History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org History Of Methodist Reform, Volume I - Media Sabda Org
METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhouse, M.D., D.D. Volume I CHAPTER 11 Heroes of early Methodism common property — Power of the Poll-Deed in quelling and preventing liberal sentiments — The noble dead of this period — Coke's letter to the Bishop of London, 1799 — Failure of the plan — Committee of Privileges of 1803 — Lay-delegation vs. lay-representation — Foreign Mission work of the Conference and Dr. Coke its exponent — Jabez Bunting and Robert Newton — Great revivals — Jonathan Seville; no other form of Christianity ever developed such characters — Prosperity of the Connection — "Providential" favor; but equally so with the Reform bodies. It will relieve the mental strain of these seven years of internal strife to turn reflection upon the bead-roll of moral heroes and spiritual giants who came into view during this eventful period. They belong alike to a common Methodism. Aside from their individual biographies, where published, the deft and graceful pen of Stevens has pictured them for the admiration of the religions world and the imitation of all who would do and dare and die for Christly service and scriptural doctrine. Limitation forbids anything but glimpses of these sainted men as they pass in review. Richard Treffry was received during this stormy period. He was an able theologian, and his standard Lives of Benson and his son and namesake, Richard, are valuable works. For near fifty years he was a devoted and successful preacher and died in the triumphs of faith. James Townley was received in 1796. He was a biblical scholar and for a number of years one of the secretaries of the Wesleyan General Missions. He was elected President of the Conference, and ranks with Benson, Clarke, and Watson. He suffered much in his last days, but overcame all through the blood of the Lamb. Richard Watson was placed on the roll also in 1796. He was morally great and intellectually gigantic. He succeeded Coke in the management of the Foreign Missions. He became one of the greatest preachers of his day, and his vigorous intellect was fruitful in his imperishable "Theological Institutes" and "Bible Dictionary." English Methodism never produced a nobler character. Richard Newton, Jabez Bunting, Daniel Isaac, and Gideon Ouseley were among those who entered upon the stage of itinerant and laborious life. The first rose to commanding eminence and the second was a conspicuous figure, often elected to the Presidency, with a magnetic, awesome presence which subdued the average preacher in Conference discussion; esteemed arbitrary, he moved a majestic councilor among his brethren and did more than any other man, despite this overbearing reputation, to bring the laity into official Conference recognition. While the Conference bloomed with this promise many of the veterans were passing away. In the seven years thirty-four obituaries are recorded. As was the custom from Wesley's time a few lines often dismissed a half-century laborer of eminent usefulness and pronounced ability. "These all died in faith." Let me link together the names of Hester Ann Rodgers, Mary Fletcher, Elizabeth Fry, [1] Sarah Crosby, Ann Cutler, and Dinah Evans, for the sisterhood of Methodism has never been a whit less noble than its brotherhood, and was honored in these days with official position, so that largely the controversy of today is but a return to ancient usage. Benson was a mighty preacher in these times, and Adam Clarke, as revivalist and writer, won a high place among his peers. His
Commentary is an imperishable monument. He was instrumental in the conversion of Joseph Butterworth, afterwards member of Parliament and the associate of Wilberforce, and enrolled with Thornton, Buxton, and Thompson as leading laymen. William Bramwell is a name known to the sacred biography of Methodism. "At one time," says Stevens, "he sympathized much with Kilham, in his projects of 'reform,' but his deep piety saved him." Comment is forborne. Extraordinary scenes attended his revivals. Samuel Hick, the "Village Blacksmith," is a memorable name in the ranks of the local preachers. His career, as depicted by Stevens and by his biographer, reads like a romance. He died in his seventy-first year in triumph, having spent more than fifty years in labor as a blacksmith and service as a Methodist preacher and exhorter. Under such auspices the United Societies increased in these seven years from 76,968 to 108,261. The itinerant ministry increased from 313 to 399, and during the same time some 20 new chapels were erected. [2] The eight Conferences from 1798 to 1806, being respectively the fifty-fifth to the sixty-third, were presided over in order by Benson, Bradburn, Wood, Pawson, Taylor, Bradford, Moore, and Coke. The excision of Kilham, the retirement of Thom and others from the Conference to join him, and the secession of five thousand members left the old Conference in a condition of acquiescence in the dominant party, the Legal Hundred and their supporters. There is no question that not a few of them were in earnest sympathy with a more liberal form of government. Indeed, so widespread was the espousal of such sentiments that, but for the Poll-Deed and its entrenchment of property power with the minority, the insistence of the advocates of liberal views and the force of their logic would have prevailed. It happened, as it always will in like controversial issues, that social ties, personal pecuniary support for dependent families, the risk involved in a system yet in theory, the recusance of the timid, and the uncertainties that loom up in such a venture quelled disaffection and, at least outwardly, tranquilized the main body of Methodists. It must also be remembered that, besides the coign of vantage enjoyed by the adherents, their convictions were quite as intense, so that any innovation on the plan of Wesley meant destruction to the itinerancy and the decay of Methodism. He had so proclaimed years before his departure. The title of all property must vest in the Conference; there must be an absolute and unquestioning obedience to its behests in all matters, specially that of the appointments, or ruin impended to the societies despite the vitality of its doctrines and the piety of its members. The potential element was the machinery. That nothing of the kind happened in the New Connection body and the other offshoots in England, in the Methodist Protestant Church and other offshoots in America, served to dispel the illusion, and demonstrate that, when leaders are wedded to power, they are blind and deaf, not to the logic of theory only, but to the logic of facts as well. Much had been conceded, however, as has been found, and more probably would have been but for the imperatives of the Poll-Deed, thus evidencing the truth of one of the fundamentals, that it was responsible, directly or indirectly, for all the divisions in English Methodism. At least two important events took place between 1798 and 1806 in the Wesleyan Conference history, which must receive passing notice as outcroppings of the quiet struggle which still went on between the men of extreme views within it. On the 29th of March, 1799, Dr. Coke, having conferred with his confidential friends, and secured their approval, wrote to the Bishop of London one of those remarkable letters which remind us how thoroughly hierarchal he was in his convictions of church polity, and how little value he attached to his third ordination by Wesley. The full text is found in Drew's biography of Coke, pages 284-286. See Appendix B. The address is of the highest
- Page 53 and 54: deliverance from a "Methodist curat
- Page 55 and 56: sit apart, which had been violated
- Page 57 and 58: 1 Tyerman's "Life,'' Vol. III. p. 1
- Page 59 and 60: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 61 and 62: a deed of this kind, that I have go
- Page 63 and 64: arguments, except as it relates to
- Page 65 and 66: as, it was, no doubt, sincere. The
- Page 67 and 68: ordained Henry Moore and Thomas Ran
- Page 69 and 70: Church. Upon this the meeting was a
- Page 71 and 72: society in Plymouth. He was a man,
- Page 73 and 74: nothing else save the Arminian Maga
- Page 75 and 76: no longer." He was seriously sick d
- Page 77 and 78: eached 2828. The membership was 76,
- Page 79 and 80: * See Appendix to Dr. Kewley's "Inq
- Page 81 and 82: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 83 and 84: He said soon after, "I will get up,
- Page 85 and 86: short, and the design itself was sp
- Page 87 and 88: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 89 and 90: week of Wesley's death he wrote: "M
- Page 91 and 92: stewards, the admission and expulsi
- Page 93 and 94: wrote like a mountain torrent. Stro
- Page 95 and 96: present purpose reads: "But when on
- Page 97 and 98: y the calendar, must be used wherev
- Page 99 and 100: presidency the Conference would not
- Page 101 and 102: 1 Asbury's " Journal," Vol. II. p.1
- Page 103: HISTORY OF METHODIST REFORM Synopti
- Page 107 and 108: parent bodies will the mission of t
- Page 109 and 110: ENDNOTES 1 She was a Friend, but he
- Page 111 and 112: constantly devising new plans for i
- Page 113 and 114: urst out, and one Daniel Shubetham
- Page 115 and 116: insulted the representatives of the
- Page 117 and 118: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 119 and 120: courtesy due him, was thought too p
- Page 121 and 122: like Wesley, betrayed his ignorance
- Page 123 and 124: delicate woman, died and was buried
- Page 125 and 126: 1 "History of Methodism," Vol. III.
- Page 127 and 128: The respective theories are working
- Page 129 and 130: or usages which had been most assai
- Page 131 and 132: the ministry, its devotion and libe
- Page 133 and 134: METHODIST REFORM Edward J. Drinkhou
- Page 135 and 136: It is necessary to retrace steps to
- Page 137 and 138: to interfere with the internal affa
- Page 139 and 140: showed, in feasting at high dinners
- Page 141 and 142: ENDNOTE 1 The plan has since been a
- Page 143 and 144: into evil ways. Barbara Heck kept a
- Page 145 and 146: which was the vogue of a large numb
- Page 147 and 148: attended the ministry of both, conv
- Page 149 and 150: thing which I seek, a circulation o
- Page 151 and 152: ENDNOTES 1 Bangs' "History of the M
- Page 153 and 154: 13 Atkinson's "Methodism in America
Commentary is an imperishable monument. He was instrumental in the conversion of Joseph<br />
Butterworth, afterwards member of Parliament and the associate of Wilberforce, and enrolled with<br />
Thornton, Buxton, and Thompson as leading laymen. William Bramwell is a name known to the<br />
sacred biography of Methodism. "At one time," says Stevens, "he sympathized much with Kilham,<br />
in his projects of 'reform,' but his deep piety saved him." Comment is forborne. Extraordinary scenes<br />
attended his revivals. Samuel Hick, the "Village Blacksmith," is a memorable name in the ranks of<br />
the local preachers. His career, as depicted by Stevens and by his biographer, reads like a romance.<br />
He died in his seventy-first year in triumph, having spent more than fifty years in labor as a<br />
blacksmith and service as a <strong>Methodist</strong> preacher and exhorter. Under such auspices the United<br />
Societies increased in these seven years from 76,968 to 108,261. The itinerant ministry increased<br />
from 313 to 399, and during the same time some 20 new chapels were erected. [2]<br />
The eight Conferences from 1798 to 1806, being respectively the fifty-fifth to the sixty-third, were<br />
presided over in order by Benson, Bradburn, Wood, Pawson, Taylor, Bradford, Moore, and Coke.<br />
The excision of Kilham, the retirement of Thom and others from the Conference to join him, and the<br />
secession of five thousand members left the old Conference in a condition of acquiescence in the<br />
dominant party, the Legal Hundred and their supporters. There is no question that not a few of them<br />
were in earnest sympathy with a more liberal form of government. Indeed, so widespread was the<br />
espousal of such sentiments that, but for the Poll-Deed and its entrenchment of property power with<br />
the minority, the insistence of the advocates of liberal views and the force of their logic would have<br />
prevailed. It happened, as it always will in like controversial issues, that social ties, personal<br />
pecuniary support for dependent families, the risk involved in a system yet in theory, the recusance<br />
of the timid, and the uncertainties that loom up in such a venture quelled disaffection and, at least<br />
outwardly, tranquilized the main body of <strong>Methodist</strong>s. It must also be remembered that, besides the<br />
coign of vantage enjoyed by the adherents, their convictions were quite as intense, so that any<br />
innovation on the plan of Wesley meant destruction to the itinerancy and the decay of Methodism.<br />
He had so proclaimed years before his departure. The title of all property must vest in the<br />
Conference; there must be an absolute and unquestioning obedience to its behests in all matters,<br />
specially that of the appointments, or ruin impended to the societies despite the vitality of its<br />
doctrines and the piety of its members. The potential element was the machinery. That nothing of<br />
the kind happened in the New Connection body and the other offshoots in England, in the <strong>Methodist</strong><br />
Protestant Church and other offshoots in America, served to dispel the illusion, and demonstrate that,<br />
when leaders are wedded to power, they are blind and deaf, not to the logic of theory only, but to the<br />
logic of facts as well. Much had been conceded, however, as has been found, and more probably<br />
would have been but for the imperatives of the Poll-Deed, thus evidencing the truth of one of the<br />
fundamentals, that it was responsible, directly or indirectly, for all the divisions in English<br />
Methodism.<br />
At least two important events took place between 1798 and 1806 in the Wesleyan Conference<br />
history, which must receive passing notice as outcroppings of the quiet struggle which still went on<br />
between the men of extreme views within it. On the 29th of March, 1799, Dr. Coke, having<br />
conferred with his confidential friends, and secured their approval, wrote to the Bishop of London<br />
one of those remarkable letters which remind us how thoroughly hierarchal he was in his convictions<br />
of church polity, and how little value he attached to his third ordination by Wesley. The full text is<br />
found in Drew's biography of Coke, pages 284-286. See Appendix B. The address is of the highest