Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

Dr. Steele continues:
"That the English scholar may understand our argument and our illustrations, we give the
following definitions: The present tense denotes what is now going on, and indicates a continuous,
repeated, or habitual action, as, 'I am writing.' The imperfect denotes the same continuity or
repetition in the past, as, 'I was writing.' 'The aorist indicative,' says Goodwin, 'expresses the simple
momentary occurrence of an action in past tense, as, "I wrote."' The perfect denotes an action as
already finished at the present time, as, 'I have written;' my writing is just now finished ... The chief
peculiarity lies in the aorist. We have in the English no tense like it. Except in the indicative it is
timeless, and in all the moods indicates what Kreuger styles 'singleness of act.'"
Dr. Steele fortifies His position by the following quotations from Buttman's New Testament
Grammar:
"The established distinction between the aorist as a purely narrative tense [expressing something
momentary], and the imperfect as a descriptive tense [expressing something contemporaneous or
continuous], holds in all its force in the New Testament. Says Winer: 'Nowhere in the New
Testament does the aorist express what is wont to be [a continuous process that has been or is still
going on.'"
In applying these principles of grammar to the Greek New Testament, Dr. Steele says:
"1. All exhortations to prayer and spiritual endeavor in the resistance of temptations are usually
expressed in the present tense, which strongly indicates persistence [a continuance of the course, or
a repetition of the act].
2. The next fact that impresses us in our investigation is the absence of the aorist and the presence
of the present tense -- whenever the conditions of final salvation are stated [these conditions being
continuous, and extending through probation.]
3. But when we come to consider the work of purification in the believer's soul by the power of
the Holy Spirit, both in the new birth and in entire sanctification, we find that the aorist is almost
uniformly used. This tense, according to the best New Testament grammarians, never indicates a
continuous, habitual or repeated act [as in the process of growth], but one which is momentary, and
done once for all [as in a baptism]."
After noting four classes of texts where there is real or apparent exception to this rule -- where
the aorist may "imply a state and not an isolated act" -- Dr. Steele says:
"The aorists of verbs denoting sanctification and perfection [perfect love], quoted in this essay
belong to no one of these exceptional classes."