21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

those of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Protestant Church. A few extracts only can be given, "They felt straitened in<br />

their religious rights and privileges, under the Episcopal mode of Church government." At a<br />

subsequent Convention on the 5th of February, they adopted a Constitution and Articles of Religion<br />

and a Discipline. The Articles and the means of grace are those practically of the Old Church; the<br />

Constitution gives a "Declaration of Rights," "All power for the government and regulation of the<br />

Church, under God, belongs to, and of right is at the control of, the Church; therefore the right of<br />

priests to rule, as well as of kings to reign, we view as contrary to the gospel of Christ, and<br />

inconsistent with the natural, original, and inherent rights of man." It provided for quarterly, annual,<br />

and general conferences on a basis of equal representation in the last two, of ministers and laymen.<br />

Visiting elders are provided for to attend quarterly and other meetings. The other machinery is<br />

<strong>Methodist</strong>ic. Actual statistics of its after growth through thirty years are not at command, but is<br />

estimated at from three to five thousand. Ultimately their societies in large part were merged into the<br />

<strong>Methodist</strong> Protestant Church. That it seriously affected the Old Church is evident when the statistics<br />

are consulted. The gain in that Church for 1812 was 8017, and for 1813, 14,596, while the decrease<br />

in 1814, was 2750. Bangs puts it down to the war. It had much to do with it, undoubtedly, as well<br />

as the Canada defection as a part of it, but the <strong>Reform</strong> movement most accounts for the decline,<br />

though not acknowledged by any of her historians.<br />

Why did not this movement more fully succeed? Its principles were scriptural and amenable to<br />

reason, but, as in the O'Kelly schism, the personal equation was too conspicuous. The hard soil of<br />

New England, always unfriendly to Methodism, was against the liberal tentation. If the social and<br />

business and organized opposition of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Episcopal Church was as strenuously and<br />

unrelentingly put forth as it was against the <strong>Methodist</strong> Protestant Church of 1830-40, the marvel is<br />

that it was not incontinently strangled in its birth-throes. The proscription and ostracism were<br />

fearfully intimidating. It was circumscribed in its source, and hedged about more and more in its<br />

attempts to enlarge its area. This, as well as the settled determination of its leaders not to secede or<br />

to sympathize with secession, made it impossible for the <strong>Reform</strong>ers of the Snethen, Shinn, Jennings,<br />

McCaine, Brown, Dorsey, French, and Hill type of 1820-30 to affiliate with it. The pride of personal<br />

leadership made it impossible that the Britt-Bailey <strong>Reform</strong>ers should consent to absorption by the<br />

latter <strong>Reform</strong> until necessity made it a virtue to coalesce. The same remarks are applicable to the<br />

secession of William M. Stillwell, one of the ablest of the itinerant preachers of his day, who<br />

organized in New York, 1819-20, and gathered some societies on liberal principles, but there was<br />

lacking the cohesive power of a common sympathy. Such schisms cannot long survive the personal<br />

life and posthumous influence of the projectors, and, as schisms, are, for the most part, intrinsically<br />

ill-advised. A number of his adherents were absorbed by the <strong>Methodist</strong> Protestants and found thereby<br />

a congenial Church home. Both these movements, however, trace their inspiration and execution to<br />

the Episcopal system as embodied and administered in the Asburyan Church.<br />

The General Conference of 1816 had been appointed for Baltimore on the 1st of May. Boehm says<br />

it assembled at Light Street church. Bangs furnishes a full list of the members, 106 in number.<br />

Asbury was dead, and McKendree, though present, was in feeble health. His episcopal address was<br />

presented by Douglass, and referred with Asbury's valedictory, previously prepared, to appropriate<br />

committees. On the 7th, the presiding elder question was brought forward, the strong minority in<br />

favor of an elective method maintaining heart and hope. It was put in various forms in<br />

accommodation to the moods of those who were interested in it. The Conference resolved itself into

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!