History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhouse, M.D., D.D. Volume I CHAPTER 26 The tripartite contention of Wesley, Coke, and Asbury, for the supremacy — Burning of Cokesbury College, with moralizings — The system of Asbury operative — Wesley calls through Coke a General Conference for 1787; how the news reached Asbury: how he met it; and how he circumvented both Wesley and Coke; the former's name left off the minutes, and the latter compelled to abdicate his Episcopal powers; the incidents dramatic; Whatcoat rejected as a superintendent; how it was brought about; Asbury pulling the wires — Fatal error of the preachers in 1784 — The true contention of this History; proceedings of 1784 "questionable and unwarrantable" — Examination of character; hero preachers of this day. An ecclesiastical chessboard, figuratively speaking, lies before you. The illustration is employed because nothing else is so apt. Wesley, the guileless and ingenuous, under the delusion of the Christmas Conference resolve, to obey him in all matters of church government, is looking on as the mentor, and at times directing the moves. Coke is the strategist, now consulting Wesley with much obeisance, and now conferring with Asbury; but, mistrustful, he ventures to slide out his pawns with an eye ultimately to win the game for himself. Asbury, conscious that he is securely master of the situation, also looks on complacently, deferential to Wesley and watchful of Coke, with every new move of either or both he plays a hand soft as velvet, and astonishes Coke and sets Wesley to thinking, for he manages to turn every combination into a checkmate. It is the tripartite contention mentioned in the opening chapter of this History, and is now being disclosed. Three conscientious men, as each was, controlled by his educational convictions, are striving for the mastery, that they may the better glorify God and save souls. Wesley, greater than any bishop, brushes aside from his onward path musty traditions. A king, he makes another king, but never intended that he should be greater than his maker. Coke, ambitious of the high-sounding title as any child of plume and sword, accepts the minified thing, but never forgets, and loses no opportunity to make gold of the glitter, — a real successional apostolical bishop. Asbury, when proffered it, kneels for the coronation, but, like another Napoleon, he sets the crown upon his own head. History affords no more interesting study of human nature than these three. But for the time it shall be incidental only to the spiritual work of these twenty months. It is much more congenial to portray these chief actors and their helpers as gospel preachers than as church politicians. It will be remembered that after the rise of the Christmas Conference Asbury started upon his first official tour, reaching Charleston as its terminus, having Willis and Lee with him. They opened preaching in an abandoned Baptist church, and met with great success, Lee preaching the first Methodist sermon, though Pilmoor had held service there on passing through the city. It was left in charge of Willis, and this is the work Coke and Hammett found on their arrival twenty months after. Asbury returned to Maryland and bid adieu to Coke, June 2, 1785, in Baltimore. On the 5th of June, 1785, he laid the foundation of Cokesbury College at Abingdon, Md. Strickland, his biographer, says: "Attired in his long silk gown, and with his flowing bands, the pioneer bishop of America took his position on the walls of the college" and preached the sermon. When finished the college was 105

feet in length and 40 feet in breadth, located on the summit of six acres of land. It had, when in operation, a regular college curriculum and was well officered. It continued in fairly successful operation until December 7, 1795, when it was destroyed by fire, of probable incendiary origin. Asbury was in Charleston, S. C., at the time, and makes record: "We have now a second and confirmed account that Cokesbury College is consumed to ashes, a sacrifice of about 10,000 in about ten years. If any man should give me 10,000 per year to do and suffer again what I have done for that house I would not do it. The Lord called not Mr. Whitefield nor the Methodists to build colleges. I wished only for schools — Dr. Coke wanted a college. I feel distressed at the loss of the library." In this Asbury does not exhibit either his usual prescience or wisdom. Can it be that a man of his volitional temperament was fretted as much that the collapsed institution was not his own creation as the absolute loss materially? It was monumental, however, as a preintimation, both of the liberality of the laity and the colossal character of the future educational plants of the newly organized Church. Millions have since been contributed for buildings and endowments. [1] Leaving the corner-stone ceremonies he enters upon his travels, through Maryland, up into Pennsylvania, New Jersey, down the Eastern Shore of Maryland, back to Baltimore, on to Annapolis; buys a "wagon" to ride in; exchanges it for a second-hand sulky; pushes on; sick several times with his old complaint, the quinsy; exposed to all kinds of weather; down into Virginia; undertakes a revision of the Discipline — it is not to his liking; gets to Winston, N. C.; takes to horseback again as he cannot get on with the sulky; and turns his head homeward, if Baltimore and Harry Gough's can be called home to a man who was always moving and had but little patience with preachers who were not always moving also. "April 15, 1786 — Read our form of Discipline in manuscript which brother Dickins has been preparing for the press." Arrived in Baltimore on the 26th; employs himself "inspecting the accounts of the Book Concern." "Monday, May 8, our Conference began at Abingdon, where love, candor, and precision marked our deliberations." That is all of it. He makes no mention whatever of the Conferences appointed at Salisbury, N. C., February 21, and at Lane's chapel, Virginia, April 10. The preachers in all that section were watched and discounted in the matter of church legislation. What they did, if not confirmed by the Baltimore Conference, was null and void. What Baltimore did was referred to them, and they were expected to acquiesce. Asbury's personal influence with the Baltimore preachers was paramount — he could depend upon them to register his will. Jesse Lee says that the North Carolina and Virginia Conferences were held at the times appointed. The minutes from 1786 to 1787 were titled "Minutes of the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church." Those of 1786 furnish but little information. It may be well to note that the initial question is, "Who are the Superintendents of our church? Answer, Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury." The number of members is 15,791, with 1890 blacks. The previous year 18,000 were reported in round numbers without discrimination of color. Conferences were ordered for North Carolina, May 17, 1787, Virginia, June 19, and Abingdon, Md., July 24. Thus it will be seen that the net increase was less than eight hundred for 1785-86. There must have been an adequate cause for it. The old doctrines had lost none of their saving power. There are not wanting hints that the minds of the preachers were distracted by the new Church order. They saw the Episcopal bud, a very innocent thing it seemed to be at the Christmas Conference, bloom out into full flower under Asbury, the Sunday Service, the canonicals donned by the leading preachers, and the presiding Eldership virtually introduced from 1755. Lee says — "The form of the minutes was changed this year, and

feet in length and 40 feet in breadth, located on the summit of six acres of land. It had, when in<br />

operation, a regular college curriculum and was well officered. It continued in fairly successful<br />

operation until December 7, 1795, when it was destroyed by fire, of probable incendiary origin.<br />

Asbury was in Charleston, S. C., at the time, and makes record: "We have now a second and<br />

confirmed account that Cokesbury College is consumed to ashes, a sacrifice of about 10,000 in about<br />

ten years. If any man should give me 10,000 per year to do and suffer again what I have done for that<br />

house I would not do it. The Lord called not Mr. Whitefield nor the <strong>Methodist</strong>s to build colleges. I<br />

wished only for schools — Dr. Coke wanted a college. I feel distressed at the loss of the library." In<br />

this Asbury does not exhibit either his usual prescience or wisdom. Can it be that a man of his<br />

volitional temperament was fretted as much that the collapsed institution was not his own creation<br />

as the absolute loss materially? It was monumental, however, as a preintimation, both of the<br />

liberality of the laity and the colossal character of the future educational plants of the newly<br />

organized Church. Millions have since been contributed for buildings and endowments. [1]<br />

Leaving the corner-stone ceremonies he enters upon his travels, through Maryland, up into<br />

Pennsylvania, New Jersey, down the Eastern Shore of Maryland, back to Baltimore, on to Annapolis;<br />

buys a "wagon" to ride in; exchanges it for a second-hand sulky; pushes on; sick several times with<br />

his old complaint, the quinsy; exposed to all kinds of weather; down into Virginia; undertakes a<br />

revision of the Discipline — it is not to his liking; gets to Winston, N. C.; takes to horseback again<br />

as he cannot get on with the sulky; and turns his head homeward, if Baltimore and Harry Gough's<br />

can be called home to a man who was always moving and had but little patience with preachers who<br />

were not always moving also. "April 15, 1786 — Read our form of Discipline in manuscript which<br />

brother Dickins has been preparing for the press." Arrived in Baltimore on the 26th; employs himself<br />

"inspecting the accounts of the Book Concern." "Monday, May 8, our Conference began at<br />

Abingdon, where love, candor, and precision marked our deliberations." That is all of it. He makes<br />

no mention whatever of the Conferences appointed at Salisbury, N. C., February 21, and at Lane's<br />

chapel, Virginia, April 10. The preachers in all that section were watched and discounted in the<br />

matter of church legislation. What they did, if not confirmed by the Baltimore Conference, was null<br />

and void. What Baltimore did was referred to them, and they were expected to acquiesce. Asbury's<br />

personal influence with the Baltimore preachers was paramount — he could depend upon them to<br />

register his will. Jesse Lee says that the North Carolina and Virginia Conferences were held at the<br />

times appointed.<br />

The minutes from 1786 to 1787 were titled "Minutes of the General Conference of the <strong>Methodist</strong><br />

Episcopal Church." Those of 1786 furnish but little information. It may be well to note that the initial<br />

question is, "Who are the Superintendents of our church? Answer, Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury."<br />

The number of members is 15,791, with 1890 blacks. The previous year 18,000 were reported in<br />

round numbers without discrimination of color. Conferences were ordered for North Carolina, May<br />

17, 1787, Virginia, June 19, and Abingdon, Md., July 24. Thus it will be seen that the net increase<br />

was less than eight hundred for 1785-86. There must have been an adequate cause for it. The old<br />

doctrines had lost none of their saving power. There are not wanting hints that the minds of the<br />

preachers were distracted by the new Church order. They saw the Episcopal bud, a very innocent<br />

thing it seemed to be at the Christmas Conference, bloom out into full flower under Asbury, the<br />

Sunday Service, the canonicals donned by the leading preachers, and the presiding Eldership<br />

virtually introduced from 1755. Lee says — "The form of the minutes was changed this year, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!