Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

sighing; Tholuck is praying; but I am drinking like a brute.' But that very student became a noted preacher of the gospel. This writer then gives more fully the source of this remarkable power and success in the following words: "The source of this wonderful devotion and passion for the souls of his students was given by Professor Tholuck himself at the jubilee in Halle, held in his honor in the celebration of the fiftieth year of his immortal life-work. Multitudes came together from all parts of the land, and congratulations came from every class, including the emperor on the throne. On this occasion this world-honored teacher made this memorable declaration: 'What a number of my students have risen up who can say with myself, "I have but one passion, and that is Christ, and Christ alone." Such work can only be where the Spirit of fire is a beam of a divine influence from God. All my success has been owing to the baptism of fire (Feuergcist), which I received at the very commencement of my career, and to the principle of love that seeks and follows.'" What a marvelous work was wrought by this one consecrated professor, who was not a man of towering intellect or transcendent genius, but who, under the influence of this "baptism of fire," became the channel through which "the power of God" and the wisdom of changed the current of religious thought in a great university and a mighty empire, probably reaching hundreds of professors, thousands of students, and indirectly millions of the people. Oh that we had a man of like spirit and power in every professor's chair, State and Church, in this broad land of ours! Especially do we need such in our theological seminaries -- the "schools of the prophets." Dr. Mahan, many years ago, in writing of this matter and in referring to Professor Tholuck, used the following burning words: "Had I the ears of the professors in our theological seminaries, I would say to them: 'What God most desires in you as the immutable condition of the discharge of your high functions as the teachers of his truth, what is indispensable to the moral and spiritual culture of your pupils, and what the immortal well-being of the Church and the world imperiously requires of you, is the personal reception on your part of this baptism of fire." He says again: "A theological seminary, surely, should be, and may be, 'holy ground,' 'the house of God,' and a 'gate of heaven.' No man, however learned, is at all qualified to teach God's truth in it who is not 'full of faith and of the Holy Ghost.' A teacher of a class of candidates for the ministry, who is not thus filled with the Spirit, and does not so teach that the faith of his pupils shall stand, 'not in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God,' is doing more than any other individual can do to send men who are 'not spiritual but carnal' into the sacred office."

President Finney made the same complaint. He says: "It is painful to observe the constant tendency to substitute culture for this Holy Spirit power, or human learning and eloquence in place of this divine induement. I fear this tendency is increasing in the Church. The churches are calling for men of great learning and eloquence instead of men who are deeply baptized with the Holy Ghost. The seminaries of learning are much in fault in this thing. They do not lay half stress enough upon the possession of this induement as an essential qualification for usefulness in the world. The manifest possession of this induement of power should be considered an indispensable qualification for a professor in college or in a theological seminary. A theological professor who does not believe in this induement of power, and who does not possess it in a manifold degree, cannot fail to be a stumblingblock to his students. If he does not speak of it as altogether indispensable, and urge it upon them as the most important of all qualifications for the ministry, his teaching and his influence will be vitally defective." Another most earnest Congregational minister and author has recently had this to say to the theological professors of his Church: "Multitudes of them [former students], after years of experience in the ministry, look back with keen sorrow, not to say disgust, upon the impracticable training which they received at your hands, from the evil effects of which many of them never recover. As for myself, I compress all my complaints into this one charge: 'You did not show yourself to be baptized with the Holy Spirit, and show us how to receive the blessing, and, like the apostle Paul, with all the power of your beings, urge us to be possessors of it.' Oh that, like Tholuck, the 'Spirit of fire' were ever upon you all, and that, like him, you led your students to have but one passion, and that a passion for Christ and Christ alone!" He says elsewhere: "That element of success was not so much as mentioned in the classroom during my three years' course in one of the best Institutions of the land." And he points and enforces his exhortation and appeal with the fact that under the ministry of men trained in such seminaries there had for four successive years been over thirteen hundred Congregational churches that did not report a single accession on profession of faith, and that in 1896 the number was fourteen hundred and eighty-three. He also quotes Mr. Moody and others as saying "that there were over three thousand churches in the Congregational and Presbyterian bodies of this country that did not report a single member added by profession of faith" in 1895. Is it any wonder, then, that two ministers, graduates of leading universities and equally prominent theological seminaries, should have recently said: "If we were to start in the ministry again, knowing what we now know of the essentials to success, we would rather attend Moody's institute in Chicago one year, and learn our English Bible and get baptized with the Holy Spirit, than to have our seminary course repeated."

President Finney made the same complaint. He says:<br />

"It is painful to observe the constant tendency to substitute culture for this Holy Spirit power, or<br />

human learning and eloquence in place of this divine induement. I fear this tendency is increasing<br />

in the Church. The churches are calling for men of great learning and eloquence instead of men who<br />

are deeply baptized with the Holy Ghost. The seminaries of learning are much in fault in this thing.<br />

They do not lay half stress enough upon the possession of this induement as an essential qualification<br />

for usefulness in the world. The manifest possession of this induement of power should be<br />

considered an indispensable qualification for a professor in college or in a theological seminary. A<br />

theological professor who does not believe in this induement of power, and who does not possess<br />

it in a manifold degree, cannot fail to be a stumblingblock to his students. If he does not speak of it<br />

as altogether indispensable, and urge it upon them as the most important of all qualifications for the<br />

ministry, his teaching and his influence will be vitally defective."<br />

Another most earnest Congregational minister and author has recently had this to say to the<br />

theological professors of his Church:<br />

"Multitudes of them [former students], after years of experience in the ministry, look back with<br />

keen sorrow, not to say disgust, upon the impracticable training which they received at your hands,<br />

from the evil effects of which many of them never recover. As for myself, I compress all my<br />

complaints into this one charge: 'You did not show yourself to be baptized with the Holy Spirit, and<br />

show us how to receive the blessing, and, like the apostle Paul, with all the power of your beings,<br />

urge us to be possessors of it.' Oh that, like Tholuck, the 'Spirit of fire' were ever upon you all, and<br />

that, like him, you led your students to have but one passion, and that a passion for Christ and Christ<br />

alone!"<br />

He says elsewhere:<br />

"That element of success was not so much as mentioned in the classroom during my three years'<br />

course in one of the best Institutions of the land."<br />

And he points and enforces his exhortation and appeal with the fact that under the ministry of men<br />

trained in such seminaries there had for four successive years been over thirteen hundred<br />

Congregational churches that did not report a single accession on profession of faith, and that in<br />

1896 the number was fourteen hundred and eighty-three. He also quotes Mr. Moody and others as<br />

saying "that there were over three thousand churches in the Congregational and Presbyterian bodies<br />

of this country that did not report a single member added by profession of faith" in 1895.<br />

Is it any wonder, then, that two ministers, graduates of leading universities and equally prominent<br />

theological seminaries, should have recently said:<br />

"If we were to start in the ministry again, knowing what we now know of the essentials to success,<br />

we would rather attend Moody's institute in Chicago one year, and learn our English Bible and get<br />

baptized with the Holy Spirit, than to have our seminary course repeated."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!