21.07.2013 Views

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath Report First pages - Ministry of Home Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

185<br />

minor <strong>of</strong>fence get labeled as criminals and this stigma makes it difficult for<br />

them to get jobs and even a chance to reform and become useful members <strong>of</strong><br />

Society. Where such persons are sent to jail, they <strong>of</strong>ten come under the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> hardened criminals and gravitate towards a life <strong>of</strong> crime. This is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for suggesting fine and not imprisonment as the only<br />

punishment in respect <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> minor <strong>of</strong>fences. This logic equally<br />

applies to increasing the number <strong>of</strong> compoundable <strong>of</strong>fences which while<br />

satisfying the victim do not affect societal interests.<br />

15.6.9 Relevant factors are the following: -<br />

?? Nature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence;<br />

?? Degree <strong>of</strong> violence;<br />

?? Extent <strong>of</strong> injury to the victim<br />

?? Extent <strong>of</strong> damage to property;<br />

?? Impact on the society;<br />

?? Any discernible behaviour pattern in commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence;<br />

?? Whether alternative methods <strong>of</strong> dispute resolution like<br />

compounding or settlement would be adequate.<br />

?? Whether the victim should be compensated monetarily;<br />

?? The punishment prescribed by law for the <strong>of</strong>fence and whether<br />

that is appropriate to the act.<br />

15.6.10 Taking into consideration the above factors, it should be decided<br />

whether for each <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fences the accused should be inflicted punishment <strong>of</strong><br />

fine or imprisonment, whether the accused should be arrested or not, whether<br />

the arrest should be with or without the order <strong>of</strong> the court, or whether the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence should be bailable or not and whether the <strong>of</strong>fence should be<br />

compoundable or not and if compoundable, whether with or without the order <strong>of</strong><br />

the court.<br />

15.6.11 As is done in some countries it may be considered to classify the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences into three Codes namely (1) The Social Welfare Offence Code (2) The<br />

Correctional Offence Code, (3) The Criminal Offences Code and (4) The<br />

Economic and other Offences Code.<br />

15.6.12 A Social welfare <strong>of</strong>fences Code would include <strong>of</strong>fences that are<br />

social in origin or nature and cover <strong>of</strong>fences that might be prevented through<br />

awareness programmes. For such <strong>of</strong>fences community service is preferred to<br />

jail sentence.<br />

15.6.13 The Correctional <strong>of</strong>fences Code would include non-cognizable<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences that are punishable with less than 6 months imprisonment, which need<br />

not be considered as crimes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!