21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ordained Henry Moore and Thomas Rankin, names conspicuous in Methodism on both sides of the<br />

ocean. Tyerman says he thinks these complete the list of Wesley's ordinations.<br />

The correspondence that ensued between Wesley and his brother Charles anent these things in<br />

1785 is tender, but decisive. Reference has already been made to it. Tyerman says of it: "Wesley<br />

failed to grapple with his brother's question; or rather, he declined. Charles' point evidently was the<br />

same as Lord Mansfield's — 'Ordination was separation.' No doubt this was strictly accurate. Wesley<br />

was too keen-sighted not to see it; but he was too much of a churchman to acknowledge it. He felt<br />

himself unable to reply to his brother's argument; and therefore really did not attempt to reply at all."<br />

[15]<br />

It helped on the divisions which occurred after his decease, provoked by the Deed of Declaration.<br />

Ordination and the administration of the ordinances were not assented to. Pawson says: "Had the<br />

preachers after his death only acted upon his plan, and quietly granted the people who desired the<br />

[16]<br />

sacraments that privilege, no division would have taken place." He, however, was one of the<br />

ordained and strongly prejudiced in favor of all Wesley did, and stands alone among the preachers<br />

in the opinion that Wesley meant to ordain bishops when he laid hands on Coke and Mather — "In<br />

order therefore to preserve all that was valuable in the Church of England, among the <strong>Methodist</strong>s,<br />

he ordained Mr. Mather and Dr. Coke bishops. These he undoubtedly designed should ordain others.<br />

[17]<br />

Mr. Mather told us so at the Manchester conference of 1791." But the English preachers would<br />

not have it, so that it was not until 1795 that the administration of the ordinances was authorized by<br />

the Wesleyan Conference, and it was not until 1836 that ordination by imposition of hands was<br />

enacted and became the "standing rule and usage in future years." Let Tyerman as the most impartial<br />

of Wesley's biographers close the case for the nonce. Logically, the ordinations made Wesley a<br />

Dissenter: "Wesley refuses to acknowledge this; but feeling the impossibility of the thing, he<br />

declined to attempt refuting it. With great inconsistency, he still persisted in calling himself a<br />

member of the Church of England; and, as will be seen, to the day of his death told the <strong>Methodist</strong>s,<br />

that if they left the Church they would leave him. All things considered this is not surprising; but it<br />

was absurd. Great allowance must be made for Wesley; but to reconcile Wesley's practice and<br />

profession in this matter, during the last seven years of his eventful life, is simply impossible."<br />

The year 1784 was not memorable except for these dual events just considered. Wesley continued<br />

his unexampled labors for a man of eighty-one, traveling, preaching, writing, and publishing. Among<br />

the last was "The Sunday Service for the <strong>Methodist</strong>s in America," or his abridgment of the Prayer<br />

Book which Coke carried with him to America in the printed sheets, perhaps, as more portable for<br />

a long sea-voyage. It plays a most important part in the Wesley-Coke entanglement, as will be seen<br />

in the future.<br />

*************************************

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!