History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
[8] acknowledged by them as the same with themselves." But to Wesley it in cant that dreaded thing, separation from him; besides, it is in farther proof how far he had modified his earliest views of [9] Episcopacy and succession. He was, as found, a veritable Presbyterian, though clinging to the last to the Church home of his father and his childhood. Asbury was certainly aware of Seabury's [10] ordination in Scotland and of his return about the time of the Christmas Conference; but had not Wesley sent Coke over, it would no more have suited Asbury than it did Wesley, and for a similar reason: it would have deprived him of the Primacy over American preachers and people, even if he had been recognized on application to Seabury as a Bishop. It would have made him a simple diocesan instead of a continental Primate. But to Wesley's circular letter. As reflecting his change of views as to Episcopacy, in his fourth reason he speaks of the National Church as "the English hierarchy." Nowhere else in all his writings does he so designate it. It is not so spoken of by Episcopalians. It is a Romish coinage and carries with it all that is offensive ideally of priestly rule. If he would not dare to entangle them again with it, it may be assumed that he was not enamored of it himself. "They are now at full liberty to follow the Scriptures and the primitive church." For the honor and unity of American Methodism one cannot forbear the wish, Would that they had! In the interval of the British Conference of 1784 and the departure of Coke and his associates for America, Wesley employed such leisure as he could command in editing the Book of Common Prayer. It was used in most of the Methodist chapels, but needed some emendations for America. This amended book is very rare, but the M. B. Book Concern in New York has recently reissued it and a copy is consulted. The original title was: "The Sunday Service of the Methodists in North America, with other occasional services. London, printed in the year MDCCLXXXIV." The original preface to it is republished with the edition of 1893. In it Wesley says," Little alteration is made in the following edition (which I recommend to our societies in America) except," etc. The holy days are omitted, the Lord's Day service abridged, some sentences in the office of Baptism and the Burial of the Dead omitted, for their Romish and water-regenerating drift, as well as some of the imprecatory Psalms, etc. Stevens says it also contained forms for "ordaining superintendents, elders, and deacons, the Articles of Religion, and a Collection of Psalms and Hymns." The late American edition does not conform to this, and altogether is an accommodational reprint. It was brought over by Coke in the sheets, probably for the portable advantage. There is no intimation by any one how large the edition was, but it is fairly presumable that it was enough for the wants of the societies, now numbering fifteen thousand members, should they adopt it. Wesley's obvious purpose was to conform the American societies more fully to the Wesleyan model under his authority, but with not so much as a dream of a Church, or else he would have enjoined it instead of modestly recommending it. Simple and indisputable as was the object, it is made to play an important part in the controversy of 1827-30, as shall be shown. Thus accoutered, Dr. Coke and his associates, Whatcoat and Vasey, set sail from Bristol at ten o'clock on the morning of the 18th of September, 1784. He is possessed of his credentials as a superintendent, the little sketch, the circular letter addressed to the societies, and the Sunday Service, besides his luggage, including the canonicals, in which, like Wesley and other clergymen, he always officiated, with his books and papers. The vessel was bound for New York. After a tempestuous voyage of six weeks they reached their destination, November 3. He spent his time as a godly man should, in reading and prayer. The life of Xavier, the Catholic missionary, occupied him, as well as Hoadley on "Conformity and Episcopacy," and Augustine's "Meditations," and, to relieve the
monotony, the "Pastorals" of Virgil, and, above all, his Greek New Testament. Disembarking, the three were met and conducted to the house of Stephen Sands, a member and trustee of the John Street chapel. John Dickins, the city preacher, was introduced, and as he was book agent and a leading preacher, Coke disclosed to him, Stevens says, "the scheme which he brought from Wesley. Dickins, being one of the Fluvanna brethren, emphatically approved it; and requested that it might at once be announced to the public, assured that it would be received with joy. Coke deemed it expedient to disclose it no further till he could consult Asbury." Stevens gleaned this information probably from Coke's Journal, which Hampson cites to the effect that he opened Wesley's plan to a preacher in New York (Dickins it was), that he highly approved it, and, Coke adds, "he pressed me earnestly to make it public, because, as he justly observed, Mr. Wesley had determined the point, and therefore it was not to be investigated, but complied with." W. S. Stockton, the father of lay-representation in America among laymen, in the Methodist Protestant of December 28, 1844, points out that this "plan" could be no other than the "little sketch," and no one can doubt it. It is initial of the Christmas Conference business, and for its further full analysis a new chapter is demanded. *************************************
- Page 159 and 160: y Methodists as a constant prayerfu
- Page 161 and 162: the episcopal form of church govern
- Page 163 and 164: 1784, and he had regular work. He r
- Page 165 and 166: of our national independence, who b
- Page 167 and 168: strength of Methodism was in Maryla
- Page 169 and 170: 1 Lee's "History," p.56. ENDNOTES 2
- Page 171 and 172: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 173 and 174: and their children, and they procee
- Page 175 and 176: to men whose opinions disagreed wit
- Page 177 and 178: Why do the printed Minutes take no
- Page 179 and 180: ENDNOTES 1 Stevens says, "During th
- Page 181 and 182: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 183 and 184: of our divisions; it was transcribe
- Page 185 and 186: Mr. Wesley generally held a Confere
- Page 187 and 188: under the necessity of abiding by i
- Page 189 and 190: the Methodists. At twenty years of
- Page 191 and 192: HISTORY OF METHODIST REFORM Synopti
- Page 193 and 194: His references to the Conference of
- Page 195 and 196: landly said, 'He is hard on us.' As
- Page 197 and 198: and good sense so far predominated
- Page 199 and 200: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 201 and 202: on so new a plan, he afterward susp
- Page 203 and 204: of it are in the closing suggestion
- Page 205 and 206: employing the terms "superintendent
- Page 207 and 208: to be a mere formality, likely to r
- Page 209: If any one will point out a more ra
- Page 213 and 214: ace, Eclipse is first, and that put
- Page 215 and 216: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 217 and 218: next day, Sabbath, he reached, with
- Page 219 and 220: esumed his labors, and died in Phil
- Page 221 and 222: [6] is the material point. There is
- Page 223 and 224: emarkable when it is considered tha
- Page 225 and 226: our societies in the United States,
- Page 227 and 228: eady to break with Wesley at any op
- Page 229 and 230: ENDNOTES 1 The reader is apprised t
- Page 231 and 232: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 233 and 234: minutes as printed. To that portion
- Page 235 and 236: steps taken by Mr. Wesley and mysel
- Page 237 and 238: een involuntary, wrested by the ove
- Page 239 and 240: 6 Bangs' "History," Vol. I. pp. 165
- Page 241 and 242: see Asbury open a Methodist meeting
- Page 243 and 244: obliged to acknowledge that I acted
- Page 245 and 246: intimates the desire they had of my
- Page 247 and 248: under present circumstances, to gra
- Page 249 and 250: ENDNOTES 1 Dr. Scudder, in his "Ame
- Page 251 and 252: feet in length and 40 feet in bread
- Page 253 and 254: The missionary propagandists must n
- Page 255 and 256: interference was no doubt well know
- Page 257 and 258: it ? Wesley, when he received the a
- Page 259 and 260: 9; at Holstein, May 13; at Amelia,
monotony, the "Pastorals" of Virgil, and, above all, his Greek New Testament. Disembarking, the<br />
three were met and conducted to the house of Stephen Sands, a member and trustee of the John<br />
Street chapel. John Dickins, the city preacher, was introduced, and as he was book agent and a<br />
leading preacher, Coke disclosed to him, Stevens says, "the scheme which he brought from Wesley.<br />
Dickins, being one of the Fluvanna brethren, emphatically approved it; and requested that it might<br />
at once be announced to the public, assured that it would be received with joy. Coke deemed it<br />
expedient to disclose it no further till he could consult Asbury." Stevens gleaned this information<br />
probably from Coke's Journal, which Hampson cites to the effect that he opened Wesley's plan to<br />
a preacher in New York (Dickins it was), that he highly approved it, and, Coke adds, "he pressed me<br />
earnestly to make it public, because, as he justly observed, Mr. Wesley had determined the point, and<br />
therefore it was not to be investigated, but complied with." W. S. Stockton, the father of<br />
lay-representation in America among laymen, in the <strong>Methodist</strong> Protestant of December 28, 1844,<br />
points out that this "plan" could be no other than the "little sketch," and no one can doubt it. It is<br />
initial of the Christmas Conference business, and for its further full analysis a new chapter is<br />
demanded.<br />
*************************************