22.07.2013 Views

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Man</strong>, <strong>Economy</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Market</strong><br />

C. Shifting <strong>and</strong> Incidence: A Tax on an Industry<br />

It is a myth (in both mainstream economics <strong>and</strong> the<br />

public at large) that taxes on a firm can be “passed on” <strong>to</strong><br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers. If firms could really do this—i.e., raise prices<br />

<strong>to</strong> generate extra revenues <strong>to</strong> offset a new tax—then why<br />

didn’t the firms do it before? It is true that a tax will eventually<br />

raise prices paid by consumers, but this is achieved<br />

by lowering profitability <strong>and</strong> hence supply, which then<br />

raises the equilibrium price.<br />

D. Shifting <strong>and</strong> Incidence: A General Sales Tax<br />

Even in the “obvious” case of a general sales tax, it is<br />

simply not true that businesses can pass on price hikes <strong>to</strong><br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers. What happens instead is that the tax is shifted<br />

backward <strong>to</strong> the imputed DMVPs of the fac<strong>to</strong>rs of production.<br />

Thus a firm reacts <strong>to</strong> a new tax not by raising its<br />

prices <strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers, but by lowering its payments <strong>to</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

owners.<br />

E. A Tax on L<strong>and</strong> Values<br />

<strong>Man</strong>y analysts think that taxes on l<strong>and</strong> do not dis<strong>to</strong>rt,<br />

since (unlike other resources) l<strong>and</strong> cannot shift out of a<br />

taxed industry. This is not true, because l<strong>and</strong> owners provide<br />

a definite service by discovering <strong>and</strong> allocating l<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>to</strong> the highest bidders. If the government imposed a 100<br />

percent tax on ground rents, it is true that the real estate<br />

would not physically disappear. But the affected owners<br />

would certainly s<strong>to</strong>p advertising the parcels in the hopes<br />

of finding higher bidders, <strong>and</strong> no one would try <strong>to</strong> find<br />

new plots of l<strong>and</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!