A Proposal to Reduce Unnecessary Divorce - Razorplanet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

24 Table 2 State Waiting Periods for No-Fault Divorce state alabama alaska arizona arkansas california colorado connecticut delaware district of columbia florida georgia hawaii idaho illinois indiana iowa kansas kentucky louisiana maine maryland massachusetts michigan minnesota mississippi missouri montana nebraska waiting periods 30 days none 60 days 18 months 6 months 90 days breakdown OR 18 months before filing; then 90 days post-filing 6 months 1 year (contested); 6 months (uncontested) 20 days 30 days none none 2 years (contested); 6 months (uncontested) none 90 days 60 days 60 days (uncontested) 1 year with children; 6 months without none 1 year 9 months; 3 months with consent none none 60 days with consent; never without 2 years without consent; 1 year if separation consensual; none if divorce uncontested none 60 days
state nevada new hampshire new jersey new mexico new york north carolina north dakota ohio oklahoma oregon pennsylvania rhode island south carolina south dakota tennessee texas utah vermont virginia washington west virginia wisconsin wyoming waiting periods none none 6 months none 6 months 1 year none 1 year without consent; none with none 90 days 2 years without consent; 90 days with none 1 year 60 days with consent; never without 2 years without minor children; truly irreconcilable differences with; plus post-filing period of 60 days without minor children; 90 days with 60 days (unless domestic violence order or conviction) 90 days OR completing divorce education course for parents 6 months 1 year with minor children; 6 months without children and with written separation agreement 90 days 1 year without consent; none with 1 year before filing OR consent OR court finding of breakdown; plus 6 months post-filing 20 days Prepared by John Crouch, Arlington, Virginia, www.crouchfamilylaw.com. Based on a 2011 review of all state divorce statutes by John Crouch and his students, Michael Cardi of West Virginia University School of Law and Courtney Hawkins of Tulane University, and William J. Doherty, University of Minnesota, and his student research assistant, Jennifer Sampson. 25
Page 1: Sec nd Chances A Proposal to Reduce
Page 4 and 5: THE AUTHORS ARE GRATEFUL TO Charles
Page 6 and 7: 6 October 21, 2011 DEAR READER: As
Page 8 and 9: 8 MAJOR FINDINGS n About 40 percent
Page 10 and 11: 10 1. RESEARCH 1. RESEARCH FINDINGS
Page 12 and 13: 12 In a compelling use of data, Pro
Page 14 and 15: 14 These costs arise from increased
Page 16 and 17: 16 be interested in an “exit ramp
Page 18 and 19: 18 Table 1 Minnesota Couples on the
Page 20 and 21: 20 2. RECOMMENDATIONS The remaining
Page 22 and 23: 22 In her classic qualitative study
Page 26 and 27: 26 5. States and nations with waiti
Page 28 and 29: 28 years but has remained in the ma
Page 30 and 31: 30 clergy, pastoral counselors asso
Page 32 and 33: 32 MARSHA: “What do you mean, tru
Page 34 and 35: 34 communication and conflict manag
Page 36 and 37: 36 had Internet access. 49 In addit
Page 38 and 39: 38 Marriage education programs have
Page 40 and 41: 40 n Innovating and offering “dis
Page 42 and 43: 42 3. MODEL LEGISLATION FOR THE SEC
Page 44 and 45: 44 A BILL ESTABLISHING A CENTER TO
Page 46 and 47: 46 o I am experiencing an emergency
Page 48 and 49: 48 education program is responsible
Page 50 and 51: 50 justice leah Ward Sears was the
Page 52 and 53: 52 divorce was determined by multip
Page 54 and 55: 54 24. Frank F. Furstenberg, Jr., a
Page 56 and 57: 56 42. Susan L. Pollet and Melissa
Page 58: 58 61. More on “hopeful spouse co

A Proposal to Reduce Unnecessary Divorce - Razorplanet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?