History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
the Pretender excitement in the realm, these tracts, and his subsequent "Calm Address to the American Colonies," which he appropriated from Dr. Johnson's diatribe, and when detected, frankly admitted, and was condoned by Johnson, who quizzically approved the enlarged circulation it gave his philippie. The thirtieth Conference was held in London, August 3, 1773. Scant notice is taken of these Conferences by most of the historians. Tyerman is far more satisfactory, because he had access to materials not obtainable until his later day. In this way he furnishes opportunity for reflection upon Wesley's monopolization of the printing and publishing business, as well as "the care of all the churches," which Paul found his sufficient burden. Not often does a clergyman carry a business head upon his shoulders, and Methodism is about the only Protestant organization in either hemisphere which relegates temporalities as well as everything else to its ministry. During this year Wesley found that there must be something wrong with his book business. An account of stock was taken, and the inventory rendered showed that he was in debt to printers and binders 500, and yet had books on hand whose gross value was near 11,000. Some took up the suspicion that his wife by means of false keys had obtained access to the book steward's cash and helped herself, but there was no conclusive proof. His book steward, Samuel Franks, a man of great probity, failing to unravel the mystery, fell into insanity and hanged himself. The discrepancy remained unsolved; the possessor of a large amount of property, Wesley was yet seriously in debt. The precedent thus established and entailed upon the Legal Hundred was the paternal origin of future "Book Concerns" in England and America, and one of the boastings of the parent bodies. In the sequel of this History it will be shown a grave error of economic judgment and of calamitous denominational strife. On the 9th of August, 1774, the thirty-first Conference was held at Bristol. The membership reported was 35,612, showing a gain this year of 2340. Among the names received at this Conference were James Rodgers and Samuel Bradford, both eminent in after years, the latter esteemed as "the Demosthenes of Methodism." Dr. Adam Clarke, speaking of his eloquence, says, "I have never heard his equal," — and he had heard Whitefield. The former, a successful preacher, the husband of the saintly Hester Ann Rodgers, he suffered much from persecutions, attended Wesley in his last journey, and was at his bedside when he departed. Wesley was averse to having his portrait taken, more because of the sittings required and loss of time, as he esteemed it, than any other reason. But two or three pictures of him were taken, of which Tyerman gives excellent copies. This year he was prevailed on to allow a cast of his face to be taken. The Conference of 1774 was largely occupied with temporal matters. A Miss March, writing of it August 23, says among other things, "The preachers said there was much concord among them, [2] and one of them observed Mr. Wesley seemed to do all the business himself." The method of the Conferences was for Wesley to ask questions and solicit opinions in answer, but there were no votes taken; Wesley decided, and that ended it; and this method was perpetuated after his demise and came over into American Methodism. No doubt it expedited business, but what of its reflex influence? They sat with closed doors, the people were excluded; and as for the preachers under such a training, all individuality was lost; they gave up everything to the presiding genius; happily their veneration for and confidence in him were such, and he proved himself so worthy of both, that as a rule "concord" reigned. As was inevitable, however, under the system cliques formed under the
leadership of the most self-asserting of the preachers as his death was foreshadowed, and the question who should be greatest distracted the Wesleyan Conference for years afterward. Wesley kept on writing and publishing extensively during this year. 1775 saw the English crown and the American colonies in conflict. The revolt was raised in the latter against the principle of taxation without representation. This was the occasion of Wesley's "Calm Address to the American Colonies," which was a pure abridgment of Dr. Johnson's "Taxation no Tyranny," yet Wesley signed it "By the Rev. John Wesley, M.A." Prior to reading Johnson his sympathies were with the colonies, and five years before, in the incipiency of the Revolution, he published a pamphlet to this end. He was bitterly attacked for his change of views. Tyerman naively suggests: "Wesley had a perfect right to change his opinions but when a man like Wesley does that, he can hardly expect to escape unfriendly criticism. The world dislikes changelings and hesitates to [3] trust them." A wider application of this truth will be made in the body of this History. Fletcher and Olivers came to his defense against a host of pamphleteers who lampooned and maligned him. But he needed no defense as to his motives, whatever might be said of his judgment in the matter. In June of this year Wesley had a violent illness of fever, and for three days his life was despaired of; indeed, the rumor obtained that he had died, but he marvelously recovered and lived for fifteen years longer. The thirty-second Conference was held at Leeds, August 1, 1775, and was largely attended, and rigid inquiry was made into the qualifications of the preachers. [4] The membership had increased 2533. Daniel McAllum was in the plan of appointments. He labored mostly in Scotland and continued in the field for near sixty years. He merits this passing mention. Also John Valton, a great revivalist and a man of mark for near twenty years. The thirty-third Conference was held in London, August 6, 1776. The total membership was 39,826, including the American societies at the census of the previous year. Fletcher's health failed, and Wesley invited him to travel with him, which he did for some time, and lived nine years longer. He spent three years in Switzerland, and on returning to England married Miss Bosanquet, memorable name in Methodism, and he died August 14, 1785. But as Fletcher had failed him it is a coincidence at least that in the same year he formed the acquaintance of Thomas Coke, than whom no man, Fletcher excepted, had such an influence over him for the remainder of his life. Wesley was now seventy-three years old. Coke was a young man of twenty-nine. No character in Methodism is so difficult to mensurate, and none as to whom there is so wide a divergence of opinion as to his merits and demerits, which were so striking that admission of his faults and frailties is about the only point upon which his critics agree and the one salient and redeeming feature of his eventful life, — the missionary of Methodism by eminence for the whole world. The key to this divergence of opinion is not hard to find. Impartial biography seems an impossibility, as human nature is constituted. This declaration is made because of the fact that there lies before the writer Whitehead's "Life of the Wesleys," in which Dr. Coke is painted by a man whose opportunities for correct estimate are unsurpassed, except by Samuel Drew, Coke's literary executor, whose biography of Coke is also before me. Whitehead's work betrays a coloring biased by his party affiliations among the cliques into which the Conference divided, after Wesley's demise. It was the party of the people and of liberal administration. Wesley's Journal reflected his view of Coke as influenced by consecrated motives, while condoning his ambition and the indirections he
- Page 1 and 2: WESLEYAN HERITAGE Library M. E. Chu
- Page 3 and 4: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 5 and 6: world over; as well as for contrast
- Page 7 and 8: No pretension is made to literary s
- Page 9 and 10: considered — The first missionary
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER 19 1779-1781 — The "regul
- Page 13 and 14: Was it mailed before or after he he
- Page 15 and 16: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 17 and 18: the Methodist Societies, though thr
- Page 19 and 20: The period from 1784 to 1792 will b
- Page 21 and 22: ENDNOTES 1 Otherwise called the Pol
- Page 23 and 24: His private Journal, which came int
- Page 25 and 26: with the hope that, whenever such a
- Page 27 and 28: ENDNOTES 1 Whitehead's "Life of the
- Page 29 and 30: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 31 and 32: His father's health failing in 1734
- Page 33 and 34: The period from 1739 to 1744 was a
- Page 35 and 36: 1 "Mutual Rights," Vol. 1. No. 21,
- Page 37 and 38: places. Stevens says the third Conf
- Page 39 and 40: were necessary for an enduring orga
- Page 41 and 42: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 43 and 44: chapel seats. Breaking bread in the
- Page 45 and 46: severely, but not unjustly. Preachi
- Page 47 and 48: ut for the children, the boys only
- Page 49: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 53 and 54: deliverance from a "Methodist curat
- Page 55 and 56: sit apart, which had been violated
- Page 57 and 58: 1 Tyerman's "Life,'' Vol. III. p. 1
- Page 59 and 60: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 61 and 62: a deed of this kind, that I have go
- Page 63 and 64: arguments, except as it relates to
- Page 65 and 66: as, it was, no doubt, sincere. The
- Page 67 and 68: ordained Henry Moore and Thomas Ran
- Page 69 and 70: Church. Upon this the meeting was a
- Page 71 and 72: society in Plymouth. He was a man,
- Page 73 and 74: nothing else save the Arminian Maga
- Page 75 and 76: no longer." He was seriously sick d
- Page 77 and 78: eached 2828. The membership was 76,
- Page 79 and 80: * See Appendix to Dr. Kewley's "Inq
- Page 81 and 82: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 83 and 84: He said soon after, "I will get up,
- Page 85 and 86: short, and the design itself was sp
- Page 87 and 88: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 89 and 90: week of Wesley's death he wrote: "M
- Page 91 and 92: stewards, the admission and expulsi
- Page 93 and 94: wrote like a mountain torrent. Stro
- Page 95 and 96: present purpose reads: "But when on
- Page 97 and 98: y the calendar, must be used wherev
- Page 99 and 100: presidency the Conference would not
the Pretender excitement in the realm, these tracts, and his subsequent "Calm Address to the<br />
American Colonies," which he appropriated from Dr. Johnson's diatribe, and when detected, frankly<br />
admitted, and was condoned by Johnson, who quizzically approved the enlarged circulation it gave<br />
his philippie.<br />
The thirtieth Conference was held in London, August 3, 1773. Scant notice is taken of these<br />
Conferences by most of the historians. Tyerman is far more satisfactory, because he had access to<br />
materials not obtainable until his later day. In this way he furnishes opportunity for reflection upon<br />
Wesley's monopolization of the printing and publishing business, as well as "the care of all the<br />
churches," which Paul found his sufficient burden. Not often does a clergyman carry a business head<br />
upon his shoulders, and Methodism is about the only Protestant organization in either hemisphere<br />
which relegates temporalities as well as everything else to its ministry. During this year Wesley<br />
found that there must be something wrong with his book business. An account of stock was taken,<br />
and the inventory rendered showed that he was in debt to printers and binders 500, and yet had books<br />
on hand whose gross value was near 11,000. Some took up the suspicion that his wife by means of<br />
false keys had obtained access to the book steward's cash and helped herself, but there was no<br />
conclusive proof. His book steward, Samuel Franks, a man of great probity, failing to unravel the<br />
mystery, fell into insanity and hanged himself. The discrepancy remained unsolved; the possessor<br />
of a large amount of property, Wesley was yet seriously in debt. The precedent thus established and<br />
entailed upon the Legal Hundred was the paternal origin of future "Book Concerns" in England and<br />
America, and one of the boastings of the parent bodies. In the sequel of this <strong>History</strong> it will be shown<br />
a grave error of economic judgment and of calamitous denominational strife.<br />
On the 9th of August, 1774, the thirty-first Conference was held at Bristol. The membership<br />
reported was 35,612, showing a gain this year of 2340. Among the names received at this Conference<br />
were James Rodgers and Samuel Bradford, both eminent in after years, the latter esteemed as "the<br />
Demosthenes of Methodism." Dr. Adam Clarke, speaking of his eloquence, says, "I have never heard<br />
his equal," — and he had heard Whitefield. The former, a successful preacher, the husband of the<br />
saintly Hester Ann Rodgers, he suffered much from persecutions, attended Wesley in his last<br />
journey, and was at his bedside when he departed.<br />
Wesley was averse to having his portrait taken, more because of the sittings required and loss of<br />
time, as he esteemed it, than any other reason. But two or three pictures of him were taken, of which<br />
Tyerman gives excellent copies. This year he was prevailed on to allow a cast of his face to be taken.<br />
The Conference of 1774 was largely occupied with temporal matters. A Miss March, writing of<br />
it August 23, says among other things, "The preachers said there was much concord among them,<br />
[2]<br />
and one of them observed Mr. Wesley seemed to do all the business himself." The method of the<br />
Conferences was for Wesley to ask questions and solicit opinions in answer, but there were no votes<br />
taken; Wesley decided, and that ended it; and this method was perpetuated after his demise and came<br />
over into American Methodism. No doubt it expedited business, but what of its reflex influence?<br />
They sat with closed doors, the people were excluded; and as for the preachers under such a training,<br />
all individuality was lost; they gave up everything to the presiding genius; happily their veneration<br />
for and confidence in him were such, and he proved himself so worthy of both, that as a rule<br />
"concord" reigned. As was inevitable, however, under the system cliques formed under the