History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
ank. Samuel Hick and William Carvosso also departed, leaving testimony to the saving power of the faith they taught and exemplified. The Centenary of Methodism was celebrated both in England and America with appropriate ceremonies and excusable exultation over the marvelous spread of a heart-religion on both continents. A layman, Butterworth, had suggested the commemoration. An imposing assembly met at Manchester, 1838, comprising about 250 preachers and laymen. It was resolved to raise 80,000 as a centenary offering. The actual sum raised was 216,000. In October, 1839, the Methodist world united in the celebration. Nothing like it for munificent giving was ever before known in a denomination. Wesley died at the head of 550 itinerants and 140,000 members in all quarters of the globe. A half century later these had grown to an army of 6080 itinerant preachers and four times as many local preachers, and 1,400,000 members, including the various bodies claiming to be Methodists. It had about 350 foreign missionaries, and about 3000 unpaid assistants, occupying some 300 stations. Perronet wrote years before Wesley's death, "I make no doubt that Methodism is designed by Providence to introduce the approaching millennium." Wesley caught its true spirit some twelve years before his death, regarding it not as a sect, or as a party in dogmatic theology, but a revival of spiritual Christianity designed to uplift the Christian world and furnish a lever for the moral betterment of the ungodly masses. It is doubtful whether in after years it can be claimed as an improvement, or even as a necessity, when it became in the parent bodies of England, and specially [2] America, a pronounced sect with some exclusive pretension, and too largely intent upon denominational aggrandizement as well. Meantime most of the evangelical churches have affiliated with it more closely in the preached modification of doctrine, and particularly in experiential piety. Its career for one hundred years has been succinctly traced; fifty more are to come, within which half-time it has fulfilled the promise of its beginning by tripling its numbers, girdling the world, and searching out its hidden corners. What remains for it no one cares to anticipate, lest the realized exaggerations of the past should make incredulous the hope of the future. Nothing can better conclude these reflections than the words of Stevens as to a distinguishing peculiarity of this the greatest moral and spiritual force of modern times. "It has practically restored the primitive 'priesthood of the people,' not only by the example of its lay or local preachers, more than twice as numerous as its regular ministry, but by its exhorters, class leaders, prayer leaders, and the religious activity to which it has trained its laity generally." But how regrettable is it that this noble record is marred by the stultifying blindness of the founders of the parent bodies in England and America, the latter, it is true, but the echo of the former, in studiously and persistently excluding that priesthood of the people from all participation in its governmental structure. In the primitive Church nothing was done legislatively but by the consent of the people congregationally assembled. But antiChrist — the overslaughing of the people by the preaching class — early appeared, soon consolidated, and erected itself into a hierarchy of little and big popes. That the favored class should be enamored of it is consonant with all the exhibitions of human nature, fettered in this, if nothing else, with the selfish spirit. It has taken one hundred years of better education, restive agitation, demand and denial, with its precipitation of expulsions for opinions' sake, to awaken the old bodies to a sense of its high inexpediency, not to say its wrong. Slowly, but surely, the great reform has gone forward, and it is manifest destiny for it to continue to go forward, until Methodism, not only its protesting bodies living and thriving side by side with the parents as object-lessons and modifying forces, shall emancipate itself from a false interpretation of a laity without parallel for its loyalty to
the ministry, its devotion and liberality, its conservatism, its high average intelligence, and all the qualities that make Christian manhood a coveted patent of nobility. The words of the Apostle shall be accommodationally true in this also: "For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery (lest ye should be wise in your own conceit) that blindness in part is happened unto Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved." *************************************
- Page 79 and 80: * See Appendix to Dr. Kewley's "Inq
- Page 81 and 82: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 83 and 84: He said soon after, "I will get up,
- Page 85 and 86: short, and the design itself was sp
- Page 87 and 88: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 89 and 90: week of Wesley's death he wrote: "M
- Page 91 and 92: stewards, the admission and expulsi
- Page 93 and 94: wrote like a mountain torrent. Stro
- Page 95 and 96: present purpose reads: "But when on
- Page 97 and 98: y the calendar, must be used wherev
- Page 99 and 100: presidency the Conference would not
- Page 101 and 102: 1 Asbury's " Journal," Vol. II. p.1
- Page 103 and 104: HISTORY OF METHODIST REFORM Synopti
- Page 105 and 106: Commentary is an imperishable monum
- Page 107 and 108: parent bodies will the mission of t
- Page 109 and 110: ENDNOTES 1 She was a Friend, but he
- Page 111 and 112: constantly devising new plans for i
- Page 113 and 114: urst out, and one Daniel Shubetham
- Page 115 and 116: insulted the representatives of the
- Page 117 and 118: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 119 and 120: courtesy due him, was thought too p
- Page 121 and 122: like Wesley, betrayed his ignorance
- Page 123 and 124: delicate woman, died and was buried
- Page 125 and 126: 1 "History of Methodism," Vol. III.
- Page 127 and 128: The respective theories are working
- Page 129: or usages which had been most assai
- Page 133 and 134: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 135 and 136: It is necessary to retrace steps to
- Page 137 and 138: to interfere with the internal affa
- Page 139 and 140: showed, in feasting at high dinners
- Page 141 and 142: ENDNOTE 1 The plan has since been a
- Page 143 and 144: into evil ways. Barbara Heck kept a
- Page 145 and 146: which was the vogue of a large numb
- Page 147 and 148: attended the ministry of both, conv
- Page 149 and 150: thing which I seek, a circulation o
- Page 151 and 152: ENDNOTES 1 Bangs' "History of the M
- Page 153 and 154: 13 Atkinson's "Methodism in America
- Page 155 and 156: Philadelphia, George Shadford (to c
- Page 157 and 158: Lednum has preserved the name of Jo
- Page 159 and 160: y Methodists as a constant prayerfu
- Page 161 and 162: the episcopal form of church govern
- Page 163 and 164: 1784, and he had regular work. He r
- Page 165 and 166: of our national independence, who b
- Page 167 and 168: strength of Methodism was in Maryla
- Page 169 and 170: 1 Lee's "History," p.56. ENDNOTES 2
- Page 171 and 172: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 173 and 174: and their children, and they procee
- Page 175 and 176: to men whose opinions disagreed wit
- Page 177 and 178: Why do the printed Minutes take no
- Page 179 and 180: ENDNOTES 1 Stevens says, "During th
ank. Samuel Hick and William Carvosso also departed, leaving testimony to the saving power of<br />
the faith they taught and exemplified.<br />
The Centenary of Methodism was celebrated both in England and America with appropriate<br />
ceremonies and excusable exultation over the marvelous spread of a heart-religion on both<br />
continents. A layman, Butterworth, had suggested the commemoration. An imposing assembly met<br />
at Manchester, 1838, comprising about 250 preachers and laymen. It was resolved to raise 80,000<br />
as a centenary offering. The actual sum raised was 216,000. In October, 1839, the <strong>Methodist</strong> world<br />
united in the celebration. Nothing like it for munificent giving was ever before known in a<br />
denomination. Wesley died at the head of 550 itinerants and 140,000 members in all quarters of the<br />
globe. A half century later these had grown to an army of 6080 itinerant preachers and four times as<br />
many local preachers, and 1,400,000 members, including the various bodies claiming to be<br />
<strong>Methodist</strong>s. It had about 350 foreign missionaries, and about 3000 unpaid assistants, occupying some<br />
300 stations. Perronet wrote years before Wesley's death, "I make no doubt that Methodism is<br />
designed by Providence to introduce the approaching millennium." Wesley caught its true spirit some<br />
twelve years before his death, regarding it not as a sect, or as a party in dogmatic theology, but a<br />
revival of spiritual Christianity designed to uplift the Christian world and furnish a lever for the<br />
moral betterment of the ungodly masses. It is doubtful whether in after years it can be claimed as an<br />
improvement, or even as a necessity, when it became in the parent bodies of England, and specially<br />
[2]<br />
America, a pronounced sect with some exclusive pretension, and too largely intent upon<br />
denominational aggrandizement as well. Meantime most of the evangelical churches have affiliated<br />
with it more closely in the preached modification of doctrine, and particularly in experiential piety.<br />
Its career for one hundred years has been succinctly traced; fifty more are to come, within which<br />
half-time it has fulfilled the promise of its beginning by tripling its numbers, girdling the world, and<br />
searching out its hidden corners. What remains for it no one cares to anticipate, lest the realized<br />
exaggerations of the past should make incredulous the hope of the future.<br />
Nothing can better conclude these reflections than the words of Stevens as to a distinguishing<br />
peculiarity of this the greatest moral and spiritual force of modern times. "It has practically restored<br />
the primitive 'priesthood of the people,' not only by the example of its lay or local preachers, more<br />
than twice as numerous as its regular ministry, but by its exhorters, class leaders, prayer leaders, and<br />
the religious activity to which it has trained its laity generally." But how regrettable is it that this<br />
noble record is marred by the stultifying blindness of the founders of the parent bodies in England<br />
and America, the latter, it is true, but the echo of the former, in studiously and persistently excluding<br />
that priesthood of the people from all participation in its governmental structure. In the primitive<br />
Church nothing was done legislatively but by the consent of the people congregationally assembled.<br />
But antiChrist — the overslaughing of the people by the preaching class — early appeared, soon<br />
consolidated, and erected itself into a hierarchy of little and big popes. That the favored class should<br />
be enamored of it is consonant with all the exhibitions of human nature, fettered in this, if nothing<br />
else, with the selfish spirit. It has taken one hundred years of better education, restive agitation,<br />
demand and denial, with its precipitation of expulsions for opinions' sake, to awaken the old bodies<br />
to a sense of its high inexpediency, not to say its wrong. Slowly, but surely, the great reform has gone<br />
forward, and it is manifest destiny for it to continue to go forward, until Methodism, not only its<br />
protesting bodies living and thriving side by side with the parents as object-lessons and modifying<br />
forces, shall emancipate itself from a false interpretation of a laity without parallel for its loyalty to