Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Betrayal of the American Right - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10 The <strong>Betrayal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Right</strong><br />
and Barnes’s student, C. Hartley Grattan, whose delightful series<br />
in <strong>the</strong> magazine, “When Historians Cut Loose,” acidly demolished<br />
<strong>the</strong> war propaganda <strong>of</strong> America’s leading historians. Mencken’s<br />
cultural scorn for <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> “booboisie” was embodied in his<br />
famous “<strong>American</strong>a” column, which simply reprinted news items<br />
on <strong>the</strong> idiocies <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> life without editorial comment.<br />
The enormous scope <strong>of</strong> Mencken’s interests, coupled with his<br />
scintillating wit and style (Mencken was labeled by Joseph Wood<br />
Krutch as “<strong>the</strong> greatest prose stylist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century”),<br />
served to obscure for his generation <strong>of</strong> youthful followers and<br />
admirers <strong>the</strong> remarkable consistency <strong>of</strong> his thought. When,<br />
decades after his former prominence, Mencken collected <strong>the</strong> best<br />
<strong>of</strong> his old writings in A Mencken Chrestomathy (1948), <strong>the</strong> book was<br />
reviewed in <strong>the</strong> New Leader by <strong>the</strong> eminent literary critic Samuel<br />
Putnam. Putnam reacted in considerable surprise; remembering<br />
Mencken from his youth as merely a glib cynic, Putnam found to<br />
his admiring astonishment that H.L.M. had always been a “Tory<br />
anarchist”—an apt summation for <strong>the</strong> intellectual leader <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
1920s.<br />
But H.L. Mencken was not <strong>the</strong> only editor leading <strong>the</strong> new<br />
upsurge <strong>of</strong> individualistic opposition during <strong>the</strong> 1920s. From a<br />
similar though more moderate stance, <strong>the</strong> Nation <strong>of</strong> Mencken’s<br />
friend Oswald Garrison Villard continued to serve as an outstanding<br />
voice for peace, revisionism on World War I, and opposition to<br />
<strong>the</strong> imperialist status quo imposed at Versailles. Villard, at <strong>the</strong> end<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war, acknowledged that <strong>the</strong> war had pushed him far to <strong>the</strong><br />
left, not in <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> adopting socialism, but in being thoroughly<br />
“against <strong>the</strong> present political order.” Denounced by conservatives<br />
as pacifist, pro-German, and “Bolshevist,” Villard found himself<br />
forced into a political and journalistic alliance with socialists and<br />
progressives who shared his hostility to <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>American</strong> and<br />
world order. 1<br />
1 Villard to Hutchins Hapgood, May 19, 1919. Michael Wreszin,<br />
Oswald Garrison Villard (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965),<br />
pp. 75 and 125–30.