History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
4 This case in substance is that Rev. C. F. Klein, missionary at Yokohama, Japan, prospecting for a place to work nearer the interior, selected Nagoya, then unoccupied by the M. E. Church in any form. He made his purpose known to Rev. Mr. Soper and to McClay, superintendent of their mission work, informing them that he thought of occupying Nagoya, and if they did not purpose so doing under the invitation to "cooperate in foreign fields by churches of the same theology"; and his approaches were met with a friendly intimation that the territory was open to him, as they could not then occupy. He occupied accordingly, and built a house. This was in 1887. In 1888 Bishop Fowler made a visit to the place, and though he must have known of the occupation, selected a site hard by, and commenced operations for the M. E. Church, thus ignoring the ironical plan of non-interference of the Methodisms abroad with each other's work. The full particulars are voluminous, but can be furnished to any one doubting the substantial truth of these allegations. 5 The writer is indebted for these facts and others to be stated to J. W. Bond's letter to Bishop McKendree, from which all other historians have likewise gleaned, and recollections given him by Rev. Thomas McCormick, of Baltimore, who was the last survivor of the twelve pall-bearers, having lived until February 20, 1883. He was one of the eleven ministers and preachers who were expelled the Methodist Episcopal Church in 1827, for their advocacy of Reform through the Wesleyan Repository and the Union Societies. Some ten years ago a person appeared in the office of the writer, then editor of the Methodist Protestant, and exhibited the original class book of the Light Street Station containing the names of the eleven, and after each name in a round, bold hand the word "Expelled" written. The writer failed to secure the book under promise from the holder that he would return it to the officiary of the Light Street church, but subsequent inquiry showed that he never did it, and the book is probably irrevocably lost. The General Methodist Episcopal Conference of 1880, in Baltimore City, honored itself and the man by introducing McCormick to it in his proper character, and as the last survivor of the Asbury funeral. The writer recently made a careful examination of the files of The American and Commercial Daily Advertiser, of Baltimore, for May, 1816, with the remarkable result that on the 9th of May, a brief notice is given of the Asbury funeral, and all clergymen invited. On the 10th, it publishes the Bond letter to McKendree of more than a column in length, giving all the particulars of his last illness and death minutely. But on the 11th, and thereafter, not a single line is given as to the funeral. It can be accounted for only on the theory that, as Black affirms, the whole of Baltimore town of that day, either attended the funeral or heard of it, so that reportorially the paper deemed it unnecessary to publish what everybody knew, so universal was the interest it excited. Bond's letter is under date, "Spottsylvania, April 1, 1816." Rev. McCormick, before referred to, in 1882, then in his ninety-first year, presented the writer with a book heretofore noticed, "The Conference, or Sketches of Wesleyan Methodism," published in 1824, at Bridgeton, N.J. It is in verse, and as appendices, there is an account of Asbury with a pen-portrait of great merit, and also a Letter to the unknown author* from Rev. William Black, General Superintendent of the Canada work of the Wesleyan Conference, and who was a visitor at the General Conference of 1816. He gives an extended account of Asbury's funeral, from which citations have been made in the running text. He also informs that with Bishop McKendree they headed the procession before the coffin, borne by the pall-bearers, as in that day carriages and hearses were unknown at funerals, and that in the procession were the Protestant Episcopal Bishop, and the governor of the state, and "several other ministers of different communions." Black made the concluding prayer after McKendree's address. This letter is found nowhere else, and the book itself so rare that the writer has never heard of but one other copy. Around the margins of this printed letter
McCormick has written in a legible hand in blue pencil his recollection of Black, and other facts in connection with the book and the funeral. *Wakeley, in his Heroes of Methodism," says it was Rev. Joshua Marsden, a Wesleyan missionary, who was in this country in 1812-14, and that it was first published in London in 1815. This is an error, as the book refers to Asbury as dead, which was not until 1816. The true date was 1820. Asbury refers to Marsden, see "Journal," 1813. 6 In one of the debates of the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church in 1888, Rev. Dr. A. B. Leonard, one of the missionary secretaries, said, "I know, and you know, that if the Methodist Episcopal Church were to be organized today, it could not be on its present basis." It was a truth that every one must have felt. Not that any body of Christians would not have the right to select it with all its anomalies, but because plainly not in accord with the Primitive Church system as exemplified by that Church, and out of analogy with the equality of Christian brotherhood. *************************************
- Page 357 and 358: when actively employed, and provisi
- Page 359 and 360: etween Front and Second streets, an
- Page 361 and 362: in the society even stripling preac
- Page 363 and 364: 1 Lee's "History," pp. 194, 195. EN
- Page 365 and 366: is desperately broken, yet he keeps
- Page 367 and 368: conducted well." He did not offer h
- Page 369 and 370: of the general conference, and in t
- Page 371 and 372: . I leave you to make a prudent use
- Page 373 and 374: his words are eulogistically true.
- Page 375 and 376: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 377 and 378: until finally the illegality of it
- Page 379 and 380: who had been elected Book Agent to
- Page 381 and 382: interred under the altar of the Wes
- Page 383 and 384: ENDNOTES 1 One was held at Cabbin C
- Page 385 and 386: affirmed nor denied the truth of th
- Page 387 and 388: 3. Each Annual Conference respectiv
- Page 389 and 390: The smoke of the argumentative batt
- Page 391 and 392: find its Constitution, if any there
- Page 393 and 394: views. Such apologies for his after
- Page 395 and 396: ENDNOTES 1 Boehm says there was pre
- Page 397 and 398: those of the Methodist Protestant C
- Page 399 and 400: to his death a bosom friend and cou
- Page 401 and 402: date — " We have ridden two hundr
- Page 403 and 404: Eutaw Street church pulpit. On the
- Page 405 and 406: disputed. It never has been called
- Page 407: ENDNOTES 1 November 6, 1820, Kingst
- Page 411 and 412: as a scandal upon Mr. Wesley, thoug
- Page 413 and 414: and good man, and a bead-roll of ot
- Page 415 and 416: liberal principles. To this Griffit
- Page 417 and 418: and many others, and uniformly defe
- Page 419 and 420: pioneers it may be said that in the
- Page 421 and 422: argument against innovation. Tradit
- Page 423 and 424: popular Episcopal Church of America
- Page 425 and 426: to the joint authorship of the Circ
- Page 427 and 428: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 429 and 430: apparently. Moore's denial was not
- Page 431 and 432: y Ralph Spoor, London, etc., page 5
- Page 433 and 434: Liverpool I observed that I should,
- Page 435 and 436: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 437 and 438: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 439 and 440: command, when he told the elders no
- Page 441 and 442: themselves to the ministry of the s
- Page 443 and 444: church with true wisdom to combine
- Page 445 and 446: Valentine Lucas, Alexander Clark, A
- Page 447 and 448: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 449 and 450: General Conference of 1884 the Soci
- Page 451 and 452: The report of the W. F. M. S. to th
- Page 453 and 454: The General Conference of 1888 divi
- Page 455 and 456: successful labors. The Board is reg
- Page 457 and 458: While the various enterprises alrea
McCormick has written in a legible hand in blue pencil his recollection of Black, and other facts in<br />
connection with the book and the funeral.<br />
*Wakeley, in his Heroes of Methodism," says it was Rev. Joshua Marsden, a Wesleyan<br />
missionary, who was in this country in 1812-14, and that it was first published in London in 1815.<br />
This is an error, as the book refers to Asbury as dead, which was not until 1816. The true date was<br />
1820. Asbury refers to Marsden, see "Journal," 1813.<br />
6 In one of the debates of the General Conference of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Episcopal Church in 1888, Rev.<br />
Dr. A. B. Leonard, one of the missionary secretaries, said, "I know, and you know, that if the<br />
<strong>Methodist</strong> Episcopal Church were to be organized today, it could not be on its present basis." It was<br />
a truth that every one must have felt. Not that any body of Christians would not have the right to<br />
select it with all its anomalies, but because plainly not in accord with the Primitive Church system<br />
as exemplified by that Church, and out of analogy with the equality of Christian brotherhood.<br />
*************************************