History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

all the Elders, who were directed to take the oversight of several circuits, were set to the right hand of a bracket, which enclosed all the circuits and preachers of which he was to take charge. This may be considered as the beginning of the presiding elder's office; although it was not known by that name at that time: yet in the absence of a Superintendent, this elder had the direction of all the preachers that were enclosed in the bracket against which his name was set." Briareus must have a hundred hands to keep in secret touch with the humblest preacher, and yet swing away from him while making the circuit of a continent. Besides these causes of distraction, it is in evidence that the English missionaries of Wesley, prior to 1780, kept on harrowing Asbury at home. Dr. Coke opened correspondence with some of the American preachers, for Lee says that, among the complaints urged against Dr. Coke at the Conference of 1787, was one for "writing improper letters to some of our preachers, such as were calculated to stir up strife and contention among them." James O'Kelly in the South was discussing the situation and strengthening himself for a tussle with Asbury, who was not idle in circumventing his unfriendly critics, while he kept himself in sympathy with a number of the leading preachers, and the wonderful charm of his personal presence sufficed to overawe the less influential. And all this was poured into Wesley's ear, preparing him for the decisive steps he took, as will be seen, to constrain Asbury to uncover, and through the American Conference either adhere to their Christmas Conference resolve of fealty to him; or do as they did, repudiate his authority and seat Asbury untrammeled on the Episcopal throne. All these causes combined probably had their depressing influence, so that while in some sections there were gracious revivals, the numerical increase fell below the previous average largely. Beverly Allen was among the notable preachers of this period, but died an apostate. He had great success in Charleston, S. C., and elsewhere. Henry Willis is a name fragrant with spiritual memories in the early work, as well as John Hagerty, who labored much in New Jersey. Thomas Morrell had been a revolutionary officer, and was converted under Hagerty, who led him forth to the ministry, which he afterward adorned. His name is conspicuous in the controversy with Hammett, to be noticed briefly later. He lived to his ninetieth year, not dying until August 9, 1838. Robert Cloud was also a colaborer with Morrell and widely useful. There was not a little controversy mingled with the preaching, as Universalists and Calvinists had to be confronted and confuted by these homespun, but brainy men of Methodist renown. The doctrine of the Trinity and the Godhead of Christ were subjects largely traversed. Garrettson's labors have already been noticed. Watters was a prince in Israel and left his mark in many places. Jesse Lee rapidly grew in favor. Of stalwart figure, hard common sense, and as much culture as his environment allowed, he was a preacher of power, and bore down all obstructions before him; not in the South only, his native heath, but in the North, and among the educated communities, he planted Methodism. James O'Kelly, in his chosen field of North Carolina and eastern Virginia, swayed a great influence for his quick wit, strong understanding, fervid piety, which Asbury often felt and noted; but, cast in the mold of Strawbridge, he was independent, self-willed, and as a presiding elder made himself felt and feared by his subordinates. Asbury vainly endeavored to control him, and contrary to precedent left him in this high office for ten successive years in the same territory, but it availed nothing to his subordination, but contributed to the confidence he gathered that he was able to cope with Asbury. Presently he will be seen wrestling with him on a vital question with the ill-timed and disastrous secession he led in 1792-93.

The missionary propagandists must not be overlooked at least for embalmment in memory. Jeremiah Lambert had labored in Antigua, but, health failing, he returned to America and was actively employed in the South until 1786, when he peacefully departed. James Haw and Benjamin Ogburn volunteered for Kentucky, then the outpost of civilization. Williamson, a young man, soon joined them. And in passing it must be observed that, in most of the dangerous and laborious work of early Methodism, the pioneers who blazed the forests and kindled camp-fires on mountain and prairie were volunteers, so that what is attributed to the Episcopal system, as such in sending them, needs to be discounted to this degree, and the fact is elicited that it was the consuming zeal of regenerated men with the love of God in their hearts that impelled them, and this motive would have existed and been operative under a more liberal polity as well. John Tunnell and Thomas Ware were leaders in Tennessee. Space would fail to enlarge upon the equally arduous and successful labors of Foster, Ellis, Ivy, Bruce, Poythress, Cox, Chew, Matson, Reed, Owens, and Boyer. Whatcoat piously pursued his quiet way. Vasey sulked under Asbury, not finding his appointment by Wesley to America what he thought it ought to be. Ezekiel Cooper, next to Garrettson and coeval with Snethen became a Reformer in after days. Gill and Pigman and Forrest and Hartley. These all lived and died in the faith. For brief and reliable memoirs of most of them see Atkinson's "Centennial History of American Methodism," the most impartial and truthful view of early American Methodism yet published by a minister of the Methodist Episcopal Church. The Conference year of 1756 was eventful for its great revivals in various sections of the country, so that, by the Conference of May 1, 1757, Lee says, there was a net gain of 8592, the whole being about 25,000 members. Ten new circuits were taken in and thirty-four young preachers received. There were now sixty-five circuits and 131 traveling preachers. Asbury unremittingly continued his travels and labors over a wide circuit. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia were compassed up to the close of December. He was ill in New York, and says, "Spent some time in looking over my journal, which I have kept for fifteen years back. Some things I corrected and some I expunged. Perhaps, if they are not published before, they will be after, my death, to let my friends and the world know how I have employed my time in America." February, he is in North Carolina, and is on horseback, for in no other way could he make progress over the bad roads. Early in March he is in South Carolina making for Charleston. On the 15th he writes, "Preached at the new church at S____'s here I heard that Dr. Coke was in Charleston: . . . we arrived in Charleston and met Dr. Coke." It must not be inferred that Asbury had no knowledge of his coming from England; Coke had no doubt written to him from the West Indies and other preachers, but it is singularly coincident in the seeming that, as Coke did not reach Charleston with Hammett until about the 1st of March, Asbury should have made his way down there and they met a few weeks afterward. It will be remembered that Coke came with orders from Wesley to convene all the preachers in Baltimore, May 1, 1787, and also to ordain Whatcoat a Superintendent of the American Methodists. It is impossible to tell whether either Wesley or Coke had communicated his commands by other conveyance than the ship that was to have landed Coke and company in Nova Scotia, but was driven to the West Indies. It does not seem probable, for the official information came to Asbury after this Charleston meeting of the "joint superintendents" for America. March 25, Asbury writes, "We held our conference in this city," by which he must simply mean that Coke, Willis, Lee, and possibly any one else of the preachers within hail had an interchange of opinions; indeed, two days after he records, "We exchanged sentiments on matters freely." On the 29th, "Our conference ended." It

all the Elders, who were directed to take the oversight of several circuits, were set to the right hand<br />

of a bracket, which enclosed all the circuits and preachers of which he was to take charge. This may<br />

be considered as the beginning of the presiding elder's office; although it was not known by that<br />

name at that time: yet in the absence of a Superintendent, this elder had the direction of all the<br />

preachers that were enclosed in the bracket against which his name was set." Briareus must have a<br />

hundred hands to keep in secret touch with the humblest preacher, and yet swing away from him<br />

while making the circuit of a continent. Besides these causes of distraction, it is in evidence that the<br />

English missionaries of Wesley, prior to 1780, kept on harrowing Asbury at home. Dr. Coke opened<br />

correspondence with some of the American preachers, for Lee says that, among the complaints urged<br />

against Dr. Coke at the Conference of 1787, was one for "writing improper letters to some of our<br />

preachers, such as were calculated to stir up strife and contention among them." James O'Kelly in<br />

the South was discussing the situation and strengthening himself for a tussle with Asbury, who was<br />

not idle in circumventing his unfriendly critics, while he kept himself in sympathy with a number<br />

of the leading preachers, and the wonderful charm of his personal presence sufficed to overawe the<br />

less influential. And all this was poured into Wesley's ear, preparing him for the decisive steps he<br />

took, as will be seen, to constrain Asbury to uncover, and through the American Conference either<br />

adhere to their Christmas Conference resolve of fealty to him; or do as they did, repudiate his<br />

authority and seat Asbury untrammeled on the Episcopal throne. All these causes combined probably<br />

had their depressing influence, so that while in some sections there were gracious revivals, the<br />

numerical increase fell below the previous average largely.<br />

Beverly Allen was among the notable preachers of this period, but died an apostate. He had great<br />

success in Charleston, S. C., and elsewhere. Henry Willis is a name fragrant with spiritual memories<br />

in the early work, as well as John Hagerty, who labored much in New Jersey. Thomas Morrell had<br />

been a revolutionary officer, and was converted under Hagerty, who led him forth to the ministry,<br />

which he afterward adorned. His name is conspicuous in the controversy with Hammett, to be<br />

noticed briefly later. He lived to his ninetieth year, not dying until August 9, 1838. Robert Cloud was<br />

also a colaborer with Morrell and widely useful. There was not a little controversy mingled with the<br />

preaching, as Universalists and Calvinists had to be confronted and confuted by these homespun, but<br />

brainy men of <strong>Methodist</strong> renown. The doctrine of the Trinity and the Godhead of Christ were<br />

subjects largely traversed. Garrettson's labors have already been noticed. Watters was a prince in<br />

Israel and left his mark in many places. Jesse Lee rapidly grew in favor. <strong>Of</strong> stalwart figure, hard<br />

common sense, and as much culture as his environment allowed, he was a preacher of power, and<br />

bore down all obstructions before him; not in the South only, his native heath, but in the North, and<br />

among the educated communities, he planted Methodism. James O'Kelly, in his chosen field of<br />

North Carolina and eastern Virginia, swayed a great influence for his quick wit, strong<br />

understanding, fervid piety, which Asbury often felt and noted; but, cast in the mold of Strawbridge,<br />

he was independent, self-willed, and as a presiding elder made himself felt and feared by his<br />

subordinates. Asbury vainly endeavored to control him, and contrary to precedent left him in this<br />

high office for ten successive years in the same territory, but it availed nothing to his subordination,<br />

but contributed to the confidence he gathered that he was able to cope with Asbury. Presently he will<br />

be seen wrestling with him on a vital question with the ill-timed and disastrous secession he led in<br />

1792-93.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!