History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

services vastly improved the singing. Wesley was delighted. William Bramwell, Richard Reece, Joseph Entwistle, and Pearl Dickinson are names now appearing, and immortal in Methodism. All his preachers were now licensed to save them from the Conventicle Act; but it widened a breach with the National Church and made ultimate separation inevitable. Wesley had ceased to publish except in the Arminian Magazine. Dr. Coke, and principally, Mr. Bradford were now his traveling companions. Everywhere he was received with worshipful respect. His flowing snow-white hair, his ruddy countenance, his searching eyes, which had lost none of their brightness, made him an angel visitant. The forty-fifth Conference was held in London, July 29, 1788. The prosperity was unabated. Among those received at this conference was John Hickling, who survived till 1859, aged ninety-three, the last of Wesley's "Helpers." He had preached more than seventy years, and at the time of his death was announced for six special occasions. Wesley had passed his eighty-fifth birthday with unusual incidents, and the year was marked with many events of a striking character, which may be found in Tyerman's "Life," but cannot be reproduced under limit of space. March 29 of this year Charles Wesley died. Wesley was at Macclesfield and could not get to London in time for the funeral. Charles had left instructions to be buried in "consecrated ground" and by clergymen of the National Church. Wesley was much grieved, for he wished him to be buried near him in City Road chapel ground. He intended to write his brother's Life, but he could not find the time. Dr. Whitehead, by special request of the family, performed acceptably and successfully the task, having access to his Journal and all his private papers. On Christmas day of this year Wesley preached at City Road chapel, and on the last Sunday in the year at All Hallows church. His attendant while putting on his gown was addressed by Wesley. "Sir, it is above fifty years since I first preached in this church . . . I came without a sermon. A woman who stood by noticing my concern said, on learning the cause of my confusion, 'Cannot you trust God for a sermon?'" It had such an effect on him that he ascended the pulpit and preached extempore . . . "I have never since taken a written sermon with me into the pulpit." 1789, and Wesley at eighty-six. In January he sat for a picture by Romney, and he compliments him, "He struck off an exact likeness at once and did more in an hour than Sir Joshua did in ten." His sight and other faculties showed signs of decay, but in March he started on a five months' preaching tour over the kingdom. At Dublin chapel he called on William Myles, his assistant at this place, to aid him in administering the Lord's Supper, and he was not yet ordained. It gave great offense, and a controversy raged for three months over it in the Daily Dublin Evening Post. It was pronounced "the greatest innovation that had been witnessed for fifty years." His reason for this step can be conjectured only. Under Dr. Coke's management the Dublin Methodists had service during the Church hours, to keep them from wandering from their own service at other hours, a practice Coke determined must be stopped. It led to farther controversy, and Wesley endeavored to justify Coke, though it was a thing he so often condemned. Notwithstanding these divarications of his own he stickled and insisted that other rules should be obeyed to the letter. At Dewsbury the year before his book steward, Atlay, led a rebellion against his power to appoint exclusively the preacher. Atlay and the chapel were both lost to the connection. Now at Shields the same disaffection appeared. Wesley wrote a peremptory letter to the three circuit preachers, that they demand a settlement of the deed on the Conference plan within three weeks, and if within another week it was not complied with they were to withdraw and not preach in it. In a postscript he says: "I am at a point. I will be trifled with

no longer." He was seriously sick during this period — diabetes threatened, but under treatment from his faithful and confidential physician, Dr. Whitehead, it abated, though he suffered more or less with it to his decease. His buoyant spirits at this time were remarked by many. He held his Irish Conference, now numbering some sixty, of whom forty or more were present. He compliments them in the strongest terms, and they have never ceased to be worthy of it. On the Conference Sunday Wesley and his preachers attended service at St. Patrick's, and heard the dean preach, "a serious, useful sermon." The Irish preachers were to a man true to the Church. On the 12th of July he bid adieu to Ireland forever. The scene of parting was most affecting. — "Not a few fell on the old man's neck and kissed him." About this time in a private letter occurs the sentence, "Dr. Coke made two [12] or three little alterations in the prayer-book without my knowledge." It is quoted as a pointer for future use. On the 28th of July, 1789, the forty-sixth session of Conference began in Leeds. Two hundred and eighty-eight preachers received appointments. The societies continued to grow. Circuits and missions, 109, not including Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, and the numbers in society 74,254. What may be called the Conference sermon was preached by a local preacher, James Hamilton, M.D., perhaps the only instance of the kind in English Methodism. It was an able discourse, met with Wesley's approbation, was printed and widely circulated. About 130 preachers were present, according to Atmore, and of these 115 signed a paper favoring the settlement of the chapels according to the Conference plan, and among them, Tyerman says, William Thom, Henry Taylor, and Alexander Killiam, who were afterward distinguished as Methodist Reformers. Separation from the Church was again discussed as it was at every Conference, and decided unanimously against it. It was resolved that no books should be published without Wesley's sanction, and those to be printed at his press in London and sold by his book steward. Now and for some time before his sermons indicate his growing fears for the Methodists by becoming rich. He saw only the baleful effects, but what would Methodism be today but for its consecrated rich men? 1790. Tyerman says: "Wesley's career is drawing to a close. He himself was on the 'Delectable mountains,' basking in the sheen of the celestial city, but all around him, or rather beneath him, was darkness and confusion." The French Revolution impended and England was filled with its alarms and doctrinal divisions. January 1, Wesley wrote: "I am now an old man, decayed from head to foot: my eyes are dim; my right hand shakes much; my mouth is hot and dry every morning; I have a lingering fever almost every day; my motion is weak and slow. However, blessed be God, I do not [13] slack my labor; I can preach and write still." He staunchly holds to every autocratic principle of his discipline. January 13, he writes to John Mason, the assistant at St. Austell circuit: "As long as I live, the people shall have no share in choosing either stewards or leaders among the Methodists . . . We are no republicans and never intend to be. It would be better for these, that are so minded, [14] to go quietly away." Historically this is of moment, as the sequel of this work will show, that the principle here reaffirmed should be coupled with another laid down in the Dewsbury chapel case already adverted to; in this, however, the affirmation is a fallacy to be hereafter exposed: — "With respect to Dewsbury House, there never was any dispute about the property of preaching houses; that was an artful misrepresentation; but merely the appointing of preachers to them." Again, "Observe, here is no dispute about the right of houses at all. I have no right to any preaching house in England. [15] What I claim is a right of stationing the preachers." Yet the Deed of Declaration already entered in the High Court of Chancery was enacted principally because all the Methodist chapels and other

no longer." He was seriously sick during this period — diabetes threatened, but under treatment from<br />

his faithful and confidential physician, Dr. Whitehead, it abated, though he suffered more or less<br />

with it to his decease. His buoyant spirits at this time were remarked by many. He held his Irish<br />

Conference, now numbering some sixty, of whom forty or more were present. He compliments them<br />

in the strongest terms, and they have never ceased to be worthy of it. On the Conference Sunday<br />

Wesley and his preachers attended service at St. Patrick's, and heard the dean preach, "a serious,<br />

useful sermon." The Irish preachers were to a man true to the Church. On the 12th of July he bid<br />

adieu to Ireland forever. The scene of parting was most affecting. — "Not a few fell on the old man's<br />

neck and kissed him." About this time in a private letter occurs the sentence, "Dr. Coke made two<br />

[12]<br />

or three little alterations in the prayer-book without my knowledge." It is quoted as a pointer for<br />

future use.<br />

On the 28th of July, 1789, the forty-sixth session of Conference began in Leeds. Two hundred and<br />

eighty-eight preachers received appointments. The societies continued to grow. Circuits and<br />

missions, 109, not including Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, and the numbers in society 74,254.<br />

What may be called the Conference sermon was preached by a local preacher, James Hamilton,<br />

M.D., perhaps the only instance of the kind in English Methodism. It was an able discourse, met with<br />

Wesley's approbation, was printed and widely circulated. About 130 preachers were present,<br />

according to Atmore, and of these 115 signed a paper favoring the settlement of the chapels<br />

according to the Conference plan, and among them, Tyerman says, William Thom, Henry Taylor,<br />

and Alexander Killiam, who were afterward distinguished as <strong>Methodist</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>ers. Separation from<br />

the Church was again discussed as it was at every Conference, and decided unanimously against it.<br />

It was resolved that no books should be published without Wesley's sanction, and those to be printed<br />

at his press in London and sold by his book steward. Now and for some time before his sermons<br />

indicate his growing fears for the <strong>Methodist</strong>s by becoming rich. He saw only the baleful effects, but<br />

what would Methodism be today but for its consecrated rich men?<br />

1790. Tyerman says: "Wesley's career is drawing to a close. He himself was on the 'Delectable<br />

mountains,' basking in the sheen of the celestial city, but all around him, or rather beneath him, was<br />

darkness and confusion." The French Revolution impended and England was filled with its alarms<br />

and doctrinal divisions. January 1, Wesley wrote: "I am now an old man, decayed from head to foot:<br />

my eyes are dim; my right hand shakes much; my mouth is hot and dry every morning; I have a<br />

lingering fever almost every day; my motion is weak and slow. However, blessed be God, I do not<br />

[13]<br />

slack my labor; I can preach and write still." He staunchly holds to every autocratic principle of<br />

his discipline. January 13, he writes to John Mason, the assistant at St. Austell circuit: "As long as<br />

I live, the people shall have no share in choosing either stewards or leaders among the <strong>Methodist</strong>s<br />

. . . We are no republicans and never intend to be. It would be better for these, that are so minded,<br />

[14]<br />

to go quietly away." Historically this is of moment, as the sequel of this work will show, that the<br />

principle here reaffirmed should be coupled with another laid down in the Dewsbury chapel case<br />

already adverted to; in this, however, the affirmation is a fallacy to be hereafter exposed: — "With<br />

respect to Dewsbury House, there never was any dispute about the property of preaching houses; that<br />

was an artful misrepresentation; but merely the appointing of preachers to them." Again, "Observe,<br />

here is no dispute about the right of houses at all. I have no right to any preaching house in England.<br />

[15]<br />

What I claim is a right of stationing the preachers." Yet the Deed of Declaration already entered<br />

in the High Court of Chancery was enacted principally because all the <strong>Methodist</strong> chapels and other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!