21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

arguments, except as it relates to its effects upon British Methodism, the consideration will be<br />

deferred, to avoid so much anticipation as would be requisite.<br />

Suffice it to recite the main facts. It must be remembered that this was an age of prelatical<br />

pretensions. Ordination, instead of being that simple New Testament setting apart by laying on of<br />

hands, a custom borrowed from the Old Testament method of reverential blessing, with no priestly<br />

entail whatever, came to be an essential of hierarchal exclusiveness, as it grew in its departures from<br />

New Testament ideals, from the third century onward. Deacons were ordained as an order in the<br />

ministry, and Elders as a superior grade, and Bishops as transcending both, and then Archbishops<br />

in the ascending gradation, ultimating in the crowned and infallible Pope, an incarnation of<br />

ecclesiastical Paternalism. Apostolical Succession was the established dogma of the National Church<br />

of England. It was firmly held by Charles Wesley to his decease. John Wesley, when about forty<br />

years of age, by extending his reading and laying himself open, by the modifying force of his<br />

environments, to intellectual conviction, became satisfied from Lord King's "Account of the<br />

Primitive Church," that there was no authority for an order of Bishops from the Scriptures.<br />

Subsequently Bishop Stillingfleet's "Irenicum" convinced him that the Apostolical Succession was<br />

"a fable which no man ever did or could prove." But he remained a stanch Churchman to the end,<br />

not accepting the logical results of such conclusions. He therefore insisted that the members of his<br />

United Societies should go to the National Church for the ordinances, and steadily refused, until late<br />

in life, to relieve any of his lay-preachers of this disability. He resisted, with all his effective<br />

authority, the clamors of both his people and his preachers, fortifying his conduct with the one<br />

reason: the Church (kirks) were near enough to his societies for practical purposes.<br />

The circumstances were widely different in America. The English helpers he had sent over were<br />

mostly of the same opinion, and Asbury, his General Assistant, was an emphatic believer in<br />

Apostolic Succession, as has been already found. But at the close of the Revolutionary War the<br />

established Episcopal Church in America had been so scattered and peeled that, for hundreds of<br />

miles together, her deserted kirks had no rectors, so that not their own people only, but the<br />

<strong>Methodist</strong>s, now fifteen thousand strong, were absolutely without the ordinances: their children<br />

remained unbaptized, and the Lord's Supper was never administered except under rebellion against<br />

Asbury's authority. Appreciating the urgency of the situation, and having good reasons to know that<br />

if much longer delayed he would be completely overborne, he wrote beseechingly to Wesley to come<br />

over himself, or send a National Church clergyman to relieve the difficulty. He could not go himself<br />

— his age forbade it. He applied to Bishop Lowth, setting forth the need for an ordained clergyman<br />

to be sent to America, but he was refused. He was in a strait betwixt two. Should he send himself<br />

a clergyman, or permit the authority of Asbury, and through him of himself, to decay? He anxiously<br />

consulted Fletcher and others of his confidants, hoping for directive, favorable advice to the purpose<br />

which was crystallizing in his own mind; but they, with one consent, disapproved of his assuming<br />

the episcopal prerogative of ordination, as understood in the National Church — any other they did<br />

[7]<br />

not understand at all. In this emergency he thought of Coke, who largely shared his confidence.<br />

He was a presbyter of the National Church, equal with himself in this respect. He was fully qualified<br />

by education, and his administration of the Irish Conference, now for some time committed to him<br />

by Wesley, all conspired in favor of this choice. He appears to have given him some intimation of<br />

his purpose. Drew says he did it in February, 1784. He would send him as a General Superintendent<br />

a word-coinage of his own — not, perhaps, to supersede Asbury, but to ordain some of the American

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!