21.07.2013 Views

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

287<br />

on priority basis. The arrears <strong>of</strong> cases triable under Section 262 and<br />

under Section 206 shall be disposed <strong>of</strong> expeditiously.<br />

(95) The Courts constituted under the Arrears Eradication Scheme shall<br />

dispose <strong>of</strong> the cases expeditiously.<br />

(96) A case taken up for hearing should be heard on a day to day basis until<br />

conclusion. Only such number <strong>of</strong> cases as can be conveniently disposed<br />

<strong>of</strong> shall be posted for hearing every day as far as possible in consultation<br />

with the concerned lawyers.<br />

(97) Once the case is posted for hearing it shall not be adjourned. If under<br />

special circumstances a case is required to be adjourned, it should be<br />

done for reasons to be recorded in writing subject to payment <strong>of</strong> costs and<br />

also the amount <strong>of</strong> expenses <strong>of</strong> the witnesses. The court in its discretion<br />

shall award costs to the other party or direct that the same shall be<br />

credited to the victim compensation fund if one is constituted.<br />

(98) The (retired) Judge incharge <strong>of</strong> the Arrears Eradication scheme shall<br />

make an estimate <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> additional courts required to be<br />

constituted for eradication <strong>of</strong> the arrears at each place including the<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> staff, number <strong>of</strong> Public Prosecutors and other<br />

infrastructure required and move the concerned authorities to appoint<br />

them.<br />

(99) The High Court shall take effective measures to ensure that the current<br />

cases are disposed <strong>of</strong> expeditiously and that no current cases would be<br />

pending for more than two years. Additional Courts if needed for this<br />

purpose should be sanctioned expeditiously.<br />

14. OFFENCES, SENTENCES, SENTENCING & COMPOUNDING<br />

Since the IPC was enacted in the year 1860, many developments have taken<br />

place, new forms <strong>of</strong> crimes have come into existence, punishments for some<br />

crimes are proving grossly inadequate and the need for imposing only fine as a<br />

sentence for smaller <strong>of</strong>fences is felt. Variety <strong>of</strong> the punishments prescribed is<br />

limited. Thus there is need to have new forms <strong>of</strong> punishments such as<br />

community service, disqualification from holding public <strong>of</strong>fices, confiscation<br />

orders, imprisonment for life without commutation or remission etc. Hence the<br />

Committee is in favour to review the IPC.<br />

The IPC prescribes only the maximum punishments for the <strong>of</strong>fences and in some<br />

cases minimum punishment is also prescribed. The Judge exercises wide discretion within

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!