History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
women on the roll. A Home missionary society was organized, and the work much enlarged under it. The second Conference was held at Baddash in 1820. There were six ordained ministers, nineteen on trial, and nineteen women, making a total of forty-four. There were seventeen circuits. The third Conference was held at Shebbear, in Lake chapel, in August, 1820. An Annuitant Society was formed, whose capital fund is now 4212. It is for the superannuated and their families. A connectional magazine was established in 1822. It is now a sixty-four page monthly. In 1822 a mission was opened in London and in the Channel islands. In 1831 a missionary was sent to Canada. In 1850 two were sent to South Australia; in 1855 one to Victoria; in 1866 a mission was opened in Queensland, and in 1877 in New Zealand. In 1885 two missionaries were sent to China, which have been increased to eight. It is therefore a truly missionary Church, thus showing its credentials as of Christ. In 1883 their Canada Conference of 71 ministers, local preachers, 181 chapels with 6918 members, and their Sabbath-schools, went into the union of Methodisms. Its statistics for 1891 are: 271 ministers, 1899 local preachers, 1011 chapels, halls, and rooms, with a membership of 30,000. Its polity is liberal, and, on the question of women preaching, radical. These facts are gleaned from the paper of Rev. William Higman, President of the Conference, in the symposium of the New York Independent for 1891, the centenary of Wesley's decease. The United Methodist Free Churches now demand attention. They embody the most recent and numerous secessions from the Wesleyan body with their own increase under a prosperity that scouts the idea that a favoring Providence is on the side of Wesley's paternal polity as embodied in the Poll-Deed and the Wesleyan Conference. The Union was formed in 1857 between the Associated Methodists of 1835, whose history was left incomplete in the notice of their organization under the lead of Dr. Warren; the Wesleyan Reformers of 1849; the Protestant Methodists originating in the Leeds organ question, and the last secession resulting from the expulsion of Rev. James Everett, Samuel Dunn, and William Griffith, with the sequel of the loss of one hundred thousand officers and members to the Wesleyan connection. These sections, or branches of Methodism, finding that their principles of church government and administration were identical, after friendly negotiations, met by representation in the town of Rochdale, Lancashire, and in July, 1857, the Union was consummated, and for more than thirty years it has worked with undisputed satisfaction to all the contracting parties. It is under an Annual Assembly. Its constitution is found in a legal instrument called the "Foundation Deed." The Annual Assembly is purely elective, and that directly from the quarterly meetings of the circuits. The ratio is one to every circuit having under 500 members, two for every 500 and under 1000, and three for every 1000 members and upward. No qualification is required for election but membership in the circuit, and no distinction is made between ministers and laymen, and there is nothing to bar the eligibility of a woman, if elected. The Assembly has four ex-officio members, the President, the Connectional and Corresponding Secretaries, and the Treasurer, who form the connecting link between the Annual Assemblies. A Connectional Committee has charge of the interests of the denomination during the interval of the Assemblies. The ministry is connectional, and in principle itinerant, but without a restrictive rule as to limit of pastoral service. Its ministry is also under the absolute control of the Annual Assembly. It controls all the connectional institutions and funds. "The fundamental principles of the body are circuit independence and free election to the Annual Assembly, which, however, has no authority
to interfere with the internal affairs of the circuits or to make laws for their guidance. The district meetings have no judicial or legislative functions, but are the medium of communication between the circuits and the Assembly." The circuit strength of the denomination lies principally in the mining and manufacturing counties of England; it has also large interests in the agricultural provinces. Lately attention has been given to London. In the earlier years of the Union its resources were taxed to depletion in building chapels and consolidating itself, a factor in all these secedent branches, of which too much account cannot be taken in comparative estimates. Then it took up Home and Foreign missions, and collections must be taken up for them under penalty of forfeiture of membership in the Assembly. Its foreign missions are in Jamaica, West and East Africa, China, Australia, and New Zealand. The income for the Mission Fund is 12,000. They are prosecuted at great expense and martyr devotion from its young preachers. The denomination has a publishing house in London which issues its connectional literature. The profits are distributed among the connectional funds. A new congregational hymn-book was published in 1890. A Relief Fund for indigent chapels and a London Chapel Fund are among its creations. In 1877 a college was opened at Harrogate, Yorkshire, for the education of ministers and for commercial life. It has other funds in common with the Methodisms, special attention being given to its "Temperance League." Its statistics are as follows: 417 ministers, 1608 chapels and preaching-places, with a roll of 85,461 members. There are also 3341 local preachers, 3889 class leaders, 1367 Sunday-schools, 26,689 teachers, and 203,883 scholars. The value of church property is about 2,037,384. "Such is Free Methodism as at present organized and administered. It constitutes the fairest and fullest opportunity ever given in Great Britain for testing the problem, whether the peculiar genius of Methodism can be successfully worked on purely democratic principles. At present Free Methodism is robust and vigorous." It is proper for a better understanding of the origin of the Free Methodists that notice in more detail should be taken of the expulsion of Messrs. Griffith, Everett, and Dunn at the Manchester Conference, August 3, 1849. Several years before suspicion was aroused among not a few of the prominent ministers and laymen of the Wesleyan body that the management of the temporalities of the denomination, specially in the Mission House, was not as careful and judicious as might be, and under the reasonable checks which business affairs always demand. The proceedings had been conducted after the genius of paternalism, with a degree of secrecy deemed impolitic by those who wished the conduct of affairs to be above suspicion. It will be remembered that even the proceedings of the Wesleyan Conference itself were still conducted with closed doors, as had been the fashion from Wesley's day, and as to the internal management through committees and secretaries little was ever disclosed except in the annual reports. Inquiries were met with brusque answers, only serving to heighten the suspicion of the wide-awake investigators. Finding themselves thwarted at every turn, they began to issue anonymous circulars and pamphlets, which were widely distributed and extensively read, thereby arousing the connection and bringing the subject-matter to the immediate attention of the laity. Great excitement was created by the accusations on the one hand and the denials on the other, the controversy waxing warmer as it became acrimonious and personal. All the efforts of the Conference authorities proved abortive in discovering the authors of the circulars, which came to be called "Fly-sheets," those engaged in the work proving themselves as capable of keeping a secret as those managing the close corporation concerns of the Conference in the Mission House, etc. A Mr. Osburn was designated by the Conference to ferret out the authors, and with much
- Page 85 and 86: short, and the design itself was sp
- Page 87 and 88: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 89 and 90: week of Wesley's death he wrote: "M
- Page 91 and 92: stewards, the admission and expulsi
- Page 93 and 94: wrote like a mountain torrent. Stro
- Page 95 and 96: present purpose reads: "But when on
- Page 97 and 98: y the calendar, must be used wherev
- Page 99 and 100: presidency the Conference would not
- Page 101 and 102: 1 Asbury's " Journal," Vol. II. p.1
- Page 103 and 104: HISTORY OF METHODIST REFORM Synopti
- Page 105 and 106: Commentary is an imperishable monum
- Page 107 and 108: parent bodies will the mission of t
- Page 109 and 110: ENDNOTES 1 She was a Friend, but he
- Page 111 and 112: constantly devising new plans for i
- Page 113 and 114: urst out, and one Daniel Shubetham
- Page 115 and 116: insulted the representatives of the
- Page 117 and 118: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 119 and 120: courtesy due him, was thought too p
- Page 121 and 122: like Wesley, betrayed his ignorance
- Page 123 and 124: delicate woman, died and was buried
- Page 125 and 126: 1 "History of Methodism," Vol. III.
- Page 127 and 128: The respective theories are working
- Page 129 and 130: or usages which had been most assai
- Page 131 and 132: the ministry, its devotion and libe
- Page 133 and 134: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 135: It is necessary to retrace steps to
- Page 139 and 140: showed, in feasting at high dinners
- Page 141 and 142: ENDNOTE 1 The plan has since been a
- Page 143 and 144: into evil ways. Barbara Heck kept a
- Page 145 and 146: which was the vogue of a large numb
- Page 147 and 148: attended the ministry of both, conv
- Page 149 and 150: thing which I seek, a circulation o
- Page 151 and 152: ENDNOTES 1 Bangs' "History of the M
- Page 153 and 154: 13 Atkinson's "Methodism in America
- Page 155 and 156: Philadelphia, George Shadford (to c
- Page 157 and 158: Lednum has preserved the name of Jo
- Page 159 and 160: y Methodists as a constant prayerfu
- Page 161 and 162: the episcopal form of church govern
- Page 163 and 164: 1784, and he had regular work. He r
- Page 165 and 166: of our national independence, who b
- Page 167 and 168: strength of Methodism was in Maryla
- Page 169 and 170: 1 Lee's "History," p.56. ENDNOTES 2
- Page 171 and 172: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 173 and 174: and their children, and they procee
- Page 175 and 176: to men whose opinions disagreed wit
- Page 177 and 178: Why do the printed Minutes take no
- Page 179 and 180: ENDNOTES 1 Stevens says, "During th
- Page 181 and 182: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 183 and 184: of our divisions; it was transcribe
- Page 185 and 186: Mr. Wesley generally held a Confere
to interfere with the internal affairs of the circuits or to make laws for their guidance. The district<br />
meetings have no judicial or legislative functions, but are the medium of communication between<br />
the circuits and the Assembly." The circuit strength of the denomination lies principally in the<br />
mining and manufacturing counties of England; it has also large interests in the agricultural<br />
provinces. Lately attention has been given to London.<br />
In the earlier years of the Union its resources were taxed to depletion in building chapels and<br />
consolidating itself, a factor in all these secedent branches, of which too much account cannot be<br />
taken in comparative estimates. Then it took up Home and Foreign missions, and collections must<br />
be taken up for them under penalty of forfeiture of membership in the Assembly. Its foreign missions<br />
are in Jamaica, West and East Africa, China, Australia, and New Zealand. The income for the<br />
Mission Fund is 12,000. They are prosecuted at great expense and martyr devotion from its young<br />
preachers. The denomination has a publishing house in London which issues its connectional<br />
literature. The profits are distributed among the connectional funds. A new congregational<br />
hymn-book was published in 1890. A Relief Fund for indigent chapels and a London Chapel Fund<br />
are among its creations. In 1877 a college was opened at Harrogate, Yorkshire, for the education of<br />
ministers and for commercial life. It has other funds in common with the Methodisms, special<br />
attention being given to its "Temperance League." Its statistics are as follows: 417 ministers, 1608<br />
chapels and preaching-places, with a roll of 85,461 members. There are also 3341 local preachers,<br />
3889 class leaders, 1367 Sunday-schools, 26,689 teachers, and 203,883 scholars. The value of<br />
church property is about 2,037,384. "Such is Free Methodism as at present organized and<br />
administered. It constitutes the fairest and fullest opportunity ever given in Great Britain for testing<br />
the problem, whether the peculiar genius of Methodism can be successfully worked on purely<br />
democratic principles. At present Free Methodism is robust and vigorous."<br />
It is proper for a better understanding of the origin of the Free <strong>Methodist</strong>s that notice in more<br />
detail should be taken of the expulsion of Messrs. Griffith, Everett, and Dunn at the Manchester<br />
Conference, August 3, 1849. Several years before suspicion was aroused among not a few of the<br />
prominent ministers and laymen of the Wesleyan body that the management of the temporalities of<br />
the denomination, specially in the Mission House, was not as careful and judicious as might be, and<br />
under the reasonable checks which business affairs always demand. The proceedings had been<br />
conducted after the genius of paternalism, with a degree of secrecy deemed impolitic by those who<br />
wished the conduct of affairs to be above suspicion. It will be remembered that even the proceedings<br />
of the Wesleyan Conference itself were still conducted with closed doors, as had been the fashion<br />
from Wesley's day, and as to the internal management through committees and secretaries little was<br />
ever disclosed except in the annual reports. Inquiries were met with brusque answers, only serving<br />
to heighten the suspicion of the wide-awake investigators. Finding themselves thwarted at every turn,<br />
they began to issue anonymous circulars and pamphlets, which were widely distributed and<br />
extensively read, thereby arousing the connection and bringing the subject-matter to the immediate<br />
attention of the laity. Great excitement was created by the accusations on the one hand and the<br />
denials on the other, the controversy waxing warmer as it became acrimonious and personal. All the<br />
efforts of the Conference authorities proved abortive in discovering the authors of the circulars,<br />
which came to be called "Fly-sheets," those engaged in the work proving themselves as capable of<br />
keeping a secret as those managing the close corporation concerns of the Conference in the Mission<br />
House, etc. A Mr. Osburn was designated by the Conference to ferret out the authors, and with much