourbon, non-Wilsonian<br />

or “Cleveland” wing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Democratic Party, a wing that at<br />

least tended to be “wet,” was opposed to war and foreign intervention,<br />

and favored free trade and strictly minimal government.<br />

Mencken, <strong>the</strong> most politically minded <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group, felt closest in<br />

politics to Governor Albert Ritchie, <strong>the</strong> states-rights Democrat<br />

from Maryland, and to Senator James Reed, Democrat <strong>of</strong> Missouri,<br />

a man staunchly “isolationist” and anti-intervention in foreign<br />

affairs and pro-laissez-faire at home.<br />

It was this conservative wing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Democratic Party, headed<br />

by Charles Michelson, Jouett Shouse, and John J. Raskob, which<br />

launched a determined attack on Herbert Hoover in <strong>the</strong> late 1920s<br />

for his adherence to Prohibition and to Big Government generally.<br />

It was this wing that would later give rise to <strong>the</strong> much-maligned<br />

Liberty League.<br />

To Mencken and to Nock, in fact, Herbert Hoover—<strong>the</strong> prowar<br />

Wilsonian and interventionist, <strong>the</strong> Food Czar <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war, <strong>the</strong><br />

champion <strong>of</strong> Big Government, <strong>of</strong> high tariffs and business cartels,<br />

<strong>the</strong> pious moralist and apologist for Prohibition—embodied everything<br />

<strong>the</strong>y abhorred in <strong>American</strong> political life. They were clearly<br />

leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individualist opposition to Hoover’s conservative statism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!