22.07.2013 Views

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220 <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Man</strong>, <strong>Economy</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Market</strong><br />

Even government officials do not truly own resources at <strong>State</strong><br />

disposal, because they enjoy only temporary control. In contrast<br />

<strong>to</strong> popular belief, politicians are inherently shortsighted <strong>and</strong><br />

tend <strong>to</strong> use resources <strong>to</strong>o quickly. Private owners, on the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, can always sell their property for its capitalized value, <strong>and</strong><br />

thus will exploit it at the optimal rate.<br />

Democracy refers <strong>to</strong> majority rule, but in the “classical” sense<br />

it means majority decision on policies, whereas in the “modern”<br />

sense it usually means majority decision on rulers (“representatives”)<br />

who then decide on actual policies.<br />

The principle of democracy is riddled <strong>with</strong> contradictions.<br />

Can the people vote <strong>to</strong> end a democracy (either by moving <strong>to</strong><br />

dicta<strong>to</strong>rship or ushering in a <strong>to</strong>tally free market)? “Democratic<br />

socialism” is infeasible, because the government ultimately<br />

decides on how many resources go <strong>to</strong> various propag<strong>and</strong>a<br />

efforts, <strong>and</strong> can determine the occupations of the opposition<br />

leaders.<br />

There is also the more fundamental question: Why is<br />

democracy supposed <strong>to</strong> be so good? There are countless his<strong>to</strong>rical<br />

examples of the public making ignorant <strong>and</strong> evil decisions.<br />

It is also far from obvious that democracy is an effective means<br />

<strong>to</strong> check the growth of <strong>State</strong> power.<br />

Simon Kuznets originally measured the size of government<br />

production by taxes paid, operating on the analogy <strong>with</strong> consumer<br />

expenditures for a private good or service. The problem<br />

is that taxpayers do not voluntarily give their funds for such<br />

“services.” The Department of Commerce instead calculates on<br />

the basis of the <strong>to</strong>tal “cost” of a given program, <strong>and</strong> hence the<br />

bigger the government deficit, the more it is “serving” the community.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!