21.07.2013 Views

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eader. It is premonitory of another action. To it the twenty-four, inclusive of Asbury, responded<br />

affirmatively, not by voting, let it be underscored, but not dissenting; Asbury records the result. Five<br />

were admitted into connection and are counted among the twenty-four. "Shall we continue in close<br />

connection with the Church, and press our people to a closer communion with her? Yes. Will this<br />

Conference grant the privilege to all the friendly clergy of the Church of England, at the request or<br />

desire of the people, to preach or administer the ordinances in our preaching-houses or chapels?<br />

Yes." This introduced a new custom and practice made Episcopalians of the societies. "Ought not<br />

this Conference to require those preachers who hold slaves to give promises to set them free? Yes.<br />

Does this Conference acknowledge that slavery is contrary to the laws of God, man, and nature, and<br />

hurtful to society; contrary to the dictates of conscience and pure religion, and doing that which we<br />

would not others should do to us and ours? Do we pass our disapprobation on all our friends who<br />

keep slaves, and advise their freedom? Yes." The measure was drastic. Jesse Lee says, "The<br />

preachers in this case went too far in their censures." The resolves fell into desuetude; but it is<br />

interesting to note with Stevens, "Methodism thus early recorded its protest against Negro slavery,<br />

anticipating its abolition in Massachusetts by three years; in Rhode Island and Connecticut by four<br />

years; the thesis of Clarkson before the University of Cambridge by five years; and the ordinance of<br />

Congress against it in the Northwestern Territory by seven years." "Does this whole Conference<br />

disapprove the steps our brethren have taken in Virginia? Yes. Do we look upon them no longer as<br />

<strong>Methodist</strong>s in connection with Mr. Wesley and us until they come back? Agreed. What must be the<br />

condition of our union with our Virginia brethren? To suspend all their administrations for one year,<br />

and all meet together in Baltimore."<br />

Thus virtual excommunication was passed by the minority upon the majority; the seceders expel<br />

the regular Conference and all their adherents! Asbury saw it was a case of life or death for him, and<br />

he administered heroic treatment. He had not yet heard from Wesley, so that these high-handed<br />

proceedings were on his own responsibility, and there never was an exigency to which he did not<br />

prove himself equal; his iron will bore down all before it. The utter ignoring of the regular<br />

Conference found its climax in another query: "What shall the Conference do in case of brother<br />

Asbury's death or absence? Meet once a year, and act according to the minutes." It was just what the<br />

regular Conference was doing. A faction reconstitute Asbury General Assistant without authorization<br />

from Wesley, who alone could appoint, expel the regular Conference and three-fifths of the<br />

membership, and coolly declare that they are "no longer <strong>Methodist</strong>s in connection with Mr. Wesley!"<br />

"Shall brothers Asbury, Garrettson, and Watters attend the Virginia Conference and inform them of<br />

our proceedings in this, and receive their answer? Yes." Watters says that Gatch and Ellis of the<br />

Virginia brethren were present as spectators of these memorable transactions in the Baltimore<br />

Conference. He acted as mediator between the parties, and while in sympathy with the regular<br />

Conference, was willing to almost any terms that would save a final rupture. The printed Minutes<br />

contain the plan of appointments of Asbury, but there is not the slightest reference to the<br />

Manakintown regular Conference, except, without acknowledgment of their source, the plan of<br />

appointments for Virginia and North Carolina is inserted. By it twenty preachers are stationed. The<br />

statistics are given for the whole connection. Membership, 8504, showing a loss of 73. This, in<br />

contrast with the gain of 1500 the previous year, cannot be accounted for on the ground solely of the<br />

war draft and other such hindrances, but must include the disaffection and falling away of members<br />

when the preachers fell out among themselves.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!