History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhouse, M.D., D.D. Volume I CHAPTER 26 The tripartite contention of Wesley, Coke, and Asbury, for the supremacy — Burning of Cokesbury College, with moralizings — The system of Asbury operative — Wesley calls through Coke a General Conference for 1787; how the news reached Asbury: how he met it; and how he circumvented both Wesley and Coke; the former's name left off the minutes, and the latter compelled to abdicate his Episcopal powers; the incidents dramatic; Whatcoat rejected as a superintendent; how it was brought about; Asbury pulling the wires — Fatal error of the preachers in 1784 — The true contention of this History; proceedings of 1784 "questionable and unwarrantable" — Examination of character; hero preachers of this day. An ecclesiastical chessboard, figuratively speaking, lies before you. The illustration is employed because nothing else is so apt. Wesley, the guileless and ingenuous, under the delusion of the Christmas Conference resolve, to obey him in all matters of church government, is looking on as the mentor, and at times directing the moves. Coke is the strategist, now consulting Wesley with much obeisance, and now conferring with Asbury; but, mistrustful, he ventures to slide out his pawns with an eye ultimately to win the game for himself. Asbury, conscious that he is securely master of the situation, also looks on complacently, deferential to Wesley and watchful of Coke, with every new move of either or both he plays a hand soft as velvet, and astonishes Coke and sets Wesley to thinking, for he manages to turn every combination into a checkmate. It is the tripartite contention mentioned in the opening chapter of this History, and is now being disclosed. Three conscientious men, as each was, controlled by his educational convictions, are striving for the mastery, that they may the better glorify God and save souls. Wesley, greater than any bishop, brushes aside from his onward path musty traditions. A king, he makes another king, but never intended that he should be greater than his maker. Coke, ambitious of the high-sounding title as any child of plume and sword, accepts the minified thing, but never forgets, and loses no opportunity to make gold of the glitter, — a real successional apostolical bishop. Asbury, when proffered it, kneels for the coronation, but, like another Napoleon, he sets the crown upon his own head. History affords no more interesting study of human nature than these three. But for the time it shall be incidental only to the spiritual work of these twenty months. It is much more congenial to portray these chief actors and their helpers as gospel preachers than as church politicians. It will be remembered that after the rise of the Christmas Conference Asbury started upon his first official tour, reaching Charleston as its terminus, having Willis and Lee with him. They opened preaching in an abandoned Baptist church, and met with great success, Lee preaching the first Methodist sermon, though Pilmoor had held service there on passing through the city. It was left in charge of Willis, and this is the work Coke and Hammett found on their arrival twenty months after. Asbury returned to Maryland and bid adieu to Coke, June 2, 1785, in Baltimore. On the 5th of June, 1785, he laid the foundation of Cokesbury College at Abingdon, Md. Strickland, his biographer, says: "Attired in his long silk gown, and with his flowing bands, the pioneer bishop of America took his position on the walls of the college" and preached the sermon. When finished the college was 105
feet in length and 40 feet in breadth, located on the summit of six acres of land. It had, when in operation, a regular college curriculum and was well officered. It continued in fairly successful operation until December 7, 1795, when it was destroyed by fire, of probable incendiary origin. Asbury was in Charleston, S. C., at the time, and makes record: "We have now a second and confirmed account that Cokesbury College is consumed to ashes, a sacrifice of about 10,000 in about ten years. If any man should give me 10,000 per year to do and suffer again what I have done for that house I would not do it. The Lord called not Mr. Whitefield nor the Methodists to build colleges. I wished only for schools — Dr. Coke wanted a college. I feel distressed at the loss of the library." In this Asbury does not exhibit either his usual prescience or wisdom. Can it be that a man of his volitional temperament was fretted as much that the collapsed institution was not his own creation as the absolute loss materially? It was monumental, however, as a preintimation, both of the liberality of the laity and the colossal character of the future educational plants of the newly organized Church. Millions have since been contributed for buildings and endowments. [1] Leaving the corner-stone ceremonies he enters upon his travels, through Maryland, up into Pennsylvania, New Jersey, down the Eastern Shore of Maryland, back to Baltimore, on to Annapolis; buys a "wagon" to ride in; exchanges it for a second-hand sulky; pushes on; sick several times with his old complaint, the quinsy; exposed to all kinds of weather; down into Virginia; undertakes a revision of the Discipline — it is not to his liking; gets to Winston, N. C.; takes to horseback again as he cannot get on with the sulky; and turns his head homeward, if Baltimore and Harry Gough's can be called home to a man who was always moving and had but little patience with preachers who were not always moving also. "April 15, 1786 — Read our form of Discipline in manuscript which brother Dickins has been preparing for the press." Arrived in Baltimore on the 26th; employs himself "inspecting the accounts of the Book Concern." "Monday, May 8, our Conference began at Abingdon, where love, candor, and precision marked our deliberations." That is all of it. He makes no mention whatever of the Conferences appointed at Salisbury, N. C., February 21, and at Lane's chapel, Virginia, April 10. The preachers in all that section were watched and discounted in the matter of church legislation. What they did, if not confirmed by the Baltimore Conference, was null and void. What Baltimore did was referred to them, and they were expected to acquiesce. Asbury's personal influence with the Baltimore preachers was paramount — he could depend upon them to register his will. Jesse Lee says that the North Carolina and Virginia Conferences were held at the times appointed. The minutes from 1786 to 1787 were titled "Minutes of the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church." Those of 1786 furnish but little information. It may be well to note that the initial question is, "Who are the Superintendents of our church? Answer, Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury." The number of members is 15,791, with 1890 blacks. The previous year 18,000 were reported in round numbers without discrimination of color. Conferences were ordered for North Carolina, May 17, 1787, Virginia, June 19, and Abingdon, Md., July 24. Thus it will be seen that the net increase was less than eight hundred for 1785-86. There must have been an adequate cause for it. The old doctrines had lost none of their saving power. There are not wanting hints that the minds of the preachers were distracted by the new Church order. They saw the Episcopal bud, a very innocent thing it seemed to be at the Christmas Conference, bloom out into full flower under Asbury, the Sunday Service, the canonicals donned by the leading preachers, and the presiding Eldership virtually introduced from 1755. Lee says — "The form of the minutes was changed this year, and
- Page 199 and 200: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 201 and 202: on so new a plan, he afterward susp
- Page 203 and 204: of it are in the closing suggestion
- Page 205 and 206: employing the terms "superintendent
- Page 207 and 208: to be a mere formality, likely to r
- Page 209 and 210: If any one will point out a more ra
- Page 211 and 212: monotony, the "Pastorals" of Virgil
- Page 213 and 214: ace, Eclipse is first, and that put
- Page 215 and 216: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 217 and 218: next day, Sabbath, he reached, with
- Page 219 and 220: esumed his labors, and died in Phil
- Page 221 and 222: [6] is the material point. There is
- Page 223 and 224: emarkable when it is considered tha
- Page 225 and 226: our societies in the United States,
- Page 227 and 228: eady to break with Wesley at any op
- Page 229 and 230: ENDNOTES 1 The reader is apprised t
- Page 231 and 232: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 233 and 234: minutes as printed. To that portion
- Page 235 and 236: steps taken by Mr. Wesley and mysel
- Page 237 and 238: een involuntary, wrested by the ove
- Page 239 and 240: 6 Bangs' "History," Vol. I. pp. 165
- Page 241 and 242: see Asbury open a Methodist meeting
- Page 243 and 244: obliged to acknowledge that I acted
- Page 245 and 246: intimates the desire they had of my
- Page 247 and 248: under present circumstances, to gra
- Page 249: ENDNOTES 1 Dr. Scudder, in his "Ame
- Page 253 and 254: The missionary propagandists must n
- Page 255 and 256: interference was no doubt well know
- Page 257 and 258: it ? Wesley, when he received the a
- Page 259 and 260: 9; at Holstein, May 13; at Amelia,
- Page 261 and 262: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 263 and 264: will determine sufficient in a man
- Page 265 and 266: crosses the mountains — "the firs
- Page 267 and 268: The preachers having had great diff
- Page 269 and 270: Eleven Conferences were appointed f
- Page 271 and 272: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 273 and 274: But in one point, my dear brother,
- Page 275 and 276: The letter itself now calls for ana
- Page 277 and 278: continued to this day in the Method
- Page 279 and 280: his testimony. Some writer during t
- Page 281 and 282: it. Besides, even allowing that Cok
- Page 283 and 284: 1 "Life of Wesley," Vol. II. pp. 25
- Page 285 and 286: segregation complained of, is inten
- Page 287 and 288: Now cull from O'Kelly's "Apology" s
- Page 289 and 290: In his pastoral relation he raised
- Page 291 and 292: Council, is proving too much for ev
- Page 293 and 294: Even so partisan a writer as Rev. D
- Page 295 and 296: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 297 and 298: of his name in 1786, the fact that
- Page 299 and 300: change of environment enables them
feet in length and 40 feet in breadth, located on the summit of six acres of land. It had, when in<br />
operation, a regular college curriculum and was well officered. It continued in fairly successful<br />
operation until December 7, 1795, when it was destroyed by fire, of probable incendiary origin.<br />
Asbury was in Charleston, S. C., at the time, and makes record: "We have now a second and<br />
confirmed account that Cokesbury College is consumed to ashes, a sacrifice of about 10,000 in about<br />
ten years. If any man should give me 10,000 per year to do and suffer again what I have done for that<br />
house I would not do it. The Lord called not Mr. Whitefield nor the <strong>Methodist</strong>s to build colleges. I<br />
wished only for schools — Dr. Coke wanted a college. I feel distressed at the loss of the library." In<br />
this Asbury does not exhibit either his usual prescience or wisdom. Can it be that a man of his<br />
volitional temperament was fretted as much that the collapsed institution was not his own creation<br />
as the absolute loss materially? It was monumental, however, as a preintimation, both of the<br />
liberality of the laity and the colossal character of the future educational plants of the newly<br />
organized Church. Millions have since been contributed for buildings and endowments. [1]<br />
Leaving the corner-stone ceremonies he enters upon his travels, through Maryland, up into<br />
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, down the Eastern Shore of Maryland, back to Baltimore, on to Annapolis;<br />
buys a "wagon" to ride in; exchanges it for a second-hand sulky; pushes on; sick several times with<br />
his old complaint, the quinsy; exposed to all kinds of weather; down into Virginia; undertakes a<br />
revision of the Discipline — it is not to his liking; gets to Winston, N. C.; takes to horseback again<br />
as he cannot get on with the sulky; and turns his head homeward, if Baltimore and Harry Gough's<br />
can be called home to a man who was always moving and had but little patience with preachers who<br />
were not always moving also. "April 15, 1786 — Read our form of Discipline in manuscript which<br />
brother Dickins has been preparing for the press." Arrived in Baltimore on the 26th; employs himself<br />
"inspecting the accounts of the Book Concern." "Monday, May 8, our Conference began at<br />
Abingdon, where love, candor, and precision marked our deliberations." That is all of it. He makes<br />
no mention whatever of the Conferences appointed at Salisbury, N. C., February 21, and at Lane's<br />
chapel, Virginia, April 10. The preachers in all that section were watched and discounted in the<br />
matter of church legislation. What they did, if not confirmed by the Baltimore Conference, was null<br />
and void. What Baltimore did was referred to them, and they were expected to acquiesce. Asbury's<br />
personal influence with the Baltimore preachers was paramount — he could depend upon them to<br />
register his will. Jesse Lee says that the North Carolina and Virginia Conferences were held at the<br />
times appointed.<br />
The minutes from 1786 to 1787 were titled "Minutes of the General Conference of the <strong>Methodist</strong><br />
Episcopal Church." Those of 1786 furnish but little information. It may be well to note that the initial<br />
question is, "Who are the Superintendents of our church? Answer, Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury."<br />
The number of members is 15,791, with 1890 blacks. The previous year 18,000 were reported in<br />
round numbers without discrimination of color. Conferences were ordered for North Carolina, May<br />
17, 1787, Virginia, June 19, and Abingdon, Md., July 24. Thus it will be seen that the net increase<br />
was less than eight hundred for 1785-86. There must have been an adequate cause for it. The old<br />
doctrines had lost none of their saving power. There are not wanting hints that the minds of the<br />
preachers were distracted by the new Church order. They saw the Episcopal bud, a very innocent<br />
thing it seemed to be at the Christmas Conference, bloom out into full flower under Asbury, the<br />
Sunday Service, the canonicals donned by the leading preachers, and the presiding Eldership<br />
virtually introduced from 1755. Lee says — "The form of the minutes was changed this year, and