21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is desperately broken, yet he keeps right on, and it is simply amazing to follow his path as laid down<br />

in his Journal; he is over the whole expansive territory, from South to North, and from North to<br />

South, with incursions to the West and back again. It is doubtful whether even Paul was such a<br />

suffering traveler. But one idea possessed him: to be the prime mover of the <strong>Methodist</strong> machinery,<br />

spurred by the conviction that Methodism and the salvation of souls were synonyms. He could not<br />

consent to be chief among equals, even in the Episcopacy, until physical prostration so increased that<br />

he literally dropped in his tracks.<br />

It has been discovered how the project at the General Conference, of electing another Bishop in<br />

view of Asbury's fast-failing health, was estopped by the accepted offer of Coke to remain in<br />

America and act as Bishop, a plan in which Asbury concurred, to forestall the election of another,<br />

though Coke remained in the country but four months afterward, embarking from Charleston, S. C.,<br />

[1]<br />

apparently without Asbury's consent, so that for many months he was left alone. He struggled,<br />

under burning fever and dropsical symptoms, northward, to meet, if possible, the Wilbraham<br />

Conference in Massachusetts, September 19. At New Rochelle, N.Y., he utterly broke down, and<br />

wrote a letter to Jesse Lee, appointing him to preside at the Conference. The next day, however, he<br />

was again on his way, but had to return. There were some strong men now laboring in New England,<br />

Enoch Mudge, Jesse Stoneman, Philip Wager, Joseph Michell, Evan Rodgers, Joshua Hall, Joshua<br />

Wells, Shadrack Bostwell, Michael Coate, Peter Jayne, William Thacher, Lorenzo Dow, the last still<br />

refused admission to the Conference, and Jesse Lee, the corypheus of them all. For the hard soil of<br />

[2]<br />

New England they had met with phenomenal success. It was Asbury's opportunity to advance his<br />

own plan for Episcopal support and in a letter to the Conference he proposed the appointment of<br />

Jesse Lee, Richard Whatcoat, and Francis Poythress as "assistant bishops." Asbury knew what he<br />

meant, and his meaning was plain enough. He was to be chief, not among equals, but among<br />

assistants. He did not consent to be chief among equals until the election, in 1800, of Whatcoat as<br />

Bishop. He was domiciled with the Sherwood family, who showed him much kindness and nursed<br />

him back to traveling health, though that was not much. On the day before the Conference at<br />

Wilbraham he writes "I feel strength of faith and body, as if I should be raised up again. I rode for<br />

recreation, nine miles. The clouds are dispelling from my mind. . . . I wished to speak a poor African<br />

whom I saw in a field as I went by. . . . Oh, it was going into the Egypt of South Carolina after those<br />

poor souls of Africans I have lost my health, if not my life in the end. The will of the Lord be done!"<br />

Again from his retreat, while the Conference was in session, September 23: "I received a letter from<br />

Dr. Coke; . . . it is a doubt if the Doctor cometh to America until spring, if at all until the General<br />

Conference. I am more than ever convinced of the propriety of the attempts I have made to bring<br />

forward Episcopal men: first, from the uncertain state of my health; secondly, from a regard to the<br />

union and good order of the American body, and the state of the European connection. I am sensibly<br />

assured the Americans ought to act as if they expected to lose me every day, and had no dependence<br />

on Dr. Coke; taking prudent care not to place themselves at all under the controlling influence of<br />

British <strong>Methodist</strong>s." Why his apprehension of the influence of the British brethren? Was it because<br />

liberal sentiments were prevailing and liberal concessions being made, despite the reactionary efforts<br />

of Coke, Moore, Pawson, Clarke, and others who acted together? Let a better reason be assigned,<br />

if possible.<br />

Before noticing the action of the Wilbraham Conference on the Bishop's suggestion for three<br />

Assistants, it may be well to furnish a proof that this was but a revived idea of Asbury's. As early as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!