Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org
Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org
"2. But we may know that God manifests himself in Christian experience by the testimony of consciousness -- the same testimony that assures us of the existence of the external world ... So we reply that the soul illumined by the Holy Spirit is conscious not only of its own subjective religious exercises, but of a God, their external cause, impressing himself mysteriously upon the spirit. In other words, we may have, when our perceptions are quickened by the Holy Spirit, the same knowledge of God as we have of the external world. Christians in advanced experience universally testify that they know God. "It is fundamental in philosophy that consciousness cannot lie. To deny this would be to nullify mental science by throwing discredit upon the source of its facts. For it is a law of evidence that one proved falsehood destroys the credibility of a witness. 'Falsus in uno, falsus in ononobus' -- false in one instance, false in all. Consciousness testifies in Christian experience that a Power from without the soul enters in and subdues all things to himself, and that this Power is a person, since it does the work of a person, certifies to the penitent believer his pardon and awakens an intense love to the Worker -- an affection directed toward persons only. That this person of Christ, or rather the Holy Spirit revealing him, is directly apprehended by our spiritual perceptions in a manner wholly inexplicable to reason. But it ought not to be strange that he who created the infant with power to interpret its mother's smile should endow the human spirit with power to recognize his Creator's presence ... "The sudden pain which shoots through the nerves to the sensorium carries with it the feeling of certainty that some cause outside of the mind, some thorn or needle, is the cause of this sensation. In like manner, we argue that certainty which the Christian feels, that the changes occurring in his experience are not from some cause from within, but from without; and that this cause is not material, but spiritual, in its nature. We are endowed with the ability to discriminate between the objective and the subjective. If it were not so, we could not distinguish our perceptions from the images of our fancy. In like manner, we are enabled to discriminate between religious emotions, having an objective cause, and subjective phantasies. Hence, advanced Christians, especially, speak with the utmost assurance of their communion with God, and of the joy of the Holy Ghost. The Christian under the full illumination of the Spirit as certainly knows God as the Hamiltonian or non-Hamiltonian may know matter. Consciousness testifies to no greater certainty in the apprehension of the external world than she does in the knowledge of Christ. The direct intuition, or inference, if it be an inference, amounts to an absolute certainty in both cases." To the idealist objectors to this philosophy of experience Dr. Steele says: "To such persons we would say that the field of internal Christian experience affords the groundwork for a philosophy as positive as any based upon the facts of physics or civil history. The moral and religious intuitions furnish us with utterances as authoritative as those which arise in the field of pure intellect ... The facts for the truth of which Christian believers touch are as stubborn as any in the domain of science. It is certainly very unscientific to refuse to put them to the test of experiment, and then to discredit the testimony of the vast body of competent witnesses who hove done so, with the assertion that they are deceived or deceiving ... The Christian can give just as good an account of his experimental knowledge of Christ as the philosopher can give of his knowledge of the external world."
Let the doubting reader weigh well the above extracts. Dr. Steele quotes and endorses the following from Rauch's Psychology. In speaking of religion, the latter calls it "a peculiar activity of God in the human soul, differing from all its other operations, by which it is converted, renewed, and purified by a Power which manifests itself to the consciousness, needing no other light." The importance of this matter, we think, justifies the giving of these long extracts from such profound philosophers, who have experimented as well as speculated in this blessed science. And we think it is easy to show that this philosophy harmonizes with the teaching of Scripture, especially the five or six different facts of consciousness to which Bishop Foster calls attention. Did not Felix have a distinct consciousness of guilt, the publican of repentance, the father of the dumb demoniac of faith, the penitent woman at Simon's house of forgiveness, and the upper-room disciples of the baptism of purity, peace, and power? And was not this consciousness of these facts a knowledge of them? When the jailor was awakened, did he not know that he was guilty? When Paul was "justified by faith," did he not know that he had peace? When a man "loves the brethren," does he not "know" that he has "passed from death unto life"? And when one is conscious of absolute freedom from condemnation and fear, and from every feeling or temper contrary to love, having humble and confident boldness in view of the judgment having this experience continuously for a series of years -- does he not know that he has "perfect love"? When a man "tastes and sees that the Lord is good" and "gracious," does he not receive experimental knowledge of the fact? When he has "tasted the good word of God," "the heavenly gift," and "the powers of the world to come," has he not had an experience of these things? And does not this experience bring or involve a knowledge of them? May not a man as really know that he "hungers and thirsts after righteousness as that he hungers and thirsts for the things that satisfy his physical wants? And may he not just as really and satisfactorily feel and know that he is "filled" with "righteousness" as that he hungered and thirsted after it? And can he not know that he is "filled" with the Spirit and his fruit as really as that his physical hunger and thirst are satisfied? And if we may "know that we have passed from death unto life" -- been regenerated -- "because we love the brethren," why may we not know, with the same degree of certainty, that we have been saved from the impurity, weakness, and feeling of remaining spiritual depravity by the baptism of the Spirit, that "purifies our hearts by faith," "strengthens us with might in the inner man," "roots and grounds us in love," and "fills us with all the fullness of God"? These are just as really facts that emerge in consciousness as are the facts of guilt, pardon, the witness of the Spirit to adoption, and his fruit of "love, joy, and peace" which attends that witness. And the intelligence takes as full cognizance of the one class of facts as it does of the other, and as really knows of, and can as confidently testify to, their existence. While we will not stop here to argue the question, we are sure that the Spirit just as clearly testifies to the work of entire sanctification and its result of "perfect love," wrought after regeneration, as he does to the guilt and condemnation before that time, or to his pardon and adoption at that time. And we are sure that the fully saved believer is just as conscious of the Spirit's fruit of perfect or unmixed love, joy, and peace
- Page 53 and 54: "An influential and constantly incr
- Page 55 and 56: pollution, and weakness, as well as
- Page 57 and 58: Now, with these concessions and exp
- Page 59 and 60: a fuller measure of the Spirit when
- Page 61 and 62: Dr. Mudge would explain the case of
- Page 63 and 64: Truth and candor require admissions
- Page 65 and 66: his theory and ours seems to be tha
- Page 67 and 68: that time. In a letter to the write
- Page 69 and 70: Dr. Steele continues: "That the Eng
- Page 71 and 72: these Paul is believed to teach tha
- Page 73 and 74: prayers; remembering without ceasin
- Page 75 and 76: 3. The use of the aorist indicates
- Page 77 and 78: in their history, indicated by the
- Page 79 and 80: then adds, "that we might receive t
- Page 81 and 82: We have purposely omitted many pass
- Page 83 and 84: SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION: An Attem
- Page 85 and 86: In controverting the above, Dr. Gor
- Page 87 and 88: It would seem from the foregoing th
- Page 89 and 90: this "renewal," "sanctification," o
- Page 91 and 92: SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION: An Attem
- Page 93 and 94: standards on this subject." And we
- Page 95 and 96: Bishop Ninde comes the nearest to t
- Page 97 and 98: the man whom the Rev. Dr. D. C. Kel
- Page 99 and 100: SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION: An Attem
- Page 101 and 102: Peter's case illustrates the meanin
- Page 103: consciousness of repentance; (3) co
- Page 107 and 108: We are profoundly convinced that th
- Page 109 and 110: witnesses, to testify, not merely f
- Page 111 and 112: divinely inspired, is but the Bible
- Page 113 and 114: SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION: An Attem
- Page 115 and 116: give many passages of his writings
- Page 117 and 118: The same test was applied to regene
- Page 119 and 120: Again he says: "Not trusting to the
- Page 121 and 122: As late as 1768 he writes a friend,
- Page 123 and 124: I now obey it, and tell you all, to
- Page 125 and 126: We, for a time, turn from Methodist
- Page 127 and 128: "Since that resignation spoken of b
- Page 129 and 130: ethren of the High Life -- all thes
- Page 131 and 132: Kirk, in his lectures on Revivals,
- Page 133 and 134: "It was on the 23d of April, 1822,
- Page 135 and 136: SCRIPTURAL SANCTIFICATION: An Attem
- Page 137 and 138: to me to be the witness of the Holy
- Page 139 and 140: day in the Congregational Church. T
- Page 141 and 142: about the truth of the gospel, and
- Page 143 and 144: the shadow of one of those doubts w
- Page 145 and 146: purpose than I did ... For eighteen
- Page 147 and 148: "How has it been with me since?" Th
- Page 149 and 150: We note the usual expressions of th
- Page 151 and 152: "Never shall I forget the astonishm
- Page 153 and 154: "And now, if I am asked what is my
"2. But we may know that God manifests himself in Christian experience by the testimony of<br />
consciousness -- the same testimony that assures us of the existence of the external world ... So we<br />
reply that the soul illumined by the Holy Spirit is conscious not only of its own subjective religious<br />
exercises, but of a God, their external cause, impressing himself mysteriously upon the spirit. In<br />
other words, we may have, when our perceptions are quickened by the Holy Spirit, the same<br />
knowledge of God as we have of the external world. Christians in advanced experience universally<br />
testify that they know God.<br />
"It is fundamental in philosophy that consciousness cannot lie. To deny this would be to nullify<br />
mental science by throwing discredit upon the source of its facts. For it is a law of evidence that one<br />
proved falsehood destroys the credibility of a witness. 'Falsus in uno, falsus in ononobus' -- false in<br />
one instance, false in all. Consciousness testifies in Christian experience that a Power from without<br />
the soul enters in and subdues all things to himself, and that this Power is a person, since it does the<br />
work of a person, certifies to the penitent believer his pardon and awakens an intense love to the<br />
Worker -- an affection directed toward persons only. That this person of Christ, or rather the Holy<br />
Spirit revealing him, is directly apprehended by our spiritual perceptions in a manner wholly<br />
inexplicable to reason. But it ought not to be strange that he who created the infant with power to<br />
interpret its mother's smile should endow the human spirit with power to recognize his Creator's<br />
presence ...<br />
"The sudden pain which shoots through the nerves to the sensorium carries with it the feeling of<br />
certainty that some cause outside of the mind, some thorn or needle, is the cause of this sensation.<br />
In like manner, we argue that certainty which the Christian feels, that the changes occurring in his<br />
experience are not from some cause from within, but from without; and that this cause is not<br />
material, but spiritual, in its nature. We are endowed with the ability to discriminate between the<br />
objective and the subjective. If it were not so, we could not distinguish our perceptions from the<br />
images of our fancy. In like manner, we are enabled to discriminate between religious emotions,<br />
having an objective cause, and subjective phantasies. Hence, advanced Christians, especially, speak<br />
with the utmost assurance of their communion with God, and of the joy of the Holy Ghost. The<br />
Christian under the full illumination of the Spirit as certainly knows God as the Hamiltonian or<br />
non-Hamiltonian may know matter. Consciousness testifies to no greater certainty in the<br />
apprehension of the external world than she does in the knowledge of Christ. The direct intuition,<br />
or inference, if it be an inference, amounts to an absolute certainty in both cases."<br />
To the idealist objectors to this philosophy of experience Dr. Steele says:<br />
"To such persons we would say that the field of internal Christian experience affords the<br />
groundwork for a philosophy as positive as any based upon the facts of physics or civil history. The<br />
moral and religious intuitions furnish us with utterances as authoritative as those which arise in the<br />
field of pure intellect ... The facts for the truth of which Christian believers touch are as stubborn as<br />
any in the domain of science. It is certainly very unscientific to refuse to put them to the test of<br />
experiment, and then to discredit the testimony of the vast body of competent witnesses who hove<br />
done so, with the assertion that they are deceived or deceiving ... The Christian can give just as good<br />
an account of his experimental knowledge of Christ as the philosopher can give of his knowledge<br />
of the external world."