Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org
Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org
Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
then adds, "that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith," and "we through the Spirit<br />
wait for the hope of righteousness by faith"; "Walk in the Spirit," etc.<br />
3. In the passages quoted, and others that might be given, Paul chides them for their declension,<br />
reminding them that they had "fallen from grace" -- the way of salvation by grace and faith, rather<br />
than by works -- efforts of "the flesh." He then urges their return to the scriptural way of salvation<br />
and to a better life.<br />
4. He next assures them of his earnest prayer for their restoration: "My little children, of whom<br />
I travail in birth again, until Christ be formed in you, I desire to be present with you now, and to<br />
change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you." This prayer seems to have been (1) for their second<br />
spiritual birth, or such a restoration as would place them where they were at their conversion: "I<br />
travail in birth again." (2) For such a "forming" or enthronement of "Christ, the power of God," in<br />
their hearts that they would not fall again: "Until Christ be formed in you." (3) The cause of this<br />
anxiety and prayer was his "doubt" as to the soundness of their faith, and of their spiritual safety:<br />
"For I stand in doubt of you." (4) One result of such restoration would be that he could "change his<br />
voice" to them from one of censure to one of approval.<br />
One is struck with the fact that Paul more than once here refers to their "receiving the promise of<br />
the Spirit through faith," their being "made perfect" by faith, "living by faith," "waiting for the hope<br />
of righteousness by faith," "walking in the Spirit," etc. He evidently refers to the "baptism of the<br />
Spirit" which they needed, which comes by faith, and which, had they received it at or soon after<br />
their conversion, would have so established them that they may not have backslidden, and which<br />
would tend to save them from future relapses. And we need hardly add that what comes by faith and<br />
in answer to prayer ordinarily, if not universally, comes instantaneously and not by growth.<br />
We come back to the point that prayers, especially the most wonderful of them, were for such<br />
churches as had not backslidden, but were in a good and growing spiritual condition, for which he<br />
commended them. Also that the terms and tenses used indicate that answers to those prayers<br />
involved a momentary and finished work in the heart, like "the baptism with," or "the gift of, the<br />
Holy Ghost" -- the instantaneous coming into the soul of an Almighty "Power" that is henceforth to<br />
strengthen and dominate the life of the believer.<br />
This is what Paul tells the Galatians occurred in his own case: "I am crucified with Christ,<br />
nevertheless I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me, and the life that I now live in the flesh I live by<br />
the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me." Here is a complete crucifixion<br />
or domination [crucifixion is far the better and more <strong>Scriptural</strong> term. -- DVM] of his carnal nature<br />
by the new Christ-life that is in him, and that continues there so long as he lives by faith. And in<br />
another place he tells these Galatians how Christ came into his life -- by a sudden revelation of<br />
himself to his consciousness. (Gal. i. 15, 16.) Here the "separation," "calling," and "revelation" are<br />
all aorists, and indicate a momentary or single action. Dr. Steele says:<br />
"After his birth and calling or conversion, there was an instantaneous revelation of the Son of God<br />
within, to the spiritual eye, as there had been an objective revelation of the form of the Son of man<br />
to Paul's physical eye on his way to Damascus. Both Ellicott and Alford insist that the sequence of