21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the general conference, and in this state of uncanceled suspension his promise remained until his<br />

[4]<br />

eyes were closed in death." Coke remained in England after the last visit to America already noted<br />

until his return at Asbury's solicitation to attend the General Conference in May, 1800, in Baltimore.<br />

One difference between him and Asbury was that the latter was a crowned authority over his<br />

brethren and dictated accordingly, while the former exercised the authority without being crowned.<br />

He could not help meddling. An instance was his unauthorized correspondence with the Bishop of<br />

London on March 29, 1799, proposing a union of the Wesleyan Societies with the Church of<br />

England. It was repelled by the Bishop, and Coke was scarified for it by the Conference. At the<br />

General Conference of 1800 he was a welcome guest and participant. Asbury showed him every<br />

deference consistent with his own grasp of the keys. He preached the ordination sermon, and was<br />

otherwise honored. Asbury says "two days were spent in considering about Doctor Coke's return to<br />

Europe." He makes no further mention of him for this visit to America. It will be inferentially seen<br />

presently that the cordiality between them was again shadowed. The final answer of the Conference<br />

to the British brethren for Dr. Coke's services Drew gives in full the gist of it is: "We have, therefore,<br />

in compliance with your request, lent the doctor to you for a season, to return to us as soon as he<br />

conveniently can, but at the farthest by the meeting of our next General Conference." Signed, Francis<br />

Asbury, Richard Whatcoat.<br />

Somehow they had reached the conclusion that they could spare him for four years. Coke<br />

observed it all, and he made a hasty retreat to the West Indies on his missionary work for the<br />

Wesleyan Conference. He returned to England and established the Welsh missions, and was<br />

unremitting in labors until the autumn of 1803, when he again visited America. It was unsolicited<br />

and apparently unexpected. Asbury says, December 26, 1803: "To my surprise I find Bishop Coke<br />

is in Augusta [Ga.] before me. I have received letters of consequence from the North." Coke had also<br />

his American correspondents. There were ambitious schemers, plotters, and counter-plotters among<br />

the leaders, and the bishopric was the shuttlecock these battledores kept whizzing in the air. In fact,<br />

Asbury had ceased to have personal use for Bishop Coke. Whatcoat had been named coadjutor, and<br />

he had other traveling companions. He must make some disposition of Bishop Coke. "I gave Bishop<br />

Coke a plan for a journey as far as Boston, before the General Conference." It was sent to him in a<br />

letter, Drew says, under date of November 23, 1803, and addressed to him at Light Street church,<br />

Baltimore, and points out a track of nearly five thousand miles in length, a tour which would take<br />

him about nine mouths to accomplish. As the date of this letter was a month before Asbury found<br />

him with surprise in Augusta, Ga., before him, he must have known of Coke's coming and waylaid<br />

him with this letter. Drew says, "Whether he acceded to the proposal is to the writer of these pages<br />

very uncertain." Alexander McCaine says of Coke's trip from Baltimore to Augusta: "The writer was<br />

fleeing by the advice of his physicians, from the rigors of a northern winter to the South, there he fell<br />

in with Dr. Coke and traveled with him to Augusta," was a member of the General Conference the<br />

ensuing May, in Baltimore, and makes this significant mention: "And he is no less certain that he<br />

was applied to, by one in authority, in a matter relating to Dr. Coke, which no man living knows<br />

but himself; but as he has no document to prove the fact, the secret shall go down with him to the<br />

grave." [5]<br />

Asbury and McCaine were bosom friends; it shall be duly proved that no man in the connection<br />

had more of his confidence and affection. And while there can be little doubt that the "matter relating<br />

to Dr. Coke" was one of the esoteric schemes of the bishopric, the writer will not attempt to surmise

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!