21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conducted well." He did not offer his plan at any other Conference. It did not fall in with the humor<br />

of the preachers, and to press it might prove another cause of serious contention, so he dropped it.<br />

Lee and Wells accompanied him to the South, then Whatcoat joined Lee, and Wells returned, and<br />

together the first two went on with him as far as Charleston, S. C., and in accordance with the new<br />

order of the previous year of beginning the Conferences from the South northward, so as to secure<br />

better weather for Asbury. Before another year he is back in Massachusetts. Think of it, twice the<br />

length of the continent mostly horseback, for a sick man within a year. Lee attended the Charleston<br />

Conference for him; Asbury was afraid of the malaria, and says, "I believed that going to Charleston<br />

this season would end my life." The blessed work of soul-saving after the <strong>Methodist</strong> fashion was<br />

again going on. Lee says that at the close of 1797 there had been a net gain of 1999 members, the<br />

first gains reported for five years, and this small outcome is in proof how deeply the O'Kelly<br />

secession and its causes had shaken the very foundations, and how widely it had affected the public<br />

mind against the arbitrary system of Asbury, so that new converts and thoughtful people stood aloof<br />

from the Church. This will read like a novel explanation to those who have found no hint of it in<br />

other histories of these times, but every current fact vouches for its truth.<br />

During Asbury's enforced brief seasons of rest, he engaged himself in revising his Journal. This<br />

year Alexander McCaine, who will figure so largely and notably in this <strong>History</strong> thirty years later, and<br />

who was the O'Kelly of the new <strong>Reform</strong>, was received on "trial" with thirty-eight others. Honored<br />

names occur in the roster of the Conference, and the Eldership was particularly strong. Among those<br />

admitted in 1798 are Lorenzo Dow, heretofore noticed; Truman Bishop, one of the purest men of<br />

his day, and a <strong>Reform</strong>er of 1827-29, against whom calumny never raised its voice, though he set his<br />

face like a flint against the persecuting spirit and practice of his quondam brethren; and Billy<br />

Hibbard, whose eccentricities and usefulness were excelled only by Dow's. Nicholas Snethen had<br />

joined the Conference in 1794 and rapidly forged his way to the front as a young man. he had great<br />

versatility of talent, a voice of wonderful timbre and penetration, education above his peers, deep<br />

spirituality, and developed a mind more philosophical and logically prescient than any other man<br />

ever produced by early Methodism. The minutes of 1798 give nearly three pages, an extraordinary<br />

length, to an obituary of John Dickins, who died September 22, but of whom enough has been<br />

already said in this <strong>History</strong>.<br />

Comparison of statistics as to membership from 1792 to 1796, the period of the O'Kelly agitation<br />

and secession, is very uncertain if the printed minutes are followed, for notable errors occur in the<br />

summing up. A glaring one is found in the minutes of 1791, of thirteen thousand in the white<br />

[3]<br />

membership. It ought to have been easy of detection by comparing these of 1790 with those of<br />

1792, but it is carried over from the edition of Dickins in 1795 to those of 1813 without correction.<br />

And for this period a cursory reader of these minutes could not detect any declension of numbers<br />

from 1792 to 1796, yet Jesse Lee, who next to Asbury was in closest touch with the whole work,<br />

declares, after giving the aggregates according to states which are found to be perfectly accurate<br />

compared with the same in the Minutes, except that he counts white and colored together, making<br />

for 1796, 56,664, that, "We lost in numbers for this year (1796) 2627 members. We have been going<br />

back, and our numbers decreasing for three years past, in which time we have lost 10,979 members<br />

in number. The declension was mostly in the middle states, and especially where the divisive spirit<br />

most prevailed." <strong>Methodist</strong> historians do not cite these figures of Lee's, but, by citing the not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!