21.07.2013 Views

Pre-Operative Cardiopulmonary Assessment: 2013 - University of ...

Pre-Operative Cardiopulmonary Assessment: 2013 - University of ...

Pre-Operative Cardiopulmonary Assessment: 2013 - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pre</strong>-<strong>Operative</strong><br />

<strong>Cardiopulmonary</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>:<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Russell Vinik, M.D.<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Utah School <strong>of</strong> Medicine


Case<br />

!! 71 year old man presents for pre-operative<br />

evaluation for Hip Arthroplasty.<br />

!! He is severely limited by his symptoms and wants to<br />

get the hip fixed ASAP<br />

!! PMH: DM, Htn, CKD (creatinine 1.5)<br />

!! No previous MI<br />

!! Meds: glargine, metformin, lisinopril<br />

!! Never had a stress test.<br />

!! Echo 2 years ago was “normal”<br />

!! Ambulation is limited by pain in his hip.


Questions<br />

1.! What is this patients risk <strong>of</strong> having a<br />

peri-operative cardiac event?<br />

!! Will additional tests help to predict his risk?<br />

2.! Should we order a stress test?<br />

!! If positive, should we revascularize?<br />

3.! Other than revascularization, what other<br />

strategies might reduce his risk?<br />

!! Beta-blockers, Statins


Clinical Risk Stratification


Risk Factors: Revised Cardiac Risk<br />

Index (Lee Index)<br />

!! Developed in 4,315 patients age 50 or over<br />

!! Subsequently validated in cohort <strong>of</strong> 108, 593 patients<br />

!! 6 Risk factors<br />

!! High-risk Surgery*<br />

!! Ischemic Heart Disease<br />

!! History <strong>of</strong> CHF<br />

!! History <strong>of</strong> Cerebrovascular disease<br />

!! Insulin therapy for Diabetes<br />

!! <strong>Pre</strong>operative Creatinine >2.0 mg/dl<br />

!! 0 Factor Event rate= .4%<br />

!! 1 Factors = .9%<br />

!! 2 Factors = 7%<br />

!! 3 or more = 11%<br />

*High risk=intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, suprainguinal vascular<br />

Circulation. 1999;100:1043-1049 Am J Med2005;118:1134-41


ACC/AHA Perioperative Guidelines<br />

Active Cardiac Conditions


Clinical risk factors: CAD, CHF, DM, CVA/TIA, renal insufficiency<br />

ACC/AHA<br />

Algorithm<br />

Circulation 2007;116:e418-e499


- Used fictitious data<br />

- Submitted knowingly unreliable data<br />

- Inconsistency between source documents and case report forms<br />

- Source documentation missing<br />

- Adverse Events Committee did not exist<br />

JACC- “ We have elected not to retract these manuscripts. However, given<br />

the uncertainty regarding the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the data, readers should be<br />

cautioned in the application <strong>of</strong> the findings <strong>of</strong> these manuscripts to<br />

clinical practice.”<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(25):2696-2697. Forbes Pharma & Healthcare 11/17/2011


Poldermans Articles<br />

!! Decrease- Bisoprolol reduced cardiac death/MI 3.4% vs. 34%<br />

NEJM 1999<br />

!! Decrease II- No benefit for cardiac testing in intermediate risk<br />

patients undergoing vascular surgery if beta blockers are given JACC<br />

06<br />

!! Decrease III – 497 patients- Fluvastatin reduced cardiac death/MI<br />

by 50% in vascular surgery patients NEJM 09<br />

!! Decrease IV- 1066 patient 2x2 study- bisoprolol assoc with 30 day<br />

reduction in cardiac death MI with trend for reduction with<br />

fluvastatin Ann Surg 09<br />

!! Decrease V- No benefit for prophylactic revascularization in<br />

patients with extensive ischemia if given B blockers JACC 07<br />

!! ESC Guidelines- Beta blockers and statins in high risk surgery<br />

(Class I) EurheartJ 09


Lets Start Over<br />

Can we better predict our<br />

patients risk <strong>of</strong> cardiac events


<strong>Pre</strong>-Op BNP helps to predict<br />

Cardiac Events in Vascular Surgery<br />

BNP Major Cardiac Event (%) OR<br />

372 36.7% 45<br />

•!Patients were re-classified using the Revised Cardiac Risk index<br />

•!NP < 116 moved down 1 risk group<br />

•!NP >116 moved up 1 risk group<br />

RCRI Risk MACE Total<br />

Low Risk (0) 5.9% 320<br />

Int Risk (1-2) 9.5% 476<br />

High Risk (3+) 20% 54<br />

Re-Classified MACE Total<br />

Low 3.7% 596<br />

Int 15.1% 93<br />

High 24% 161<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:522-9


Non Invasive Testing:<br />

Dypyridamole-thallium<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:787-98


Non Invasive Testing: Stress Echo<br />

!! Meta analysis <strong>of</strong> 68 studies with 10,049<br />

patients showed better negative predictive<br />

ability for stress echo compared to thallium<br />

imaging<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:787-9 Anesth Analg 2006;102:8-6


Management Strategies for High<br />

Risk Patients


<strong>Pre</strong>-Op Revascularization<br />

!! Reviewed 1600 patients in CASS registry who<br />

underwent non-cardiac operations<br />

!! Group 1 – no angiographic evidence <strong>of</strong> CAD<br />

!! Group 2 – CAD but prior CABG<br />

!! Group 3 – significant angiographic CAD (70%<br />

stenosis) but no prior bypass surgery.<br />

!! <strong>Operative</strong> mortality rates:<br />

!! Group 1 -No CAD= 0.5%<br />

!! Group 2- Prior CABG= 0.9%<br />

!! Group 3 = CAD without CABG=2.4%<br />

Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41:42-50


CARP Trial<br />

!! Prospective Randomized trial<br />

!! Indication was AAA or arterial occlusive<br />

disease <strong>of</strong> the legs<br />

!! 510 patients randomized to revascularization<br />

vs no-revascularization<br />

!! All patients had at least 70% stenosis on cath<br />

!! Excluded Left Main dz, Severe AS, EF


CARP Trial Results<br />

!! Median Time from Randomization to surgery - 54 days in<br />

revascularization group vs. 18 days no revascularization<br />

!! Post-Op MI occurred in 12% in revascularization group<br />

vs. 14% (p=.37)<br />

!! Mortality at 2.7 years was 23% in the revascularization<br />

group vs. 22% (p=.92)<br />

!! Subsequent analysis:<br />

!! Nonfatal MI occurred in 16.8% <strong>of</strong> patients who had PCI vs.<br />

6.6% (p=.024) in CABG patients<br />

!! Differences in mortality remained insignificant 3.8% vs. 2.2%<br />

(p=.497)<br />

NEJM 2004; 351:2794-804 Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:795-800


<strong>Pre</strong>-Op Revascularization: PCI<br />

!! 40 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery within 6-weeks <strong>of</strong> stent placement<br />

!! 20% mortality, 18% risk non-fatal MI, 28% major bleeding risk<br />

!! 216 patients who underwent surgery within 3 months <strong>of</strong> cardiac intervention<br />

!! 13 <strong>of</strong> 94 (14%) <strong>of</strong> patients who had been treated with stent died<br />

!! 13 <strong>of</strong> 122 (11%) <strong>of</strong> patients who had PTCA without stent died<br />

!! 899 patients who underwent non-cardiac procedure after bare metal stent- rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> major cardiac events:<br />

!! 10.5% if procedure


Anti-Platelet Therapy<br />

Fleisher, L. A. et al. Circulation 2007;116:e418-e499


Beta Blockers<br />

The controversy got even bigger


Perioperative !-blockers: Atenolol<br />

!! Randomized 200 patients undergoing non-cardiac<br />

surgery to Atenolol vs. Placebo<br />

!! Patients had either CAD or 2 or more risk factors*<br />

!! Absolute mortality:<br />

!! 0% vs 8%, (p < 0.001) at 6 months<br />

!! 10% vs. 21%, (p = 0.019) at 2 years<br />

!! Excluded in-hospital deaths<br />

!! Mortality reduction became insignificant after inclusion <strong>of</strong> inhospital<br />

deaths<br />

!! 8% <strong>of</strong> control group was previously on beta blockers<br />

and these were stopped possibly precipitating<br />

withdrawal during the peri-operative period<br />

*Risk factors: Age>65, Diabetes, Htn,<br />

Smoking, Total Cholesterol >240mg/dl NEJM 1996;335:17 17-20.


Placebo-Controlled Metoprolol<br />

Trials<br />

!! DIPOM- 921 Diabetics undergoing major surgery<br />

!! No benefit for metoprolol after 18 months<br />

!! initiated within 24 hours before surgery<br />

!! MAVS- 496 Patients undergoing vascular surgery<br />

!! No difference in 30 day events<br />

!! initiated within 2 hours <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />

!! POBBLE- 103 patients with previous MI having<br />

vascular surgery<br />

!! No difference in 30 day events<br />

!! initiated the day before surgery<br />

BMJ. 2006 Jun 24;332(7556):1482<br />

Am Heart J 2006 November;152:983-90, J Vasc Surg 2005;41:602-9


POISE Trial<br />

!! Double Blind- Randomized trial <strong>of</strong> 8351 patients<br />

!! Included:<br />

!! High risk group: Over 80% <strong>of</strong> patients had either a history <strong>of</strong> CAD,<br />

Peripheral Vascular Disease, or Stroke<br />

!! Excluded patients already on a beta blocker<br />

!! Procedure: patients given either extended release<br />

metoprolol or placebo<br />

!! 100mg pre-op<br />

!! 100mg 6 hour post op<br />

!! 200mg 12 hrs later and then 200mg daily for 30 days<br />

!! Patients unable to take po were given metoprolol 15mg IV every 6 hours<br />

!! Drug held if BP below 100mg Hg or HR


POISE Results<br />

Outcome Metoprolol<br />

n=4174<br />

Placebo<br />

n=4177<br />

Nonfatal MI 152 (3.6) 215 (5.1) .04<br />

A-fib 91 (2.2) 120 (2.9) .04<br />

Significant Hypotension 626 (15.0) 404 (9.7)


Author<br />

(Year)<br />

Statins in the Peri-operative Setting:<br />

Meta Analysis Results<br />

Population Included Findings<br />

Tabata (2009) Cardiovascular Surgery Mortality Benefit:<br />

OR 0.67 (0.54-0.83)<br />

Winchester<br />

(2010)<br />

Non cardiac surgery &<br />

PCI<br />

MI Reduction:<br />

RR 0.57 (0.46-0.7)<br />

All Cause Mortality:<br />

RR 0.66 (0.37-1.17)<br />

Tabata M et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136:1510 & Winchester DE. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:000


Statins: A word <strong>of</strong> Caution<br />

!! Several studies <strong>of</strong> patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes have<br />

shown:<br />

!! 2-3 fold increase in cardiac events in patients in whom statin was<br />

acutely withdrawn during the hospitalization<br />

!! These patients had a higher cardiac event rate than those who were<br />

never started on a statin<br />

!! There are no intravenous formulations <strong>of</strong> statins<br />

!! What happens when the patient is NPO after surgery?<br />

!! Retrospective cohort <strong>of</strong> 298 statin users undergoing major vascular<br />

surgery:<br />

!! Post-Op statin discontinuation associated with:<br />

!! Hazard ratio 7.5 for cardiovascular death or MI<br />

!! 50-75% fewer events in patients taking extended release fluvastatin<br />

compared to other statins<br />

!! 200 consecutive patients after CABG- Post-op a-fib developed:<br />

!! 18% <strong>of</strong> patients who were re-initiated on statin within 48 hours after<br />

surgery vs. 28% <strong>of</strong> patients who were not.<br />

Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2162-8 Circ 2002;105:1446-52 Am J Cardiol 2007;100:316-20<br />

Am J Cardiol 2011;108:220-222


Conclusions<br />

! Risk stratification has good negative predictive<br />

value<br />

!! PCI as a bridge to surgery likely does more<br />

harm than good<br />

!! Consider stress testing if you would consider<br />

CABG prior to elective surgery<br />

!! Statins- likely good but keep them going<br />

!! Beta blockers<br />

!! Don’t stop them if the patient is already taking<br />

!! Should you start them?????<br />

!! If you do, start gently and give time to titrate.


Thank You.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!