22.07.2013 Views

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

Study Guide to Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Man</strong>, <strong>Economy</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Market</strong><br />

Notable Contributions<br />

• To underscore the fallacy of referring <strong>to</strong> a general “rate<br />

of profit,” Rothbard invents the concept of a general “rate<br />

of loss” (p. 513). His point is that it is not normal or au<strong>to</strong>matic<br />

<strong>to</strong> earn profits on the market. The st<strong>and</strong>ard excess<br />

of product prices over money expenditures on fac<strong>to</strong>rs is<br />

due <strong>to</strong> interest, not entrepreneurship.<br />

• The “paradox of saving” is this: In order <strong>to</strong> accumulate<br />

capital goods <strong>and</strong> produce a greater volume of output<br />

goods, it is necessary <strong>to</strong> curtail present consumption. But<br />

if retailers see a drop in the dem<strong>and</strong> for their products,<br />

why would they invest in greater production capabilities<br />

for the future? Only <strong>with</strong> a capital theory (such as the<br />

Austrian) that incorporates the role of time in production<br />

can one resolve this apparent paradox. As Böhm-Bawerk<br />

pointed out in response <strong>to</strong> a nineteenth-century proponent<br />

of this Keynesian view, when people save they are not<br />

“spending less on consumption,” but rather they are<br />

spending less on present consumption in the hopes of<br />

spending more on future consumption.<br />

• Rothbard defines the progressing <strong>and</strong> retrogressing<br />

economy in terms of <strong>to</strong>tal gross investment, while Mises<br />

defined these in terms of per capita <strong>to</strong>tal investment. (See<br />

footnote 16, p. 532.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!