Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12 The <strong>Betrayal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Right</strong><br />
Most <strong>of</strong> this loose coalition <strong>of</strong> individualistic radicals was totally<br />
disillusioned with <strong>the</strong> political process, but to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
distinguished between existing parties, <strong>the</strong> Republican Party was<br />
clearly <strong>the</strong> major enemy. Eternal Hamiltonian champions <strong>of</strong> Big<br />
Government and intimate government “partnership” with Big<br />
Business through tariffs, subsidies, and contracts, long-time brandishers<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Imperial big stick, <strong>the</strong> Republicans had capped <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
antilibertarian sins by being <strong>the</strong> party most dedicated to <strong>the</strong><br />
tyranny <strong>of</strong> Prohibition, an evil that particularly enraged H.L.<br />
Mencken. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposition (e.g., Mencken, Villard) supported<br />
<strong>the</strong> short-lived LaFollette Progressive movement <strong>of</strong> 1924,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Progressive Senator William E. Borah (R-Idaho) was an<br />
opposition hero in leading <strong>the</strong> fight against <strong>the</strong> war and <strong>the</strong> League<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nations, and in advocating recognition <strong>of</strong> Soviet Russia. But <strong>the</strong><br />
nearest political home was <strong>the</strong> conservative Bourbon, non-Wilsonian<br />
or “Cleveland” wing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Democratic Party, a wing that at<br />
least tended to be “wet,” was opposed to war and foreign intervention,<br />
and favored free trade and strictly minimal government.<br />
Mencken, <strong>the</strong> most politically minded <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group, felt closest in<br />
politics to Governor Albert Ritchie, <strong>the</strong> states-rights Democrat<br />
from Maryland, and to Senator James Reed, Democrat <strong>of</strong> Missouri,<br />
a man staunchly “isolationist” and anti-intervention in foreign<br />
affairs and pro-laissez-faire at home.<br />
It was this conservative wing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Democratic Party, headed<br />
by Charles Michelson, Jouett Shouse, and John J. Raskob, which<br />
launched a determined attack on Herbert Hoover in <strong>the</strong> late 1920s<br />
for his adherence to Prohibition and to Big Government generally.<br />
It was this wing that would later give rise to <strong>the</strong> much-maligned<br />
Liberty League.<br />
To Mencken and to Nock, in fact, Herbert Hoover—<strong>the</strong> prowar<br />
Wilsonian and interventionist, <strong>the</strong> Food Czar <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war, <strong>the</strong><br />
champion <strong>of</strong> Big Government, <strong>of</strong> high tariffs and business cartels,<br />
<strong>the</strong> pious moralist and apologist for Prohibition—embodied everything<br />
<strong>the</strong>y abhorred in <strong>American</strong> political life. They were clearly<br />
leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individualist opposition to Hoover’s conservative statism.