21.07.2013 Views

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290<br />

(110) Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences for which no arrest shall be made,<br />

which has been discussed in the Section dealing with “ Investigation”.<br />

(111) Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences where arrest can be made only with<br />

the order <strong>of</strong> the court and reducing the number <strong>of</strong> cases where arrest can<br />

be made without an order or warrant from the Magistrate, which has<br />

been discussed in the Section dealing with “Investigation”.<br />

(112) Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences which are bailable and reducing the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences which are not bailable discussed in the Section<br />

dealing with “Police Investigation”.<br />

(113) Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences that can be brought within the<br />

category <strong>of</strong> compoundable / settlement category discussed in Section<br />

dealing with “Sentences and Sentencing”.<br />

(114) The Committee recommends a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

Penal Code, the Evidence Act and the Criminal Procedure Code by a<br />

broad based Committee representing the functionaries <strong>of</strong> the Criminal<br />

<strong>Justice</strong> System, eminent men and women representing different schools<br />

<strong>of</strong> thoughts, social scientists and vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> the society and<br />

to make recommendations to the Parliament for stronger and<br />

progressive loss for the Country.<br />

16. OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN<br />

There are several shortcomings or aberrations in dealing with the <strong>of</strong>fences<br />

against women which need to be addressed. The Committee feels that a man<br />

who marries a second wife during the subsistence <strong>of</strong> the first wife should not<br />

escape his liability to maintain his second wife under Section 125 <strong>of</strong> the Code<br />

on the grounds that the second marriage is neither lawful nor valid.<br />

The Supreme Court has held that, for proving bigamy, it is to be<br />

established that the second marriage was performed in accordance with the<br />

customary rites <strong>of</strong> either parties under the personal laws which is not easy to<br />

prove. Therefore the Committee feels that evidence regarding a man and<br />

woman living together for a reasonably long period should be sufficient to draw<br />

the presumption that the marriage was performed according to the customary<br />

rites <strong>of</strong> the parties.<br />

As a man can be punished under Section 497 <strong>of</strong> IPC for adultery, for<br />

having sexual intercourse with a wife <strong>of</strong> another man it stands to reason that<br />

wife should likewise be punished if she has sexual intercourse with another<br />

married man.<br />

There is a general complaint that section 498A <strong>of</strong> the IPC regarding cruelty<br />

by the husband or his relatives is subjected to gross misuse and many times

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!