History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

een made to burn the college." He is down in Virginia, in North Carolina, and in Charleston, S. C. He was expecting to meet Dr. Coke, as it was found when the thread of history disclosed his departure for Charleston from Barbados. He held the Conference and rode out into the country. "We were out of bread at P____'s, and we found our own stores of use. We had to send one of our weary horses eight miles to fetch the flour from the mill. Thursday, February 26 — Rode to Bruten's and enjoyed uncommon happiness in God. Some time in the night Dr. Coke came in. He had landed in Charleston about three hours after I left the city; the next day he and myself both spoke at Ridgell's." They traveled and preached together until they reached Grant's in Georgia, where the first Conference for the year was held March 9, 1789. Asbury names an important item of business: "On Thursday we appointed a committee to procure five hundred acres of ground for the establishment of a school in the state of Georgia. Conference being ended, we directed our hasty steps back to Charleston. . . . Sunday, 15th — We reached the city, having ridden about two hundred miles in about five days and two hours. Here I received a "bitter pill" from one of my greatest friends. "Praise the Lord for my trials also — may they all be sanctified!" The italics are his own. A new paragraph is needed for an answer to the question, What was this bitter pill he received? Preliminary, C. S. Nutter, to whom the Church is indebted for reprints of a number of the earliest Minutes and Disciplines, says in a preface to that of 1788, the changes of which are noted in the last chapter, "All efforts to find a copy of the third edition of the discipline, that of 1787, have failed; it is, however, contained in this edition." Then, after giving internal evidence of its truth, he says, "From these data we infer that the edition of 1787 was nearly, if not exactly, the same as this [that of 1788], to the end of the thirty-first section." It of course included the historical changes as to the origin of the Church Asbury introduced, as well as the substitution of the term bishop for superintendent. The Minutes and the Discipline had no doubt reached Wesley some time during the last half of 1787 or the first half of 1788. It is not supposable that Asbury sent them to him — their personal relations at this particular period were far from amicable, and the assumptions they contained he must have known would be disapproved by Wesley; but he had correspondents enough in America, and some of them not in accord with Asbury's methods, to furnish the printed and the unprinted doings in America. Speculation as to his reflections on reading them are here indulged. Dr. Coke must also have received the Minutes and the Discipline, but whether synchronously, or whether they had opportunity of conferring over them, cannot be affirmed. Coke remained in England about a year, or from July, 1787, to August, 1788. Next to Coke, Henry Moore seems to have shared quite fully the confidence of Wesley in these years, and therefore he knew his mind as to these transactions, if any one did. Happily he has furnished some proof of it. He says: "A letter now before me, and which he (Wesley) wrote when I was with him, will clearly show how much he felt that deviation from the simplicity which is in Christ, in those whom he much loved. It was written to Mr. Asbury, and is dated London, September 20, 1788. After speaking of some general subjects, he adds: There is, indeed, a wide difference between the relation wherein you stand to the Americans and the relation wherein I stand to all the Methodists. You are the elder brother of the American Methodists I am under God the father of the whole family. Therefore, I naturally care for you all in a manner no other person can do. Therefore, I in a measure provide for you all; for the supplies which Dr. Coke provides for you, he could not provide were it not for me — were it not that I not only permit him to collect, but support him in so doing.

But in one point, my dear brother, I am a little afraid both the doctor and you differ from me. I study to be little, you study to be great. I creep; you strut along. I found a school; you a college. Nay, and call it after your own names Oh, beware! Do not seek to be something! Let me be nothing, and Christ be all in all. One instance of this your greatness has given me great concern. How can you, how dare you, suffer yourself to be called a bishop? I shudder, I start at the very thought. Men may call me a knave, or a fool, a rascal, a scoundrel, and I am content; but they shall never by my consent call me a bishop! For my sake, for God's sake, for Christ's sake, put a full end to this! Let the Presbyterians do what they please, but let the Methodists know their calling better. Thus, my dear Franky, I have told you all that is in my heart; and let this, when I am no more seen, bear witness how sincerely I am your affectionate friend and brother, John Wesley. [1] When did Asbury receive this letter? McCaine, referring to the note in Asbury's Journal already quoted, makes the "Query. Could this bitter pill be the above letter?" A little investigation will make it morally certain. The letter is dated September 20, 1788. Remembering that ship communication with America at this date was not only uncertain, but few and far between, it is not unreasonable to assume that a month intervened before it was posted by ship. Allow a voyage of six weeks, about the average time, to America, and it did not reach New York, or Philadelphia, before the close of November. Now comes its transmission by the slow passenger mail and the slower horseback pouch in the Southern states; the delays of redirection at the several distributing offices as the postal service sent it in search of Asbury, whose particular whereabouts was by no means certain, and three months and a half is not an over-allowance for the distance from, say New York to Charleston, S. C., where it was finally addressed to him, for it was known that he would attend the Charleston Conference set for the 12th of March, 1789. Asbury acknowledged the receipt of the "bitter pill," March 15, 1789. Collaterally, when he heard of the decease of Wesley, two years afterward, he made note in his Journal among phrases of highest compliment, "For myself, notwithstanding my long absence from Mr. Wesley, and a few unpleasant expressions in some of his letters written to me (occasioned by the misrepresentations of others), I feel the stroke most sensibly," etc. Moore takes immediate occasion to correct this impression of Asbury's, "Mr. Asbury was, however, mistaken when he supposed that Mr. Wesley was influenced by the misrepresentations of others; and not by the facts stated, when he wrote those letters." And on whatever other letters Moore had his mind, it is clear that he included this one of September 20, 1788, and so far forth it stands as an acknowledgment by Asbury that it had been received; but it is the only one he ever made, and that was covert, as is seen. Too much importance cannot be attached to this letter, despite the futile attempt of Dr. Emory in 1827-30 to minify it, to be noticed later, and of other annalists to the same purpose by sparse citation of it, or suppression of it altogether from their Wesleyan histories and monographs, so that no excuse need be made for a searching investigation into it. And it is well to start with the fact that its genuineness has never been doubted, much less denied. How did Moore come into its possession? He says he was present when Wesley wrote it. Did he act as amanuensis and make the copy for Wesley? It was Wesley's habit to preserve copies of all

een made to burn the college." He is down in Virginia, in North Carolina, and in Charleston, S. C.<br />

He was expecting to meet Dr. Coke, as it was found when the thread of history disclosed his<br />

departure for Charleston from Barbados. He held the Conference and rode out into the country. "We<br />

were out of bread at P____'s, and we found our own stores of use. We had to send one of our weary<br />

horses eight miles to fetch the flour from the mill. Thursday, February 26 — Rode to Bruten's and<br />

enjoyed uncommon happiness in God. Some time in the night Dr. Coke came in. He had landed in<br />

Charleston about three hours after I left the city; the next day he and myself both spoke at Ridgell's."<br />

They traveled and preached together until they reached Grant's in Georgia, where the first<br />

Conference for the year was held March 9, 1789. Asbury names an important item of business: "On<br />

Thursday we appointed a committee to procure five hundred acres of ground for the establishment<br />

of a school in the state of Georgia. Conference being ended, we directed our hasty steps back to<br />

Charleston. . . . Sunday, 15th — We reached the city, having ridden about two hundred miles in<br />

about five days and two hours. Here I received a "bitter pill" from one of my greatest friends. "Praise<br />

the Lord for my trials also — may they all be sanctified!" The italics are his own.<br />

A new paragraph is needed for an answer to the question, What was this bitter pill he received?<br />

Preliminary, C. S. Nutter, to whom the Church is indebted for reprints of a number of the earliest<br />

Minutes and Disciplines, says in a preface to that of 1788, the changes of which are noted in the last<br />

chapter, "All efforts to find a copy of the third edition of the discipline, that of 1787, have failed; it<br />

is, however, contained in this edition." Then, after giving internal evidence of its truth, he says,<br />

"From these data we infer that the edition of 1787 was nearly, if not exactly, the same as this [that<br />

of 1788], to the end of the thirty-first section." It of course included the historical changes as to the<br />

origin of the Church Asbury introduced, as well as the substitution of the term bishop for<br />

superintendent. The Minutes and the Discipline had no doubt reached Wesley some time during the<br />

last half of 1787 or the first half of 1788. It is not supposable that Asbury sent them to him — their<br />

personal relations at this particular period were far from amicable, and the assumptions they<br />

contained he must have known would be disapproved by Wesley; but he had correspondents enough<br />

in America, and some of them not in accord with Asbury's methods, to furnish the printed and the<br />

unprinted doings in America. Speculation as to his reflections on reading them are here indulged.<br />

Dr. Coke must also have received the Minutes and the Discipline, but whether synchronously, or<br />

whether they had opportunity of conferring over them, cannot be affirmed. Coke remained in<br />

England about a year, or from July, 1787, to August, 1788. Next to Coke, Henry Moore seems to<br />

have shared quite fully the confidence of Wesley in these years, and therefore he knew his mind as<br />

to these transactions, if any one did. Happily he has furnished some proof of it. He says: "A letter<br />

now before me, and which he (Wesley) wrote when I was with him, will clearly show how much he<br />

felt that deviation from the simplicity which is in Christ, in those whom he much loved. It was<br />

written to Mr. Asbury, and is dated London, September 20, 1788. After speaking of some general<br />

subjects, he adds:<br />

There is, indeed, a wide difference between the relation wherein you stand to the Americans and<br />

the relation wherein I stand to all the <strong>Methodist</strong>s. You are the elder brother of the American<br />

<strong>Methodist</strong>s I am under God the father of the whole family. Therefore, I naturally care for you all in<br />

a manner no other person can do. Therefore, I in a measure provide for you all; for the supplies<br />

which Dr. Coke provides for you, he could not provide were it not for me — were it not that I not<br />

only permit him to collect, but support him in so doing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!