21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sense of the ministry, of the King James translators of the Scriptures, giving to these episcopi the title<br />

of bishops. In fact, he had become a Presbyterian while he remained in form an Episcopalian.<br />

It was not a new opinion. Forty years before, Lord King's account of the primitive Church<br />

convinced him "that bishops and presbyters are of one order"; in 1756 he wrote, "I still believe the<br />

Episcopal form of church government to agree with the practice and writings of the apostles" (and<br />

he explained this farther by declaring that he believed the Established Church of England the "best<br />

form for a National Church," and anent this there will be little dissent by any one); "but that it is<br />

prescribed in scripture, I do not believe." Again, in 1761, he said that Stillingfleet had convinced him<br />

that to believe that none but episcopal ordination was valid "was an entire mistake." And finally, in<br />

1780, prior to his actually setting apart as a presbyter, he startled his brother Charles by declaring,<br />

"I verily believe I have as good a right to ordain as to administer the Lord's Supper." After the<br />

collocation of these deliverances, the position taken that, ecclesiastically, he was a Presbyterian and<br />

not an Episcopalian seems established beyond successful contradiction. It sweeps away a great mass<br />

of cobweb spinning and fruitless logomachy of three grades of an episcopacy as proven from the<br />

Fathers in order to transfigure the simple ceremony over Coke in that private chamber into anything<br />

but an assignment of Coke by Wesley to be a superintendent with authority to confer the same office,<br />

not order, upon Asbury in America, into something else. The only excuse at all for a ceremony is<br />

found in the specious reasons urged by Coke, and the more potent fact that Wesley was the father<br />

and founder of the <strong>Methodist</strong>s, and as such had a priority and an authority that may be easily<br />

conceded him.<br />

The general view thus presented has been the traditional view of leading Wesleyan ministers, with<br />

marked exceptions, and that upon which their own Presbyterian polity is based; and it has been the<br />

declared view in logical sequence of the leading ministers of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Episcopal Church of<br />

America from the period when the case of Bishop Andrews was made a crucial one in 1844, the<br />

action of that General Conference pronouncing that the bishopric in that Church is an office and not<br />

an order, to pave the way for the position it assumed that he could resign or they could suspend him<br />

to accomplish the purpose then in hand. True, there have been eminent dissenters since, revamping<br />

the old position that Coke and Asbury and their successors were in some sense and in some grade<br />

a third order, as well as officers in the Church they represent, a position more generally adhered to<br />

in the <strong>Methodist</strong> Episcopal Church, South. Tyerman, who may be accepted as a criterion of English<br />

Wesleyan sentiment, thus defines it: "What was the ordination to be? The only one possible was this.<br />

Wesley was the venerable father of the 15,000 <strong>Methodist</strong>s in America. He was not able to visit them<br />

himself, but sends them Dr. Coke. The doctor pretends that it is more than possible that some of the<br />

American preachers and societies will refuse to acknowledge his authority. To remove this objection,<br />

Wesley, at Bristol, in a private room, holds a religious service, puts his hands upon the head of Coke,<br />

and (to use his own words) sets him apart as a superintendent of the work in America, and gives him<br />

a written testimonial to that effect. This was all that Wesley did, and all that Wesley meant; but we<br />

greatly doubt whether it was all that the departing envoy wished. With the highest respect for Dr.<br />

Coke and his general excellencies, it is no detraction to assert that he was dangerously ambitious,<br />

and that the height of his ambition was a desire to be a bishop. . . . These are unpleasant facts; which<br />

we would rather have consigned to oblivion, had they not been necessary to vindicate Wesley from<br />

the huge inconsistency of ordaining a coequal presbyter to be a bishop. Wesley meant the ceremony

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!