21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

who had been elected Book Agent to succeed Dickins, was reelected, and the Book Concern<br />

removed to New York. Asbury dismisses the Conference with a few lines. May 7 (the 6th was a<br />

Sabbath): "Our General Conference began. What was done the revised form of discipline will show.<br />

There were attempts made upon the ruling eldership. We had a great talk. I asked little upon any<br />

subject; and was kept in peace. I preached but twice.<br />

"The Lord did not own the ministerial labors of the General Conference." Bangs gives a full list<br />

of the names of those in attendance and makes it 105, seven being declared ineligible by reason of<br />

time disqualification. Stevens, as usual, gives details. William Black, who was a visitor at the<br />

Conference, 1784, is again present just twenty years later. The unequal representation of the<br />

preachers gave much force to the renewed attempts to organize the Conference on a delegated plan.<br />

Stevens alone refers to it: "It was deferred to the next session." Snethen furnishes an item. He had<br />

discussed it with Asbury in their travels, and he makes this record: "I was ignorant of Mr. Asbury's<br />

sentiments, about a representative General Conference, when I broached the subject to him. We<br />

discussed the subject between ourselves, and it was agreed that I should support it at the General<br />

Conference. The motion, however, was lost by a large majority; and when it was carried (1808) I was<br />

no longer a member of the General Conference. I will not take upon me to say that Mr. Asbury had<br />

not the plan in his mind, when I first made known to him my thoughts upon the subject."<br />

Hitherto there had been no restriction as to the appointments. The preachers were sent for six<br />

months, or longer, as the Bishop might deem best, but some were retained through the pressure of<br />

influence for three years. A restrictive rule was now enacted which forbade the appointment of a<br />

preacher longer than two years. It is embalmed in <strong>Methodist</strong> history as the "Restrictive Rule." Asbury<br />

was pleased with this regulation as it came to the assistance of the appointing power. It was probably<br />

a wise regulation in its day, but it became so incorporated with the fundamental law as to require<br />

special legislation for any change of it. For more than fifty years it was jealously guarded as a kind<br />

of fetish which augured and secured the success of <strong>Methodist</strong> preaching. But with the increasing<br />

diligence and spirituality of the surrounding Christian denominations, and the peculiar environment<br />

of city pastoral work, the disadvantages of such an iron-clad law grew upon the convictions of the<br />

most thoughtful, and gradual extensions were made of the rule, more by the pressure brought to bear<br />

by the ministry than by the active interference of the laity, who though so thoroughly mistrusted and<br />

deemed incompetent to share in the legislative functions of the Church, have ever been its most loyal<br />

and conservative force, until, at this date, the time limit has been prolonged to five years.<br />

A ruling was made that Bishops should allow Annual Conferences to sit at least a week. Hitherto<br />

they closed them at pleasure, often after two or three days. It gave more time, if not more liberty of<br />

debate, in these bodies. The presiding Bishop entertained, or refused to entertain motions, and<br />

controlled debate within such limits that there was little semblance of a deliberative assembly. The<br />

title of "Quarterly Meeting Conference" was given the quarterly gathering of the officiary on the<br />

local work. Provision was made for the election of a presiding elder to preside at Conferences in the<br />

absence of a Bishop. The law against the marriage of Church members with "unawakened persons"<br />

was changed from expulsion to being put back on trial for six months. Rev. William Colbert, who<br />

was a member of the Conference, says of it: "I am possessed with awful fears that this Conference<br />

as a body will lift the flood-gates of corruption." It was recommended to Annual Conferences that<br />

preachers be restrained from publications of any kind before submitting their manuscripts to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!