21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esult of our rejecting the government which others had adopted; I would observe that only a<br />

minority had received it at the time." There is no escaping the logical cogency of these forceful<br />

words. Again, as in the case of the Fluvanna brethren, the bit was between his teeth. Before Asbury<br />

left them O'Kelly reports that the young ministers said to him, "What shall we do, and what will<br />

become of this district?" Asbury answered, "If you will agree that I shall be your bishop, I will<br />

station you in this district on the old plan. They accepted his offer, and the district was committed<br />

[2]<br />

to their care: but no regard was paid to O'Kelly." When the minutes were printed, however,<br />

Asbury's vehement displeasure had subsided, and O'Kelly was recognized as presiding elder and the<br />

preachers of his district named as usual.<br />

Asbury in his Journal notes upon the first Council says, "All our business was done in love and<br />

unanimity." It was the surface indication. Under arbitrary systems absence is construed as giving<br />

consent. As dissent is neither courted nor allowed, it seldom exhibits. It was early in January, 1790,<br />

that Asbury received the letter O'Kelly had written him as already found, and quotation is given of<br />

what he says in his Journal, confirming the statements of O'Kelly, and in proof of his general<br />

reliability, though not always fully informed and at times biased by his prejudices. "I received a letter<br />

from the presiding elder of this district, James O'Kelly: he makes heavy complaints of my power,<br />

and bids me stop for one year, or he must use his influence against me. Power! power! there is not<br />

a vote given in a conference in which the presiding elder has not greatly the advantage of me; all the<br />

influence I am to gain over a company of young men in a district must be done in three weeks; the<br />

greater part of them, perhaps, are seen by me only at conference, whilst the presiding elder has had<br />

them with him all the year, and has the greatest opportunity of gaining influence; this advantage may<br />

be abused; let the bishops look to it: but who has the power to lay an embargo on me, and to make<br />

[3]<br />

of non-effect the decision of all the conferences of the union?" This deliverance deserves analysis,<br />

for the philosophical reflections it suggests and for matter of fact correction. It shows how the<br />

autocratic mind frames its excuses. He keeps out of sight the fact that the presiding elder is<br />

absolutely the creature of his will, and that every preacher under him is on the point of his pen for<br />

assignment. O'Kelly did not attempt to make of "non-effect the decision of all the conferences of the<br />

union." But three of the twelve had been held when O'Kelly made his protests at Petersburg and was<br />

sustained by the preachers. What is particularly noteworthy is this, "This advantage may be abused;<br />

let the bishops look to it." He took care to do so, by making the next Council more unamenable than<br />

the first.<br />

The minutes of 1789 were famous not only for the transactions already noted, but for the record<br />

— "Philadelphia, John Dickins, Book steward." He was born and it seems well educated in the city<br />

of London, came to America before the Revolution, and about 1774 was converted and entered upon<br />

an active ministerial career in 1777. In 1778-79 he shared the leadership of Methodism with Gatch,<br />

and was easily the best debater, as is evident from showings already made of his successful<br />

controversial bout with Asbury, in defense of the action of the Fluvanna brethren in forming a<br />

Presbytery and ordaining the preachers, as well as in laying the superstructure of a Presbyterian<br />

polity for the <strong>Methodist</strong> societies while Asbury was in duress in Delaware in 1777-78 and part of<br />

1779. What considerations afterward induced him to change his mind is open to conjecture. What<br />

is known is that in 1780 he had some throat trouble and spoke with difficulty. He came under the<br />

more direct influence of Asbury, who sent him to Philadelphia, where he once more entered upon<br />

active work, and initiated the book business, exhibiting ability in the management of temporalities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!