Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION: An Attempted Solution of the Holiness Problem By The Rev. John R. Brooks, D.D. Chapter 24 SOME QUESTIONS ANSWERED 1. Can one who is filled with the Spirit live without sin? Is he not liable to, and does he not sin every day? We might possibly silence without satisfying the questioner by quoting the following from St. John: "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. Little children, let no man deceive you ... He that committeth sin is of the devil Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin: for his seed remaineth in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, etc." Here the apostle certainly seems to teach (1) that the regenerate man, who may or may not be fully saved from "inbred does not or need not commit actual sin -- "transgress" God's law of love. (2) That the mark of distinction between the Christian and the non-Christian -- the child of God and the child of the devil -- is that one sins and the other does not, this difference making "manifest" to which class one belongs. (3) That the probability of not daily sinning is so great in the case of one who "is born of God" in the highest and best sense -- is thoroughly renewed and "strengthened by his Spirit in the inner man," and has "his seed" remaining in him -- one whom Dr. Pope calls the "perfectly regenerate" -- that the apostle, in the language of hyperbole, says "he cannot sin." That St. John does not mean to teach that it is literally and absolutely impossible for a converted or fully saved man to sin is indicated plainly enough in I John ii. 1. Here he says that he wrote them certain things to prevent their sinning, but reminds them that if, notwithstanding, they should do so, they had an "Advocate" and "propitiation" in the person and work of Jesus Christ, through whom they might find forgiveness and cleansing. Dr. Steele gives the following translation of this difficult passage: "Whosoever has been born of God [perfect tense implying that the new life has continued] is not sinning, because he that has been born of God cannot be sinning because his seed remaineth in him" -- the love of God shed abroad in his heart by the Holy Ghost given unto him." The idea is that he cannot pursue a course of sin while the Holy Ghost abides in him and imparts love to his heart. Yet, he may be surprised into the act of sin -- "if any man sin" -- for which he may find instant forgiveness through the "propitiation" of our "Advocate." We leave those who say that we sin every day, "by thought, word, and deed," to harmonize their theory with the teaching of St. John in the above quotation. They attempt to do so by turning to such passages as I Kings viii. 46, Ecclesiastes vii. 20, and I John i. 7-10, which they suppose teach that all men sin daily. But, as critics have repeatedly shown, the first two passages, properly rendered, only teach that men may sin -- are liable to do so. The first passage is part of Solomon's prayer at the

dedication of the temple, and is, "If they sin against thee (for there is no man that sinneth not)" -may not sin is the proper rendering. As one has suggested, Solomon spoke just as the governor of one of our states would in dedicating an insane asylum, declaring, "If any citizen of this commonwealth should become insane (and there is no citizen who may not do so), etc. We would widely miss the mark if we interpreted him as saying, "There is no citizen who is not already insane." And Solomon puts it hypothetically in the first part of the verse, "If any man sin," just as John does when saying, "If any man sin, we have an Advocate," etc. The same is true of the passage in Ecclesiastes. It is amazing with what tenacity intelligent and learned men cling to the passage in John, cited above, to support their creed of necessary sin. If we had space, we would be glad to go into a thorough examination of this passage. But we must content ourself with only a few words. (1) St. John is believed to have intended this passage for the Gnostics or others who deny that they were [6] depraved or sinners. (2) He answers them by saying that this theory contradicts God's word, which says "all have sinned," and makes him a liar. (3) That if they would "confess" their sins and depravity, God would forgive and cleanse them. Just as a physician might say to his patient, who denies that he is sick: "By such denial you contradict my diagnosis of your case; but if you will practically confess your mistake by putting your case into my hands, I will cure the disease and restore you to health -- removing the poison out of your system." St. John refers to the condition of the patient, before the great Physician has done his cleansing and healing work. But when he "discharges" that patient, he has been "cleansed from all sin" and "all unrighteousness." And he would not now contradict God in saying, "I have no sin," or as Paul expresses it, I have been "freed from sin." It is only the man who makes such denial before he has been forgiven and cleansed that is guilty of this impious act of contradicting Jehovah. It is believed that people generally fail to note the difference between sins and infirmities so often pointed out by thoughtful divines. Mr. Wesley says: "Not only sin, properly so called, that is a voluntary transgression of a known law; but sin, improperly so called, that is an involuntary transgression of a divine law, known or unknown, needs the atoning blood. I believe there is no such perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary transgressions which I apprehend to be naturally consequent on the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality. Therefore sinless perfection is a phrase I never use, lest I should seem to contradict myself. I believe a person filled with the love of God is still liable to involuntary transgressions -- sins of infirmity." But Dr. Mudge says: "What are commonly called involuntary transgressions as a matter of fact generally involve minute volitions, escaping from us because of moral weakness. If so, they are not simply infirmities, but sins, although they may be termed small and comparatively unimportant sins." We might well ask, (1) How does Dr. Mudge get around St. John's repeated denial that the saved man commits sin, which he defines as the "transgression of the law," and assert that he does? And

SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION:<br />

An<br />

Attempted Solution of the Holiness Problem<br />

By The<br />

Rev. John R. Brooks, D.D.<br />

Chapter 24<br />

SOME QUESTIONS ANSWERED<br />

1. Can one who is filled with the Spirit live without sin? Is he not liable to, and does he not sin<br />

every day? We might possibly silence without satisfying the questioner by quoting the following<br />

from St. John:<br />

"Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.<br />

Little children, let no man deceive you ... He that committeth sin is of the devil Whosoever is born<br />

of God doth not commit sin: for his seed remaineth in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of<br />

God. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not<br />

righteousness is not of God, etc."<br />

Here the apostle certainly seems to teach (1) that the regenerate man, who may or may not be fully<br />

saved from "inbred does not or need not commit actual sin -- "transgress" God's law of love. (2) That<br />

the mark of distinction between the Christian and the non-Christian -- the child of God and the child<br />

of the devil -- is that one sins and the other does not, this difference making "manifest" to which<br />

class one belongs. (3) That the probability of not daily sinning is so great in the case of one who "is<br />

born of God" in the highest and best sense -- is thoroughly renewed and "strengthened by his Spirit<br />

in the inner man," and has "his seed" remaining in him -- one whom Dr. Pope calls the "perfectly<br />

regenerate" -- that the apostle, in the language of hyperbole, says "he cannot sin."<br />

That St. John does not mean to teach that it is literally and absolutely impossible for a converted<br />

or fully saved man to sin is indicated plainly enough in I John ii. 1. Here he says that he wrote them<br />

certain things to prevent their sinning, but reminds them that if, notwithstanding, they should do so,<br />

they had an "Advocate" and "propitiation" in the person and work of Jesus Christ, through whom<br />

they might find forgiveness and cleansing. Dr. Steele gives the following translation of this difficult<br />

passage: "Whosoever has been born of God [perfect tense implying that the new life has continued]<br />

is not sinning, because he that has been born of God cannot be sinning because his seed remaineth<br />

in him" -- the love of God shed abroad in his heart by the Holy Ghost given unto him." The idea is<br />

that he cannot pursue a course of sin while the Holy Ghost abides in him and imparts love to his<br />

heart. Yet, he may be surprised into the act of sin -- "if any man sin" -- for which he may find instant<br />

forgiveness through the "propitiation" of our "Advocate."<br />

We leave those who say that we sin every day, "by thought, word, and deed," to harmonize their<br />

theory with the teaching of St. John in the above quotation. They attempt to do so by turning to such<br />

passages as I Kings viii. 46, Ecclesiastes vii. 20, and I John i. 7-10, which they suppose teach that<br />

all men sin daily. But, as critics have repeatedly shown, the first two passages, properly rendered,<br />

only teach that men may sin -- are liable to do so. The first passage is part of Solomon's prayer at the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!